![]() |
Windfall?
So, if the top UAL guys get there way and have a carve out for the 747, is there any way this can not be construed as a windfall for them? I thought ALPA merger policy precluded any 'windfalls' for any segment of the list?
|
Originally Posted by tailwheel48
(Post 897565)
So, if the top UAL guys get there way and have a carve out for the 747, is there any way this can not be construed as a windfall for them? I thought ALPA merger policy precluded any 'windfalls' for any segment of the list?
|
The JCBA has nothing to do with SLI. Nothing decided at this point should have anything to do with the SLI.
There is no "Carve out" nor is there a "Windfall" until there is integration. The only thing we should be fighting for now is an industry leading contract. After that is done, we can fight for seniority. |
Originally Posted by tailwheel48
(Post 897565)
So, if the top UAL guys get there way and have a carve out for the 747, is there any way this can not be construed as a windfall for them? I thought ALPA merger policy precluded any 'windfalls' for any segment of the list?
|
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 897701)
Not to worry, UALALPO will be happy to throw all UAL furloughees under the bus to make things even out. Top of UAL list to the top and bottom of UAL list stapled. Some things never change.
Nothing has been announced at all. |
hmmmm
Originally Posted by tailwheel48
(Post 897565)
So, if the top UAL guys get there way and have a carve out for the 747, is there any way this can not be construed as a windfall for them? I thought ALPA merger policy precluded any 'windfalls' for any segment of the list?
This would be nothing more than trying to return to the productivity formula from previous contracts prior to bankruptcy. This would be no more of a windfall than trying to get back: Defined contribution plan Defined contribution (company) equal to or greater than old actual contribution No contribution to medical No contribution to dental Vacation touching Pay for training Downtown hotels less than 20 hr L/O etc, etc, etc Trying to negotiate BACK what we had is not a windfall for anyone, but a contractual improvement for everyone! |
Originally Posted by chuckyt1
(Post 897659)
The JCBA has nothing to do with SLI. Nothing decided at this point should have anything to do with the SLI.
There is no "Carve out" nor is there a "Windfall" until there is integration. The only thing we should be fighting for now is an industry leading contract. After that is done, we can fight for seniority. |
If the top 300 UAL pilots are currently 747 CAPTs, they are gonna stay 747 CAPTs...if they are at the "top" of the list, how is that a windfall?
|
Originally Posted by dumpcheck
(Post 899200)
If the top 300 UAL pilots are currently 747 CAPTs, they are gonna stay 747 CAPTs...if they are at the "top" of the list, how is that a windfall?
It would also be wrong to assume the biggest airplane captains are the most senior or the most senior people are always captains. We have tons of senior FOs who could easily hold captain on everything from the 737 to the 777 if they desired. They don't bid it because our contract, work rules and PBS creates a vacuum. Their QOL would suffer by upgrading. Get all this fixed and you will see some movement off the senior FO ranks when vacancies occur in the system. |
Originally Posted by dumpcheck
(Post 899200)
If the top 300 UAL pilots are currently 747 CAPTs, they are gonna stay 747 CAPTs...if they are at the "top" of the list, how is that a windfall?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands