Finally someone with a sense of humor!

I feel like I'm in the ready room watching a DH argue with a Captain, who's making popcorn!

I earned that patch!

Promotion held up 6-8 months until I could PROVE I wasn’t there!

So first if you’re not with SouthWest you don’t have any right to speak and secondly if you haven’t been “Navy” you don’t know what yer taking about?
Weak defense bro.

And from sexual harassment to sexual assault is a very small step.
Yes the lawsuit has merit especially if they can prove that they were singled out for “you’re no longer one of us” treatment in order to protect the “good ol boys” network.

Are you even living on the same planet as most of us? Please explain how this was sexual harassment. The video was made months before she even saw it on his company Ipad. It showed only his face and upper torso and most of all it had nothing to do with sex or harassment.

She has lied that it was streaming, she is still lying today that it was streamed, (if you have been in the forward lav of a 737 you would know there is no place to hide even the tiniest camera that wouldn't be glaringly apparent), she lied that the pilots could not leave the airplane and she spread false SSI information about the FFDO program.

This happened over 2 years ago and was thoroughly reviewed by management. They had full access to the pilots Ipad and all were made aware that there was no streaming. That it was obviously a pre recorded video that was made months before and that the pilot had pulled this same joke on a number of occasions.

Please stop your self righteous indignation as you tarnish those who have actually been sexually harassed and then through your warped mind say a joke video that had nothing to do with the flight attendant leads to sexual assault.

Plus please tell us more about the good old boy network as most the people in HR at Southwest are either women and/or gay. That would have no problem throwing a cis white male under the bus at any signs of impropriety.

Stop being so tone deaf.
The video shows the defendant performing a bodily function.
The strong suggestion is that surveillance video of other people performing such functions exists.
This would include minors and cabin crew.
We are talking about felonies here.
You really don’t need to be a lawyer for this.


So I commit a robbery with an unloaded gun. My defense: gun wasn’t loaded so it wasn’t a real armed robbery.

So I commit a robbery with a toy gun.
My defense: gun wasn’t real so it wasn’t a real robbery.

For all intents and purposes it was suggested the bathroom was under surveillance.
Whether it really was or not is (almost) irrelevant.
Same as the bank teller not being required to be able to tell an unloaded gun from a loaded gun there is no requirement for cabin crew to be up to date with the capabilities of the latest surveillance equipment.

This is not a $20 bill coming out of the ACARS printer.

Now Bluesideup, some may think, based on your observation, that you may seem to be a wee bit on the misogynistic homophobic side. But your co-workers will rally to say that it just can’t be. After all, working for a carrier with progressive views and strong values regarding teamwork... right?.... You are employed by WN... aren’t you?

Now, captjns, some may think, based on your observation, that you may seem to be an idiot.

I think if you stir the pot enough the mysoginists come floating up.

And if you stir the pot enough the trolls keep trolling. This whole thing has jumped the shark.
This lawsuit is idiotic and has no merit.

I am out.