There were enough questions that restated the same issue to validate the responses from each pilot. Obviously, the rating questions limit the scope of your response.
The value of the survey is in the "fill in the blocks" sections at the end. We should use this opportunity to clearly tell them what works and what fails miserably, such as how "Fuel Sense" and "Safety First Culture" are opposites when looking at long range overwater international operations with few runway options at the destination end. Remember, if you can't make it in to KIX or NRT, neither will the other 122 airplanes scheduled to land there either!
"Fuel Sense" changed an ANC written policy of no less than all engine taxiing a while back. A ramper got injured after a super twin jet blew a can off of a trailer trying to get into one of the uphill parking spots. Luckily, he saw the can coming and started to make a dash. Unfortunately, the can was faster than he was. Fortunately he wasn't seriously injured or killed. Suddenly, someone at a desk in MEM decided that all engine taxi on a sloping (possibly rain or snow covered...) ramp wasn't such a bad idea after all. Penny-wise, pound and reality foolish.
Put your inputs and clear examples in the "fill in the blanks" area, don't waste the opportunity to give them feedback, but try to limit the emotionalism.
Took me about 15 minutes to finish the survey and another 5 or so to give written "suggestions." Don't waste this opportunity, folks, they don't come that often.