Quote:
Originally Posted by A320fumes
In accordance with precedent, why would we expect the rules to change for UAL furloughees at this time. In addition to the furlough issue, the scope that UAL has brought into the CAL operation also threatens more UAL furloughs if UAL's 70 seaters are allowed to creep into the CAL network as currently planned. If the UAL MEC were interested in the return of the UAL furloughees more than they cared about the top 500 positions, they would get past this 747 carve out and help CAL fight the 70 seat issue. Instead, they are trying to use the 70 seaters migration onto CAL property as leverage to achieve their carve out...sad.
CAL has 147 furloughees. UAL has 1437. In accordance with precedent, all furloughees should be merged at the bottom of the list.
I fully expect UALMEC to allow the 147 CAL furloughees to be merged into the active pilot list, in violation of ALPA M&A procedures. Why? Because that's UALMEC's standard way of doing business.
And based on my previous exchanges with CAL pilots on flightinfo, many CAL pilots are more than happy with the idea of having the bottom 1437 of the combined list being comprised solely of UAL furloughees.
You're preaching to the choir on 70 seaters. UALMEC will not do anything to limit 70 seaters, as it does not benefit the top ~500. If there was a 25 cent/hr increase in pay for the senior widebody pilots, they would agree to dump all narrowbodies and have that flying outsourced. Based on previous behavior which has been extremely consistent, UAL furloughees are worth less than two bits to the senior UAL pilots.
The 747 carve out is total BS. UAL pays the same for 747 and 777 pilots, but it's of no surprise to me that they'd be pushing for a carve out. Who benefits from the carve out? The top ~500 UAL pilots. And they'll be more than happy to sell out the entire rest of the UAL seniority list for that carve out.