|
Originally Posted by PorkyMcFuzz
(Post 3233972)
Any ideas where they may be based? Probably still too early to know I guess
|
Originally Posted by Claxstarr
(Post 3233806)
Ummm sounds like that’s some pretty big news.
Making room for 175s??? |
|
Originally Posted by captive apple
(Post 3233922)
I wonder how big of a nightmare it would be to operate the E2 for Alaska?
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3234369)
wait, it’s the E175E2?
|
Originally Posted by captive apple
(Post 3234372)
It is the same variant, I’m just curious on how big of an operational issue it would be.
|
Originally Posted by threeighteen
(Post 3234387)
99% sure SkyWest can't operate the E2 for AS without violating the UPA, but not 100% sure on it.
|
Originally Posted by TFAYD
(Post 3234954)
not the UPA but DL has a clause preventing it for OO to operate it - even if it isn’t for DL
|
Originally Posted by Flymeaway
(Post 3235282)
OO management signed a contract with one carrier that restricts the service it can offer to another carrier? This would surprise me if true. It would seem to endanger its relationships with the other carriers and set a pretty bad precedent.
|
Have the UA 175s had the 6 seats reinstalled yet? Trying to use yall for my commute tomorrow and the UA website says it’s still 70, but I have found this to be inaccurate as of late.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands