Martin and DeRosa endorse Nestor and Rogers

Subscribe
1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
Page 4 of 7
Go to
Quote: Oh please. The grammar police strikes. Is that all you've got? You must be a real pleasure to fly with.
Well, I had deleted to go easy on you but since you quoted it enjoy. Your inability to converse at the same level as a 10 year old only reinforces the level of intelligence behind your opinions and vote choice. Keep selling Nestor and Rogers, every post you make in their favor drives more people to vote against them.
Reply
Quote: I disagree. He might be middle of the road with the SM crowd, but this crowd doesn't represent the sentiment of the average line pilot. The average line pilot supports Sam and Scott.

Where you lose credibility is when you fail to address the double standards, but instead attack me.
I really don't think the "average" Pilot follows this stuff. Maybe the hard core Forumites, but I bet the average Pilot doesn't know much about any of the candidates.

Scoop
Reply
Quote: Did Briellman use the union email chain to push his endorsement to all the constituents in the council? If so, then yes, that was not an appropriate use of the email system.

DPA email channel? Who the crap cares... they are dead, but the mailbox is still open.

What Sam and Scott did was outside of what was ok in a desperate attempt to get some more votes to someone who is going to lose, shall we say, bigly.
80, are you are aware that Sam and Scott used the exact same paid campaign email service as Brielmann did when they endorsed Nestor and Rogers?
Reply
Quote: I really don't think the "average" Pilot follows this stuff. Maybe the hard core Forumites, but I bet the average Pilot doesn't know much about any of the candidates.

Scoop
I think you are correct, which is why Nestor and Rogers getting endorsed by two respected reps carries so much weight.
Reply
Quote: 80, are you are aware that Sam and Scott used the exact same paid campaign email service as Brielmann did when they endorsed Nestor and Rogers?
Then as per the very first line of my post that you quoted, no that was not an appropriate use of the email system.
Reply
Quote: Then as per the very first line of my post that you quoted, no that was not an appropriate use of the email system.
Why is it not appropriate? The candidates paid the $50 bucks, or what ever it is to email the endorsement.
Reply
So were you completely ok with Briellmann using the system to endorse Sham?
Reply
Quote: If you support DeRosa and Scott keeping the momentum going, and you support a unified C44 working together to advocate for C44 pilots, than Support Sam and Scott by voting for Nestor and Rogers.
+1 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Reply
Quote: If you support DeRosa and Scott keeping the momentum going, and you support a unified C44 working together to advocate for C44 pilots, than Support Sam and Scott by voting for Nestor and Rogers.
Sam and Scott are a blank check for management. Together with Mason they will be selling concessions very soon.

What a disgrace.

We can save dues money if Nestor wins. He can fly the line and we can put an Ed bobblehead in his seat.
Reply
Quote: So were you completely ok with Briellmann using the system to endorse Sham?
You are the one saying it's not appropriate, not me. Please tell me where your outrage was when Brielmann used the same resource to endorse Kramer, Aly, and Adler. Better yet, when Schnitzler used it to publish Brielmann's and Kingsley's endorsement of his campaign, when neither was even a member of the CVG council.
Reply
1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
Page 4 of 7
Go to