Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Globalhawk Crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2012, 01:04 PM
  #1  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default Globalhawk Crash

Glad nobody got hurt but there goes another $175M of taxpayers cash.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Navy drone crashes in Maryland.

(C. Lawrence, CNN, 6/11/12) A U.S. Navy drone crashed Monday in a marsh near Salisbury, Maryland.The RQ-4A Global Hawk drone crashed during a routine training flight from Naval Air Station Patuxent River, according to Jamie Cosgrove, a spokeswoman for the Unmanned Aviation and Strike Weapons Program at the base.There were no injuries to civilians and no property damage, said the Navy, which said it is investigating the cause.Video from CNN affiliate WBOC showed smoke rising from brush fires in the unpopulated area.The drone crashed into a tributary of the Nanticoke River, a U.S. Coast Guard official said. The crash site has been blocked to recreational boat traffic while the agency investigates, the Coast Guard official said.As soon as Navy personnel lost contact with the unmanned vehicle, a piloted aircraft was dispatched to Maryland's Eastern Shore, where it came upon the wreckage and determined that it was unlikely anyone on the ground had been hurt, Navy officials told CNN. The crash occurred at about 12:11 p.m., near Bloodworth Island in Dorchester County, the Navy said.The aircraft is one of five aircraft acquired from the Air Force Global Hawk program. The BAMS-D program has been developing tactics and doctrine for the employment of high-altitude unmanned patrol aircraft since November 2006.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 06-11-2012, 04:46 PM
  #2  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

I have found that 175 million just doesn't buy much these days.

Best to look at the used market. Unless there isn't one.
jungle is offline  
Old 06-11-2012, 05:36 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

On the other hand, being able to dump it in a lake, river, or ocean with no loss of life is a pretty nice feature...while not foolproof, you can design in things like where it will go if systems malfunction.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 06-11-2012, 06:50 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
you can design in things like where it will go if systems malfunction.
Unless that system itself has a malfunction.
xjtguy is offline  
Old 06-11-2012, 08:01 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by xjtguy View Post
Unless that system itself has a malfunction.
True, but we could say the same about airliners in general. Now with complete fly by wire, what happens if that system has a malfunction? No servo tabs left to control, but you can make it pretty darn unlikely, and that's where I see the potential. As we go into the future, these layers will be designed in (like multiple computers/programs) and there will no doubt be some tough issues, but I'm sure they'll be dealt with.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 06-11-2012, 08:52 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Fat Jesus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
On the other hand, being able to dump it in a lake, river, or ocean with no loss of life is a pretty nice feature...while not foolproof, you can design in things like where it will go if systems malfunction.
Yeah, like making a nice soft landing in Iran.
Fat Jesus is offline  
Old 06-12-2012, 07:15 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
On the other hand, being able to dump it in a lake, river, or ocean with no loss of life is a pretty nice feature.

Just let Sully and Skiles fly em, problem solved.
xjtguy is offline  
Old 06-12-2012, 07:26 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

But how can this be true Skyhigh says they are the future and they are much safer than people flying these flying things.
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 06-12-2012, 08:07 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fluglehrer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: Pipers & RV-12
Posts: 236
Default

Originally Posted by Fat Jesus View Post
Yeah, like making a nice soft landing in Iran.
The interrogation is easier to. Just insert the memory stick instead of the sodium pentothal needle.
Fluglehrer is offline  
Old 06-13-2012, 02:40 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 165
Default

That UAS was larger than a citation! I'm relieved nobody was hurt.
sinkrate3278 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices