Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
USS Truman collision >

USS Truman collision

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

USS Truman collision

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2025 | 09:27 AM
  #1  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,194
Likes: 240
Default USS Truman collision

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5...rier-collides/

https://www.c6f.navy.mil/Press-Room/...lision-at-sea/

USS Harry S. Truman Involved in Collision at Sea

By U.S. Sixth Fleet Public Affairs

MEDITERRANEAN SEA – The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) was involved in a collision with the merchant vessel Besiktas-M at approximately 11:46 p.m. local time, Feb. 12, while operating in the vicinity of Port Said, Egypt, in the Mediterranean Sea.

The collision did not endanger the Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) as there are no reports of flooding or injuries. The propulsion plants are unaffected and in a safe and stable condition. The incident is under investigation. More information will be released as it becomes available.
Reply
Old 02-13-2025 | 05:19 PM
  #2  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,925
Likes: 698
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Rumor is the warships switched off AIS (commercial shipping equivalent of transponder). That implies they had elevated their tactical condition, which implies they might have been conducting flight ops, which would restrict their ability to manuever.
Reply
Old 02-13-2025 | 06:23 PM
  #3  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 93
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Rumor is the warships switched off AIS (commercial shipping equivalent of transponder). That implies they had elevated their tactical condition, which implies they might have been conducting flight ops, which would restrict their ability to manuever.
That is unlikely. They were surrounded by 30+ other ships all waiting to go through the canal. Ships turn off their AIS all the time. They are supposed to turn it on in "congested" areas, but I wouldn't be surprised if Naval vessels leave it off while they transit the canal. That's a critical moment and you don't really want to give too much notice that you are placing an expensive target in a confined area. That would be pretty wild to conduct flight operations when they were literally surrounded by 10 tankers within 5 nm.
Reply
Old 02-13-2025 | 06:31 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 255
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
That is unlikely. They were surrounded by 30+ other ships all waiting to go through the canal. Ships turn off their AIS all the time. They are supposed to turn it on in "congested" areas, but I wouldn't be surprised if Naval vessels leave it off while they transit the canal. That's a critical moment and you don't really want to give too much notice that you are placing an expensive target in a confined area. That would be pretty wild to conduct flight operations when they were literally surrounded by 10 tankers within 5 nm.
I know the canal is a lot faster but it does seem to be rather compromising from a tactical standpoint.
Reply
Old 02-13-2025 | 06:40 PM
  #5  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,925
Likes: 698
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
That is unlikely. They were surrounded by 30+ other ships all waiting to go through the canal. Ships turn off their AIS all the time. They are supposed to turn it on in "congested" areas, but I wouldn't be surprised if Naval vessels leave it off while they transit the canal. That's a critical moment and you don't really want to give too much notice that you are placing an expensive target in a confined area. That would be pretty wild to conduct flight operations when they were literally surrounded by 10 tankers within 5 nm.
Yes there's no assurance they'll run AIS at any particular time. I wouldn't expect flight ops there either unless there was some sort of exteme circumstance.
Reply
Old 02-13-2025 | 06:51 PM
  #6  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 93
Default

But would they really be running flight ops in such a congested area? Don't carriers go 25 knots during flight ops? That's pretty fast when you are surrounded by anchored boats.
Reply
Old 02-13-2025 | 07:12 PM
  #7  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,925
Likes: 698
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
But would they really be running flight ops in such a congested area? Don't carriers go 25 knots during flight ops? That's pretty fast when you are surrounded by anchored boats.
Yes they go fast. I was thinking maybe helo ops, don't need the wind over the deck but can't be jerking the helm around much either.
Reply
Old 02-14-2025 | 08:48 AM
  #8  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,194
Likes: 240
Default Update with pictures…

https://news.usni.org/2025/02/14/car...rt-for-repairs
Reply
Old 02-16-2025 | 06:02 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Rumor is the warships switched off AIS (commercial shipping equivalent of transponder). That implies they had elevated their tactical condition, which implies they might have been conducting flight ops, which would restrict their ability to manuever.
Its always turned off prior to transiting the Suez and I suspect left off anytime in the Red Sea. No sense making it super easy to get initial coordinates for a drone or missle attack.
Reply
Old 02-16-2025 | 06:04 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
But would they really be running flight ops in such a congested area? Don't carriers go 25 knots during flight ops? That's pretty fast when you are surrounded by anchored boats.
They go at the required speed to generate the required wind over the deck. Could be as slow as possible while maintaining steerage way up to flat out depending on the true winds and operations being conducted.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Safety
6
02-16-2011 07:19 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
0
05-26-2008 11:12 AM
Paddles
Hangar Talk
1
01-29-2008 01:05 PM
miker1369
Hangar Talk
11
10-21-2006 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices