Quote:
The word "scab" is interesting. When they first announced that they would transition our jobs to GS with a from $7K - $13K pay cut, I suggested that everyone in our "Association" (reconginized bargining group not affiliated with any other group or union") get together and all agree not to apply for the jobs. Most Everyone agreed that would be a good idea, but there would plenty of other guys that would do our jobs for less money. I think SCAB would be an appropriate description. So, most guys are reapplying for thier same job at less pay. the question is: Are they SCABs for thier own jobs? That's kind of a running joke here. Plus, most of them are in a bind and this is about all they can do at this time. I suspect those Contential guys were in the same boat. I am not judging either way, but I am not applying for the GS job either. What about the RJ guys? Aren't they flying mainline routes for less money? What does that make them?Originally Posted by blastoff
In the phrase "Continental Scab," its the scab part he is keying in on. People judge scabs, that's the risk they took when they scabbed.