![]() |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 3247120)
Your guess is as good as mine. I'd be willing to bet the options we exercised are growth. I'd also be willing to bet we delay some retirements so we could have options in case things don't go as planned and then we do a little more fleet renewal instead. Again, just a guess.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Smooth at FL450
(Post 3247121)
It's in the 8-k...no reason to guess. 30-35 replacements per year
Must've missed it in the 8K. SWALife says the same thing too. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Zman81
(Post 3247097)
But that’s the way it’s suppose to be. Premium was readily available in the summer. That’s why the union is screaming about over staffing and what it does. Like when times are bad you furlough. Where if you run lean you don’t worry about that.
|
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 3247117)
Very easy to confirm in the latest 8K. Yes I have the charts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by mulcher
(Post 3247164)
I didn’t see the retirement schedule in the 8K. I tried the new and improved SWAlife but I’m lucky to find CWA on that.
It's in there, just above the chart for the new delivery schedule. 30-35 -700s annually for the next 10-15 years. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 3247169)
It's in there, just above the chart for the new delivery schedule. 30-35 -700s annually for the next 10-15 years.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by mulcher
(Post 3247174)
I see that. I remember on SWAlife they had an actual planned schedule. At one time it was fairly precise by tail number when each airframe was coming and going.
Oh! That's news to me. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 3247169)
It's in there, just above the chart for the new delivery schedule. 30-35 -700s annually for the next 10-15 years.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by waterskisabersw
(Post 3247302)
A small correction, but important. 30-35 700s annually, on average, for the next 10-15 years. That doesn't mean 30-35 every year. This being my 6th airline, I don't drink a whole lot of kool-aid, but technically speaking, that does not require them to retire a single airplane next year, or the year after, etc. I will be surprised if they retire any significant number of airplanes next year, especially given what GK and the likes have been saying.
Good call. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
WRT to the -700s, we have what? 450+? Isn’t their average age about 15 years? So if we figure a 20-25 year life cycle then we’ve got 450 -700s that need to be retired in the next 5-10 years. That’s a lot quicker retirement schedule than 30-35 annually.
I just can’t see any of them being around for more than 10 years. My gut feeling is that there will be more MAXes ordered fo accelerate their retirement. Also, let’s not forget the other kicker…..the inevitable acquisition of another airline. Most likely in my humble opinion another airline with a lot of newer Airbuses and a fat order book for even more of them. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:27 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands