Quote:
Originally Posted by iPilot
To add this merger language isn't anything outlandish. When it was written it was top of the line for giving the union the ability to prevent whipsaw by forcing a merger if there's ever a situation like ABX/ATI where Atlas owns two airlines to pit against each other.
What wasn't expected is that the company could turn it around and use it to force the union to merge. The arbiter in the Southern case ruled they could and imposed a 45 day time limit on the SLI which wasn't anywhere in the contract language. Additionally it imposes Southern's merger language on Atlas which is still technically a separate pilot group and union. It would be like FedEx buying Southern and then forcing the FedEx pilots into the southern merger process (and ending up with something between FDX and Southern's contract, somehow). The FedEx pilots wouldn't even get a vote in the matter!
Its a shaky ruling that if allowed to stand is quite dangerous for the industry. It sets precedent where Atlas can merge with any airline and impose a wildly one-sided merger process on the pilots. Not to veer too much into politics but this is what happens when you have severely anti-labor politicians placing judges and arbiters in positions like the NMB where they can wipe out our bargaining ability with a simple court ruling.
That’s why I say to get both pilot groups together; negotiate an SLI, and make it effective upon ratification of a pilot ratified CBA. You’ve complied with the intent of the ruling.... yet it remains leverage to get section six concluded swiftly.
Not to wade into politics too much, but the NMB members are majority appointments by Democrats. I bet the current admin would likely eliminate agencies like the NMB as wasteful and interfering with free market negotiations by placing the thumb on the scale.... or in this case the full palm on the scale.