Federal Mask Cops Start Targeting Travelers

Subscribe
1  2  3  4  5  6  12 
Page 2 of 25
Go to
I read over the CDC proclamation citing chapter and verse of US Code. All 11 pages.

Can’t see where any of the cited laws allows them to fine people for not wearing masks or even enforce mask wearing. They can actually QUARANTINE people they believe may be infected, but not charge them with crimes.




Reply
Quote: Just what we need. More aisle donkeys and smurfs on an even bigger power trip.

​​​​​​Don't you mean "wagon dragon?"
Reply
Quote: ​​​​​​Don't you mean "wagon dragon?"
What happened to "Tail Gunner?"
Reply
Quote: What happened to "Tail Gunner?"
I've never heard that one, but I like it! Makes one sound like a badass!
Reply
Quote: I read over the CDC proclamation citing chapter and verse of US Code. All 11 pages.

Can’t see where any of the cited laws allows them to fine people for not wearing masks or even enforce mask wearing. They can actually QUARANTINE people they believe may be infected, but not charge them with crimes.
Early in covid I did some reading and came to the same conclusion. There are long-standing laws which allow governments (at various levels) to require that you quarantine in the interest of public health... the penalties for violation can include jail time. Go back a century or two and epidemics used to be very real and very dangerous.

But for masks they'd have to try and piggy-back on some existing law since nobody seems to have gotten around to passing masker laws yet. Again, your prohibition example... most pols probably know better that to open a large can of unenforceable worms. We're getting to the point where they know that most rank-and-file LEOs will simply not enforce outrageous royal proclamations. Cops have enough problems right now without hysterical 911 calls for masks below noses, etc.
Reply
Forbes nailed this one:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybe...h=264d8016d40e

The order is a reflection of the change in Administration, both the President and his new Director of the CDC.

The new order is here.
Reply
......about a year late.
Reply
I'm still trying to figure out how the Federal government has jurisdiction and the legal authority to regulate behavior in a privately owned mode of transport (eg: taxi, Uber) that does not cross state lines.

You can make the case for airlines (crosses state lines and the entire system is federally regulated), trains (all government subsidized or operated), and municipal buses (same as trains). But if I own a car service in Tinytown, USA, why is the federal government involved?


I see it as just more government creep, slowly acclimatizing the sheep to the notion that the Federal government is responsible for every facet of their lives and can rule them by dictate.
Reply
"I'm still trying to figure out how the Federal government has jurisdiction and the legal authority to regulate behavior in a privately owned mode of transport"

There is nothing to figure out. The government does whatever they want. Is this so hard to understand?
Reply
Quote: "I'm still trying to figure out how the Federal government has jurisdiction and the legal authority to regulate behavior in a privately owned mode of transport"

There is nothing to figure out. The government does whatever they want. Is this so hard to understand?
Oh, I understand it. I'm just trying to understand why half of this country WANTS it and the other half of the country is SITTING STILL for it.
Reply
1  2  3  4  5  6  12 
Page 2 of 25
Go to