Originally Posted by
tailwheel48
So, if the top UAL guys get there way and have a carve out for the 747, is there any way this can not be construed as a windfall for them? I thought ALPA merger policy precluded any 'windfalls' for any segment of the list?
No windfall at all.
This would be nothing more than trying to return to the productivity formula from previous contracts prior to bankruptcy.
This would be no more of a windfall than trying to get back:
Defined contribution plan
Defined contribution (company) equal to or greater than old actual contribution
No contribution to medical
No contribution to dental
Vacation touching
Pay for training
Downtown hotels less than 20 hr L/O
etc, etc, etc
Trying to negotiate BACK what we had is not a windfall for anyone, but a contractual improvement for everyone!