![]() |
Yes we do need drastically improved pay rates, along with drastically improved many other items, like disability insurance, loss of license, retirement plans, work rules, and hotel language. And on and on.
I've said this before: to get us up to year 2000 UA 737 captain inflation-adjusted pay rates requires more than a 50% pay rate increase from where we're at right now. Isn't it interesting that SWAPA limited the maximum pay raise increase that you could tell them you are hoping for in the April poll to 40%? What does that tell you? It tells me that SWAPA is anchoring the pilot group to a maximum 40% pay raise as a starting position to work lower from. Moreover, to be able to attain even the 40% pay rate raise that SWAPA has set as its maximum ask from the company AND to also achieve the many other improvements that many of us would like to see requires leverage. Everyone is fixated on the pilot shortage issue as our major source of leverage. Is there actually a genuine pilot shortage issue at Southwest Airlines? That is not a settled question. And, for argument's sake, even if there is a true pilot shortage issue at Southwest, it could go away tomorrow if the economy takes a major dump or some other black swan event materializes. Then what is our leverage if and when that occurs? SWAPA has not even entered into mediation yet two-plus years after the amendable date. I cannot stress enough how important starting the mediation timer is in the process of developing leverage under the RLA. In the eyes of the NMB and in the eyes of the courts, all of this time since the amendable date spent in direct negotiations with the company counts for virtually nothing. To ever have any leverage accrue for us under the RLA, we HAVE TO enter into mediation. Then, we have to spend a significant amount of time in mediation before the NMB would ever consider releasing us from mediation. The actual, real potential for a release from mediation into a cooling-off period and possible self-help is what creates fear in the company's heart of a "book-away" phenomenon developing among our passengers as news reports begin to circulate that Southwest pilots might actually, for real go on strike at some point in the not-too-distant future. Going through mediation is a necessary condition for obtaining that leverage. Leverage under the RLA is always available to us. It does not depend on the economy or a pilot shortage. But, leverage under the RLA is only available to us if we effectively play the RLA game. Right now, we have ZERO leverage under the RLA. We will continue to until we've spent a significant amount of time in mediation. We could have filed for mediation 12 months, 18 months, 24 months ago. We could have been allowing the clock to run this whole time - and allowing our leverage under the RLA to build. The clock would have started ticking had we filed for mediation. But we haven't yet filed. And the clock hasn't started ticking. |
Originally Posted by Lewbronski
(Post 3415941)
Yes we do need drastically improved pay rates, along with drastically improved many other items, like disability insurance, loss of license, retirement plans, work rules, and hotel language. And on and on.
I've said this before: to get us up to year 2000 UA 737 captain inflation-adjusted pay rates requires more than a 50% pay rate increase from where we're at right now. Isn't it interesting that SWAPA limited the maximum pay raise increase that you could tell them you are hoping for in the April poll to 40%? What does that tell you? It tells me that SWAPA is anchoring the pilot group to a maximum 40% pay raise as a starting position to work lower from. |
It is imperative that we keep our eyes on what other airlines are doing in terms of contract renewal. Personally, I could care less what the the current 737 or 787 contract rates are at other carriers. I am a lot more concerned with what their next contract rate will be.
I think which ever airline of the big 4 signs first is not only going to set the bar for pay rates, work rules, LTD, inflation protection and healthcare, but be at a huge disadvantage. The benefactors are going to be the pilots of the other carriers. I have no problem delaying to let another carrier go first. I think we should be aggressive in pursuing all avenues to move toward a contract, but I really do not want Southwest to be the first to sign. However, we need to be in position to leverage everything we have immediately following that signature. |
I’m liking what I’m reading here but then I fly with many who are just plain out to lunch.
|
Originally Posted by itsokimapilot
(Post 3416272)
Absolutely agree. The best way to make us more attractive is to give us real industry leading pay rates. 12 year Capt rate equal to wide body Capt rates. FO rates equal to narrow body Capt rates at other carriers. This solves our fleet diversity, upgrade time and career earnings issues we face.
Say you're running a pizza place, and your boss says "The only way we're going to be a successful pizza place, and get customers, and make money, and win is to make a cheaper pizza." What are you going to do if you want to win, if you want to be rewarded by your boss? You're going to keep trying to make a cheaper pizza you're going to make thinner and thinner crust to save on flour you're going to use less and less sauce to save on tomatoes you'll buy canned rather than fresh vegetables frozen rather than fresh meat. Sooner or later somebody's going to get the bright idea to take half the cheese off, or all the cheese off, or make the pizza out of cardboard. Well, you can make a pizza so cheap nobody wants to eat it. Trust me on this - we did it. So you're going to be making these incredibly cheap pizzas and the people in the cost department and the people in the supply department are going to be happy and high-fiving each other. They'll be saying "We're winning back here" and meanwhile upfront where the orders have dried up and the customers are complaining and no pizzas are selling you're not winning at all. In the end, it's like a canoe - the back end can be winning while the front end is sinking. If any part of the canoe is sinking, nobody cares how good the rest of the canoe is doing because the whole thing is going to sink. |
Excellent analogy RJS. Perfect.
|
But.
The Canoe. It's right where he wants it to be. |
Originally Posted by Caveman
(Post 3416388)
But.
The Canoe. It's right where he wants it to be. |
Originally Posted by Caveman
(Post 3416388)
But.
The Canoe. It's right where he wants it to be. |
Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
(Post 3416312)
What makes you think our bean counters have any vision beyond what's on their spreadsheet? Until they can quantify this on their spreadsheets and had multiple studies done to prove it to them, it'll be way too late. Reminds me of a book From Worst to First by Gordon Bethune and the pizza example he used:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:12 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands