Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Air Asia A320 missing >

Air Asia A320 missing

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Air Asia A320 missing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2015, 05:37 PM
  #171  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
That happens when the A model you are flying is a cycled out ultra high time relic, that's already been retired out of military service. And the conditions you operate in are low level and moderate to severe turbulence on every pass.
Exactly.

But I don't believe the AirAsia A320 suffered the same fate. Hopefully we'll know what did cause this accident soon.
Timbo is offline  
Old 01-12-2015, 07:24 PM
  #172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo View Post
Exactly.

But I don't believe the AirAsia A320 suffered the same fate.
Neither do I..
Airhoss is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 12:15 PM
  #173  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,624
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo View Post
Yeah...in theory.

Now...why do you think so many fire bombers have failed wing spars?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYKIGT7EgSA
C-130 has known wing spar cracks and fatigue issues. Doubt that the A320. Plus is the straight wing of the C-130 designed to stall before failure? Doubtful.
PurpleToolBox is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 03:41 AM
  #174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Bligh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 786
Default

Originally Posted by LaissezPasser View Post
I'm most curious what you folks think of the Indonesian Transport Ministry's new requirement that all airline flight crews, beginning today, must be briefed face-to-face (!) on weather and operational issues before takeoff by an ops person from their airline?
Like Hoss has said, "bureaucratic window dressing". In the same category as having to certify "Fit for Duty", which begs the question, "Would I bother to show up if I wasn't?"

We have a new policy requiring a direct brief for all international flights over 6 hours "unless the captain determines that "overriding operational considerations exist preventing the call". What do you do with a 25 year Captain that has only called the dispatcher 6 or 8 times in his career when a saftey issue was noted. Now a six month dispatcher apprentice is going to hold his hand on weather charts?!!! We have had dispatchers that thought/said, if you couldn't get the MD-80 into Nantucket, you could just drive over from Boston in a rent-a-car, to be in position for the morning.

Last edited by Captain Bligh; 01-14-2015 at 04:11 AM. Reason: expanded realization of absurdity
Captain Bligh is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 04:07 AM
  #175  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Bligh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 786
Default

BTW, news reporting today the main fuselage has been located, 3km from the previously found tail section. Does anyone think one or the other could have floated prior to sinking long enough to drift that distance? I personally don't. leading me to unfairly jump to a conclusion of an inflight separation of the two. What language did they use in the cockpit, in other words will we have to wait for a translation also?
Captain Bligh is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 04:37 AM
  #176  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 5
Default

Fuselage found.

Found: Fuselage of AirAsia flight QZ8501 - Channel NewsAsia
Nonpilot is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 06:54 AM
  #177  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Bligh View Post
BTW, news reporting today the main fuselage has been located, 3km from the previously found tail section. Does anyone think one or the other could have floated prior to sinking long enough to drift that distance? I personally don't. leading me to unfairly jump to a conclusion of an inflight separation of the two. What language did they use in the cockpit, in other words will we have to wait for a translation also?
It looks like in the pictures from the ROV the numbers indicate around 300, which I assume to be 300 meters. With the aircraft breaking apart on impact of the water and currents, especially strong winds and currents given the weather, the tail section and fuselage could have easily drifted that far apart. Just my uneducated opinion though.
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 07:52 AM
  #178  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Default

Starting to sound a lot like the AF Airbus crash, for the same reasons.

Got to wonder what Airbus is going to do to "Fix" their frozen AOA/Pitot tube issues if indeed that's what also caused this one?
Timbo is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 01:32 PM
  #179  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Crashman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Lying Groaning in the Wreckage
Posts: 130
Default

No real CRM plus your standard 3-way fight between the Cpt, FO, and whatever the Airbus software programmer thought might be helpful. In the coffin corner. You're trying to penetrate the heavy stuff in a single-aisle weakling, NEED to climb from 32,000, get denied... *I* turn back or divert. Alive. They.... didn't. Betcha they were nose-up, stalled, at full power, and fighting each other... ALL the way down. "We're sinking! POWER! PULL BACK!" "What's happening?" (sound of stick pusher & stall warning continue to impact, throttles remain at full EPRs)
Crashman is offline  
Old 01-14-2015, 02:02 PM
  #180  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 104
Default

Based on the condition of the fuselage, the plane was ditched. It's largely intact with at least one wing still attached.
AvSec is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alphonso1
Charter
142
05-01-2017 08:29 PM
trent890
Charter
17
04-15-2012 06:39 AM
HectorD
Hangar Talk
2
06-01-2009 07:57 AM
Jurassic Jet
Cargo
26
11-15-2007 07:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices