Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilotbiffster
Yeah, Bond/McCaskill bill dictates that SLI be "fair and equitable". You TELL ME what's fair and I'll TELL YOU what's equitable. Putting a 2002 Cal hire above a '97 UAL hire doesn't sound very fair nor equitable to me, but only the arbitrator gets to decide.
First there are no 2002 hires at CAL. But anyway, is putting a UAL 92 hire ahead of a CAL 87 hire fair or equitable?
I guess it depends on where you are sitting to what "fair" is. I know the CAL 87 hires and earlier would love to go along with your DOH or longevity based list. Wide body captains for all those CAL guys.
Remember "fair" is in the eye of the beholder. Was it "fair" that my cousin was going to be in the top 10 at Pan Am for a long portion of his career after being hired in the early 70's and now he is no where near that at his new airline. The list is long with these examples.
Don't get so wrapped up around this seniority list. Not one of us will have a say in it. Each of us will have to decide when the list comes out if we want to be miserable about it for the rest of our lives or move on and enjoy our lives. Both at home and at work. I'm sure more of us will be disappointed with the list than are happy about it.
I'm sure I'll be disappointed with the list, because I am a pilot and we love to complain. But I'm not going to let it destroy me. The sooner we all can do that the sooner we can get on with our lives and maybe even say hi to each other in the crew rooms