George Bush speaking

Subscribe
1  2  3 
Page 1 of 3
Go to
This is so funny...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhU1y9SoDWc


-LAFF
Reply
Quote: This is so funny...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhU1y9SoDWc


-LAFF

Very Funny! Pretty scary isn't it? Makes ya wonder about the people who voted for him the second time around. Puts a whole new meaning into the "fool me once, fool me twice" phrase.
Reply
everytime he speaks its a good laugh. He should consider doing standup.

..oh wait he already does
Reply
He's got to be the stupidest president ever. He is certainly the stupidest Bush. Oh wait, Niel is worse. Oh, no wait...ah...Jeb, yes Jeb is the most stupid. That's it. Niel then Jeb then George, in that order. Brilliant minds, all of them.

The Bush crime family is one shining example for American kids to emulate. And yes (for those of you about to chime in) I would rather have BJs in the White House than Bombs on Baghdad.
Reply
Quote: Makes ya wonder about the people who voted for him the second time around. Puts a whole new meaning into the "fool me once, fool me twice" phrase.
I don't think that the republicans really won the race in 2004. I think it was more that the democrats LOST IT! No president should ever have been reelected despite a losing war, a sagging economy, skyrocketing energy prices, and the rest of the trouble this country was in during 2004.

The democrats could have won with just about any candidate. They could have won with Lieberman. They could have won with Ghephart (sp?). They probably could have won with Hillary. But the democrats were STUPID and they selected the most liberal member of the senate, John Kerry. Anyone else. Anyone else that was just slightly more towards the center would have won for the democrats.

I am a registered democrat. I voted for Lieberman in the primary. I didn't vote in the main election, but if forced, I probably would have voted for Bush. And I don't think I would have regretted that even today. Why John Kerry???????

There are always going to be hardcore democrats who vote for democrats.
There are always going to be hardcore republicans who vote for republicans.
It is getting the people in the middle that wins you elections.

The democrats alienated theirselves by picking the MOST LIBERAL member of the senate with a wild voting record, and they lost. In my mind, the democrats LOST the election in 2004. The republicans did not WIN it. The democrats LOST IT!
Reply
Quote: He's got to be the stupidest president ever. He is certainly the stupidest Bush. Oh wait, Niel is worse. Oh, no wait...ah...Jeb, yes Jeb is the most stupid. That's it. Niel then Jeb then George, in that order. Brilliant minds, all of them.

The Bush crime family is one shining example for American kids to emulate. And yes (for those of you about to chime in) I would rather have BJs in the White House than Bombs on Baghdad.
Well, no "Bombs on Baghdad" would probably equal more "Bombs in America," as most of the insurgents have flowed to Iraq to fight the "infidel" as opposed to crossing our borders to bomb schools and airlines.

FWIW...

Dave
Reply
" A stark assessment of terrorism trends by American intelligence agencies has found that the American invasion and occupation of Iraq has helped spawn a new generation of Islamic radicalism and that the overall terrorist threat has grown since the Sept. 11 attacks. "
Source: NY Times
Reply
Quote: I don't think that the republicans really won the race in 2004. I think it was more that the democrats LOST IT!
You're exactly right!!
Reply
Quote: " A stark assessment of terrorism trends by American intelligence agencies has found that the American invasion and occupation of Iraq has helped spawn a new generation of Islamic radicalism and that the overall terrorist threat has grown since the Sept. 11 attacks. "
Source: NY Times
The NY Times and LA Times are two of the most incorrect papers there are. However of course it's spawned new terrorist tactics or else the old tactics of flying aircraft into buildings would still be happening. Not to mention that modern day terrorism was started in the Mid-1980's and evolved all this time not because of the United States but because of Russia and it's occupations.

Soldiers will always die overseas. That's what they are for. To fight there and keep them from fighting here. We hate that it happens. However it does and will continue. Terrorism is aimed at the american public not the government. It has nothing to do with occupying foreign soils. Nothing to do with that at all.

Bin Laden was kicked out of his home country and sought refugee in Saudi Arabia. When SA though Iraq was going to invade them Bin Laden offered his help. But SA turned them down for US help. ****ed off Bin Laden which is what led to the attacks on america. It was not about America in Iraq. He was a US ally at one time even. He just twisted arguements after we quit helping him push Russian out of Afghanistan.

I like how they say a new type of Islamic radicalism yet terrorism is at an all time low. Embassy's, world trade centers, subways in japan, shipping ports, airports, ect were under constant attack in the 90's. Now you just hear about some guys that were "thinking" or "trying" to do something. We can spawn all the new radicals they could want but so long as we keep the bombs dropping when we find them they won't be doing it in our back yards.
Reply
on another not i love the OBGYN quote. that's enough to make me vote for him.
Reply
1  2  3 
Page 1 of 3
Go to