04-27-2024Quote:
Of course the numbers do depend on the economy at the time.
Thread is from 2008. Necroposting...don't do it.Originally Posted by Opteryx
If they take away 20 year retirement for new recruits, the number of new recruits would not go down much I wold venture to guess. But the number of expensively trained, hard to replace folks at the 8 to 12 year point that would elect to continue on to 20 or more would drop to the single digits, or nearly that I would think. There goes all that experience. And the tax payers would keep paying for new training, and we'd have a force of newbies all the time.Of course the numbers do depend on the economy at the time.
