Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Air Asia A320 missing >

Air Asia A320 missing

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Air Asia A320 missing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2014, 02:52 PM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
Default

Originally Posted by leardriver View Post
Dude are you like 12 or something? I only do that trick when I'm approaching weather at night in VMC. Just to supplement and validate what's on the radar. Geez!!! Oh and by the way. I have flown all the oceans of the world too. But I don't have to brag about it. You must be a gem to work with.

Prime example of why I rarely ever post.

As a current A320 operator. I hope this one gets solved.
God speed.
Sorry but when I read it the tone of your earlier post made it sound like were being sarcastic, in which case I simply misread/misinterpreted it.

My apologies; you are right in that blocking the lights out of your eyes does get you some more visual, but I wouldn't be doing that for hours on end.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 12-28-2014, 03:10 PM
  #42  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
Default

Originally Posted by Tanker-driver View Post
I'm also wondering what their gross weight/max alt was at the time. 38 seems awful high for a flight that was planned to be at 320 at that time. Is the Bus still having issues with pitot icing/airspeed unreliable/etc? Might be a factor as well considering the amount of moisture in the area at the time.
Tonight's news was saying they requested both FL380 and deviations, but were only cleared to deviate, not to climb. So the reduced stall margin up higher might not be a player, however....penetrating at 320 might not have been the best choice, obviously.
Timbo is offline  
Old 12-28-2014, 06:05 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,549
Default

CNN is reporting that the captain had over 20,000 hours, the 6,000 hours mentioned earlier is time flown at Air Asia...!

It just amazes me how professional pilots are so quick to crucify fellow aviators way before the A/C is even found....!
The Dominican is offline  
Old 12-28-2014, 07:21 PM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
Default

Originally Posted by The Dominican View Post
CNN is reporting that the captain had over 20,000 hours, the 6,000 hours mentioned earlier is time flown at Air Asia...!

It just amazes me how professional pilots are so quick to crucify fellow aviators way before the A/C is even found....!
And the gentlemen at air france had tens of thousands of hours as well, doesn't mean they knew what they were doing, just means they sat in a seat for a certain length of time.

Also, in that part of the world, it most certainly will be some collosal screwup in flying or judgment. I would be shocked to hear it wasn't the mechanical status of the aircraft.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 04:36 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,549
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorhi View Post
And the gentlemen at air france had tens of thousands of hours as well, doesn't mean they knew what they were doing, just means they sat in a seat for a certain length of time.

Also, in that part of the world, it most certainly will be some collosal screwup in flying or judgment. I would be shocked to hear it wasn't the mechanical status of the aircraft.
I've been involved in training for many years and have flown with pilots from all over the world, for the last 8 years have been flying in that part of the world.
Good pilots and weak pilots are everywhere and has very little to do with ethnicticity.

Get off that stupidity compadre, we crash airplanes and do stupid mistakes in the west just like anybody else
The Dominican is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 07:52 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,211
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorhi View Post
And the gentlemen at air france had tens of thousands of hours as well, doesn't mean they knew what they were doing, just means they sat in a seat for a certain length of time.

Also, in that part of the world, it most certainly will be some collosal screwup in flying or judgment. I would be shocked to hear it wasn't the mechanical status of the aircraft.
Actually I think you'd find the AirAsia Captain with 20000hrs (14k of which other than A320) to have a significantly different background from the AF FO at the controls holding back stick through the 447 event. The Af FO did not have even 10k hrs and much less experience in conventionally controlled aircraft.
Softpayman is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 10:37 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: It's still a Guppy, just a bit longer.
Posts: 727
Default

Originally Posted by Softpayman View Post
Actually I think you'd find the AirAsia Captain with 20000hrs (14k of which other than A320) to have a significantly different background from the AF FO at the controls holding back stick through the 447 event. The Af FO did not have even 10k hrs and much less experience in conventionally controlled aircraft.
The AF447 FO didn't even have 3,000 hours. TOTAL TIME. Way less than 10K.
Airway is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 12:15 PM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: Separating and expediting
Posts: 70
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo View Post
Tonight's news was saying they requested both FL380 and deviations, but were only cleared to deviate, not to climb. So the reduced stall margin up higher might not be a player, however....penetrating at 320 might not have been the best choice, obviously.
Somebody at Jakarta Control posted this image of the incident aircraft:



(I've been to Jakarta Control and that's exactly how I remember their displays... no question this is Jakarta).

What's alarming here is their groundspeed of 353. That UAE409 is a B777, and if they're cruising along at mach .84, that would mean 8501 is doing about 180 indicated... at FL363 and climbing... which can't be good.
ATCBob is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 01:00 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

It's not "alarming" if the ground speed is 353.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 01:12 PM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: Separating and expediting
Posts: 70
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
It's not "alarming" if the ground speed is 353.
And the aircraft 20 miles in front of him same direction and altitude is 150 kts faster? Yea, that's alarming to a controller. Upper winds aren't that different. They're probably doing mach 0.6 at FL360. I consider that alarming.
ATCBob is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alphonso1
Charter
142
05-01-2017 08:29 PM
trent890
Charter
17
04-15-2012 06:39 AM
HectorD
Hangar Talk
2
06-01-2009 07:57 AM
Jurassic Jet
Cargo
26
11-15-2007 07:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices