Search
Notices

Windfall?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2010, 11:27 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Retired
Posts: 230
Default Windfall?

So, if the top UAL guys get there way and have a carve out for the 747, is there any way this can not be construed as a windfall for them? I thought ALPA merger policy precluded any 'windfalls' for any segment of the list?
tailwheel48 is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 11:59 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 165
Default

Originally Posted by tailwheel48 View Post
So, if the top UAL guys get there way and have a carve out for the 747, is there any way this can not be construed as a windfall for them? I thought ALPA merger policy precluded any 'windfalls' for any segment of the list?
Go read some past merger arbitrations, often one group had some put at top(or bottom) for various reasons. Latest was USAirways capts put on top due to no widebodies at America West being an example.
30west is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 03:58 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Fero's
Posts: 472
Default

The JCBA has nothing to do with SLI. Nothing decided at this point should have anything to do with the SLI.

There is no "Carve out" nor is there a "Windfall" until there is integration.

The only thing we should be fighting for now is an industry leading contract. After that is done, we can fight for seniority.
chuckyt1 is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 05:00 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Default

Originally Posted by tailwheel48 View Post
So, if the top UAL guys get there way and have a carve out for the 747, is there any way this can not be construed as a windfall for them? I thought ALPA merger policy precluded any 'windfalls' for any segment of the list?
Not to worry, UALALPO will be happy to throw all UAL furloughees under the bus to make things even out. Top of UAL list to the top and bottom of UAL list stapled. Some things never change.
Andy is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 03:12 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrail67's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 737
Posts: 590
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
Not to worry, UALALPO will be happy to throw all UAL furloughees under the bus to make things even out. Top of UAL list to the top and bottom of UAL list stapled. Some things never change.
Of course...why would you "predict" anything else....

Nothing has been announced at all.
contrail67 is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 05:43 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 777 Cap
Posts: 199
Default hmmmm

Originally Posted by tailwheel48 View Post
So, if the top UAL guys get there way and have a carve out for the 747, is there any way this can not be construed as a windfall for them? I thought ALPA merger policy precluded any 'windfalls' for any segment of the list?
No windfall at all.

This would be nothing more than trying to return to the productivity formula from previous contracts prior to bankruptcy.

This would be no more of a windfall than trying to get back:

Defined contribution plan
Defined contribution (company) equal to or greater than old actual contribution
No contribution to medical
No contribution to dental
Vacation touching
Pay for training
Downtown hotels less than 20 hr L/O
etc, etc, etc


Trying to negotiate BACK what we had is not a windfall for anyone, but a contractual improvement for everyone!
flap is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 09:29 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UalHvy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 430
Default

Originally Posted by chuckyt1 View Post
The JCBA has nothing to do with SLI. Nothing decided at this point should have anything to do with the SLI.

There is no "Carve out" nor is there a "Windfall" until there is integration.

The only thing we should be fighting for now is an industry leading contract. After that is done, we can fight for seniority.
Exactly! Would you please explain that to our MECs?!
UalHvy is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 10:40 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dumpcheck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 126
Default

If the top 300 UAL pilots are currently 747 CAPTs, they are gonna stay 747 CAPTs...if they are at the "top" of the list, how is that a windfall?
dumpcheck is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 11:25 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,882
Default

Originally Posted by dumpcheck View Post
If the top 300 UAL pilots are currently 747 CAPTs, they are gonna stay 747 CAPTs...if they are at the "top" of the list, how is that a windfall?
And how would them staying a 747 CA be any different even if they weren't at the exact top of the list? Most likely there will be fences or positions available on where there are vacancies.

It would also be wrong to assume the biggest airplane captains are the most senior or the most senior people are always captains.

We have tons of senior FOs who could easily hold captain on everything from the 737 to the 777 if they desired. They don't bid it because our contract, work rules and PBS creates a vacuum. Their QOL would suffer by upgrading. Get all this fixed and you will see some movement off the senior FO ranks when vacancies occur in the system.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 11:36 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Retired
Posts: 230
Default

Originally Posted by dumpcheck View Post
If the top 300 UAL pilots are currently 747 CAPTs, they are gonna stay 747 CAPTs...if they are at the "top" of the list, how is that a windfall?
So you're saying that the top 300 numbers should be reserved for UAL pilots?
tailwheel48 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brakechatter
Major
601
10-12-2010 11:54 AM
Sandhawk
Major
159
06-30-2009 11:44 AM
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
495
06-28-2008 06:11 PM
sailingfun
Mergers and Acquisitions
53
05-21-2008 07:48 PM
RockBottom
Major
11
10-23-2005 10:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices