Problem with Flight 1549 - Your thoughts... - Page 5

#41

SmoothOnTop , 01-16-2009 06:50 AM

Gets Weekends Off

Birds typically fold wings and dive when encountering airplanes,
your theory should do the same...

#42

BoilerUP , 01-16-2009 06:51 AM

The NeverEnding Story

Since we all have short memories when it comes to what ******in geese can do to an airplane...AirTran guppy in PHL, I believe 2007:

#43

STILL GROUNDED , 01-16-2009 06:52 AM

Gets Weekends Off

Quote:

Originally Posted by TruthSleuth

Excellent video, BoilerUP... very convincing.

That's why I'm here. Looking for answers.

Where in Lancaster is your law office located?

#44

WarEagle28 , 01-16-2009 06:53 AM

Gets Weekends Off

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler

Let me help you with that Einstein. Others have posted science based facts as to why your concerns are unfounded. You haven't let that get in the way of your "theory." Since most real pilots have an extremely low tolerance level for those who don't listen to facts, that is a recipe for hostility.

One more time:

1. The wings of the A-320 could easily handle the weight of 100 people on each wing even IF that wing wasn't being supported by the surface tension of the Hudson River's water. Not to mention the buoyancy of a wing that is half filled with air.

2. The warnings of "NO STEP" that you see on some wings is only for the actual area of the "NO STEP" placard. Those are generally localized areas of inter-wing subsystems that could be damaged by a person standing directly over them as the upper wing's skin will deflect a little. It is NOT a warning prohibiting you from stepping on the entire wing.

3. Jet engines suck in thousands of cubic feet of air per second - think enormous vacuum cleaners. Even at idle thrust they can suck a rock right off a taxiway. That's why airport surfaces are patrolled and kept as clean as possible. The fact that most of the birds were sucked into the engines is no surprise. It's quite normal. Most birds that do impact the nose or leading edges don't leave dents, but they do leave a lot of blood and guts. I assume that any blood and guts would have been blasted away by the impact and scrubbing forces of the aircraft impacting the river at 130+ miles per hour.

Please return to the Kennedy assassination blogs. Thank you.

Carl

Carl,
With regards to TruthSeuth: "the wheel is turning but the hamster is dead"...I don't think he'll ever get it.

#45

Kilgore Trout , 01-16-2009 06:53 AM

Gets Weekends Off

ThomsonFly 757 one engine bird ingestion, and resolution video.
YouTube - ThomsonFly 757 bird strike & flames captured on video

#46

Raging white , 01-16-2009 06:54 AM

Gets Weekends Off

Quote:

Originally Posted by TruthSleuth

Politics?

You must be kidding me.

What is going on here?

I haven't voted in over 22 years... I'm anti-political. I HATE politics.

I'm trying to show you that the media MIGHT BE distracting us. I showed absolute proof of it, and you call it POLITICS?

Give me a break.

Let me guess, I'm going to get banned soon, too?

Not if I have anything to do with it!!

You seem to be the only one speaking truth to power. The Man has been keeping us down long enough, and if your truths are scary, then it's time for brave men like us to step up and bring power to the people!

Either that, or you ARE a tool.

#47

UnlimitedAkro , 01-16-2009 06:55 AM

Gets ALL Days Off

Quote:

Originally Posted by TruthSleuth

Yes, I do know how airplanes fly.

I also know that most commercial airliner wings have weight warnings about stepping on the wings... hundreds of pounds maximum if I remember correctly.

So how do you think those two wings will hold a 100,000lbs aircraft up in the air?

#48

MD11Fr8Dog , 01-16-2009 06:57 AM

...Whatever It Is!

Quote:

Originally Posted by TruthSleuth

I'm not a conspiracy theorist...

- As of this moment, I've yet to see a single video of the ditching... not one, And I've searched everywhere (including YouTube) -- how can this be? Everyone seems to have a cell phone these days... especially in New York. What about CCTV cameras from the Port Authority... someone has to have a video of this, yet we see nothing. Why?

- One pilot (who if I remember posted here in this thread) lived near the crash scene admits he didn't see the plane ditch... didn't hear the plane ditch, but then saw the plane floating. Odd don't you think?

- The only witnesses of the actual ditching were members of the media (who as you know cover all sorts of things up)... example:
"I just thought, 'Why is it so low?' And, splash, it hit the water," said witness Barbara Sambriski, a researcher at The Associated Press.

You're right, and what's even more amazing was that no one was able to get video of Bush and Cheney towing that plane down the Hudson to get it in place! And I bet all of those "survivors" were the same "people" that were on the Navy ship that shot down TWA 800, and were also on the United 93 flight that landed Cleveland!

I think you're on to something!

Uh, I mean on something!

#49

Jake Wheeler , 01-16-2009 06:59 AM

Gets Weekends Off

Quote:

Originally Posted by TruthSleuth

Let me guess, I'm going to get banned soon, too?

It's a conspiracy, TS. Yes, the Men in Black are out to get you. I'd take precautions now if I were you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NuGuy

One only needs to watch late night infomercials to gauge the savvy of the majority.

100 is the average IQ. Ergo, half the population has an IQ below 100. Late night infomercials are made for this half. The other half are in bed or watching Jimmy Kimmel.

#50

deltabound , 01-16-2009 07:01 AM

Banned

Another college kid looking to make another stupid "troofer" video like "Loose Change.", and he'd like us to provide the data.

Don't feed the troll. Remember, by definition, half the people in this country are below average intelligence.