Quote:
Originally Posted by Noworkallplay
Sure. Now that would mean the company signing on the dotted line to a forever increasing liability under an uber expensive liability plan that they currently have no interest in increasing over the past 20+ years. Honestly whats the odds of them agreeing to that?
I’m simply pointing out that we can keep the current plan AND get an increase without having to negotiate for it every bargaining cycle. In other words, the assumption of your argument is not valid. We do not need to scrap the current plan in order to get something that has increases without having to negotiate it every time.
There is an alternative to your argument that accomplishes what you are arguing for. Are you willing to want that or are you just looking to say no to anything that is the current plan?