Thanks. That could be something we can work on.

The MEC needs to start reading the bathroom walls in here. I brought up the "Call in Honest" policy in another thread back in December of last year. Several other issues have appeared in here from other pilots that should have been addressed much earlier.

As an aside, I also brought up the crew rest facility on the A330 and was assured that the DAL-S guys were hardcore about the issue, that I was premature in mentioning it, and that it would be handled before 4 pilot crews appeared on the 330. Guess thats why we are flying over 12 hour legs from LAX-NRT with 3 pilots and no rest facility for 4 pilots. (I blame DAL-N guys for this...)

MEC if you are listening, get the "Call in Honest" policy (DAL-N) into our contract!

Does that mean Jeff didn't talk much?

Carl

Nope, sure didn't. Would answer a question, if asked, but it was a long leg from DEN to MSP. Pete Moore, on the other hand, would talk non-stop.

Ferd

I don't know what's worse...Jeff not saying anything, or Pete saying anything!

Carl

If the LAX NRT flight exceeds 12 hours it is a FAR violation as well as a contractual violation. The FAA requires 4 pilots and a horizontal rest facility on any flight that exceed 12 hours block time more then 30 percent of the time. The FAA has never given Delta a inch on this and has threatened to shut down several flights that were exceeding the 30 percent. SVO-ATL is a great example. Delta had to get the flight priority into ATL for the arrival flow as well as taxi and parking to make the numbers or we were going to be shut down. If you have knowledge that the flight is not in compliance with FAR's please call the FAA safety hotline and DALPA.

added via edit: I took a look at the block times. The flight is blocked at 11:55. Another airline leaves LAX for NRT at almost the same time and they block their flight for 11:30. Even if the 330 flew as much as .04 mach slower the time seems reasonable. The 30 percent rule is applied over a 90 day window. If at the end of 90 days the flight is out of compliance by even 1 percentage point I can assure you DALPA will be all over it. I don't have access to NWA data. You should however have that access. You can pull all the rotations since the 330 picked up the route and find out what the actual block times are coming in at. If they are over 12 hours more then 30 percent of the time give your reps a heads up. At the end of 90 days the 330 will be removed from the route if its out of compliance.

I can't check history only the last flight. On 24 May the flight blocked 11:32 from LAX-NRT.

The numbers I was given from ALPA Contract Admin and LEC reps. 6 month data window and segment must exceed 12 hours over 75% of the data window before the FAA will force management to double crew.

Flight segment time for a 747-400 LAX-NRT block to block is 11:40 in the NW timetable and on our printed patterns (last week of March). 747-400 cruises at .86 mach. A330 cruises at 0.82 mach using a wing designed for 0.80 mach. When NW bought the A330 we bought a "performance guarantee" for fuel comsumption at cost index 100 (~0.82mach), Pushing the wing to 0.83 results in significant fuel burn increase. Company claimed that the A330 could "get off the ground faster than a 747-400" to make block to block of 11:55 on the same segment that a 747-400 did in 11:40, but freely admitted that using common taxi times, the A330 block to block time would be over 12 hours. You can do the math if you are reasonably proficient at algebra. 11:40 at 0.86M = >12:00 at 0.82M

This was all covered in another thread.

For winter months there is no debate, A330 block time WILL exceed 12 hours. This will be a moot point for the rest of the summer as the 747-400 is being reassigned to LAX-NRT in June, bu the issue is still out there until the initial database is established for the A330.

Edit: For Jun the segment time (as expected) is 11:10 for a 747-400. In PARS the actual block out/in times disappear after one day and are replaced with the scheduled block times.

I've been told by senior guys here at DAL S that commuting "is a choice".(They DON'T.) So there won't be a lot of support from older guys here, in my opinion...maybe I'm wrong.

Well...fortunately, the older guys aint the majority. My bet is commuters will be the majority. The only question will be if the MEC cares at all what the pilots think.

Carl