Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Southwest (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/southwest/)
-   -   Hawaii flying (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/southwest/112765-hawaii-flying.html)

RJSAviator76 05-15-2018 08:57 PM


Originally Posted by kingairfun (Post 2594898)
then why would anyone give a **** about 120 minute ETOPS?:)



Maybe because ETOPS 120 covers North Atlantic...

Proximity 05-16-2018 05:29 AM


Originally Posted by RJSAviator76 (Post 2594931)
Maybe because ETOPS 120 covers North Atlantic...

That's a bingo.

I'm sure that the 737MAX will be 180 ETOPS, until then SWA has plenty of 180min 800s too launch HI service. We are still getting 800s, they will be part of the fleet for a long time.

4thLevel 05-16-2018 05:37 PM


Originally Posted by HalinTexas (Post 2594485)
Who? I’d like to hear.

Norwegian, LOT and Air Canada to name a few.

The MAX received ETOPS certification in September of last year.

https://www.boeing.com/features/2017...tes-09-17.page



*The Boeing 737 MAX 8 is certified for 180-Extended Operations, or ETOPS. This means 737 MAX operators can conduct flights on routes that are three hours from alternate airports.

HalinTexas 05-17-2018 08:24 AM


Originally Posted by 4thLevel (Post 2595537)
Norwegian, LOT and Air Canada to name a few.

The MAX received ETOPS certification in September of last year.

https://www.boeing.com/features/2017...tes-09-17.page

The only one of your suggestions that can be proven is Norwegian. They file for 60 minutes but occasionally get 120. That's probably because they were the first to get the type.

Just because Boeing says it is doesn't make it so. Operators get the certifications. I'll stand by the 180 min ETOPS cert. for the MAX. No doubt it is coming.

4thLevel 05-17-2018 11:41 AM


Originally Posted by HalinTexas (Post 2596002)
The only one of your suggestions that can be proven is Norwegian. They file for 60 minutes but occasionally get 120. That's probably because they were the first to get the type.

Just because Boeing says it is doesn't make it so. Operators get the certifications. I'll stand by the 180 min ETOPS cert. for the MAX. No doubt it is coming.

:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Proven???? A quote from Boeing, a picture of our ETOPS aircraft and a list of current operators isn't enough for you I guess.

Dude, you're a piece of work. This all stemmed from that completely inaccurate statement of yours - quoted below. A statement you have continued to walk backwards, as I showed information to the contrary.

But I give up, you're 100% right.


Originally Posted by HalinTexas

No MAXs, anywhere, are ETOPS ready. Not sure when they will be delivered. Wait and see. They will be integrated eventually.
Yes, absolutely. No MAX's anywhere are ETOPS ready, nor have any been delivered.

Boeing and the airlines that operate them, clearly have no idea what they're talking about.

4thLevel 05-17-2018 06:02 PM

United is in for a surprise when they find out they - or their MAX's - don't have 180 min ETOPS.


MAXimum Comfort, MAXimum Efficiency United Airlines to Start Boeing 737 MAX 9 Service
New aircraft to initially operate from carrier's Houston and Los Angeles hubs
February 19, 2018

CHICAGO, Feb. 19, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- United Airlines today announced it has added its newest aircraft type, the Boeing 737 MAX 9, to its domestic flight schedules. The MAX 9 features Boeing's Advanced Technology winglets and fuel efficient engines providing a quieter ride and the ability to fly farther on less fuel.

United expects to begin operating MAX 9 aircraft on June 7, between its hub at Houston's George Bush Intercontinental Airport and five cities. Beginning June 29, United expects to add additional MAX 9 flights from its Houston and Los Angeles hubs including service between Los Angeles and Honolulu.

"The addition of the MAX 9 furthers our efforts to become a more efficient and productive airline. It has better fuel efficiency, lower maintenance costs and does all of this while maximizing customer comfort," said United's Chief Financial Officer Andrew Levy. This year, United will receive 10 new MAX 9 aircraft from Boeing and will continue to add service from its hubs to cities throughout the United States.
https://www.flightglobal.com/assets/...x?itemid=73433

Squallrider 05-18-2018 04:55 AM

Etops class going in school house

MaCrOs 05-18-2018 06:07 AM


Originally Posted by BizPilot (Post 2593032)
Cost of living in Hawaii -

Gallon of milk $8.00
Dozen eggs $7.00

Cheeseburger and fries at Waikiki $24.00 (beverage is extra)

1 bedroom studio apartment $1800/month.

Not at Costco

THEKERNALKLINK 05-28-2018 03:47 PM

250K?
 

Originally Posted by iahflyr (Post 2572518)
CA state income tax is really not as bad as some people make it out to be. If you are married, the first $537,500 of your income is taxed at a marginal tax rate of 9.3%. However, California's income tax is highly progressive. The first $105,224 is taxed at an effective tax rate of only 4.4%. That's actually below average for many states. Even if you make 250k a year, your effective tax rate is 7.2% (Before any write-off's) For comparison, 43 out of 50 states charge state income tax, and the average effective state income tax rate is 5%.

State income tax is deductible on your federal taxes if you itemize. So if you're in a ~30% federal tax bracket, you'll get to write-off 30% of that 7.2% you paid in state taxes on your federal tax return. So your effective state tax rate would be 5%. Throw in some other federal write-offs (mortgage interest, charity, etc...), and your true effective state tax rate gets into the mid 4% range, depending on your situation, for making 250k.

California's property tax rate is also significantly lower than other states (Roughly 1% of the home value, and can not increase more than 2% annually). You'll find that owning property in California is also quite profitable.

People get all worked up over CA state income tax, but ~4.5% of your income if you make 250k is a very small price to pay for living in CA. It's worth it for the weather, scenery, things to do, beaches, mountains, wineries, you name it.

If I wanted to make $250k I'd be flying international for Delta, working 400 hrs per year and spending half of those in the bunk catching up on my beauty sleep, getting in the obligatory landing about once per month. :D

I hope what you are saying is true though, that they don't tax the way the feds do, where the higher percentage is retro to dollar one.

THEKERNALKLINK 05-28-2018 03:51 PM

Million dollar man
 

Originally Posted by UALfoLIFE (Post 2572592)
Try 53 cents per gallon in CA.

Secondly the 13.3% bracket applies to those make more than 1 mil. No SWA pilot is making that on flying alone, nice try lol!

Even my YUUUUUUGE annual pay earned as a reservist in our glamorous military doesn't push me over that million mark, so I should be OK :p


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands