Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Is domestic scope/codeshare an issue? >

Is domestic scope/codeshare an issue?

Search

Notices

Is domestic scope/codeshare an issue?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2015 | 08:28 AM
  #1  
Sr. Barco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Default Is domestic scope/codeshare an issue?

Paraphrased from TOF regarding Casey's letter:

Regarding the domestic scope/codeshare of which you speak...Correct me if I'm wrong but most regional airlines can barely staff themselves adequately today. How are they going to staff themselves with more flying via increased codeshare/relaxed scope at their mainline partners? This is a serious question. Just go the the Regional forum on airline pilot central and read for a few minutes. Even the best Regionals are critically short. They have no FO reserves and because of it Captains frequently fly trips together. This after only 3,000 retirements since 2012. There are 23,500 age 65 retirements scheduled in the next 10 years. Delta is cancelling lift with their regional feed and moving lots of flying in house as we speak.

What am I missing? I'm not suggesting we give away scope/codeshare protections. I'm just wondering if this is even an issue. How does the airline industry expect to find more pilots than they've ever had to and get them to fly for less pay at theoretically larger regional airlines?
Reply
Old 11-12-2015 | 08:41 AM
  #2  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sr. Barco
Paraphrased from TOF regarding Casey's letter:

Regarding the domestic scope/codeshare of which you speak...Correct me if I'm wrong but most regional airlines can barely staff themselves adequately today. How are they going to staff themselves with more flying via increased codeshare/relaxed scope at their mainline partners? This is a serious question. Just go the the Regional forum on airline pilot central and read for a few minutes. Even the best Regionals are critically short. They have no FO reserves and because of it Captains frequently fly trips together. This after only 3,000 retirements since 2012. There are 23,500 age 65 retirements scheduled in the next 10 years. Delta is cancelling lift with their regional feed and moving lots of flying in house as we speak.

What am I missing? I'm not suggesting we give away scope/codeshare protections. I'm just wondering if this is even an issue. How does the airline industry expect to find more pilots than they've ever had to and get them to fly for less pay at theoretically larger regional airlines?
That's a good question. Wonder if Casey will see it, and if he does, I wonder if he'll answer?
Reply
Old 11-12-2015 | 08:44 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 300
Default

As someone in the pool waiting to start class, I don't want to see any SWA routes or planes unless they're flown by SWA pilots.

I spent over a decade at a regional while mainline voted away scope for a chance at saving pensions (didn't happen) and better pay. Once it's gone, it's never coming back.

Scope is the single most important thing in the contract. Without it you end up like UAL, AA, and DL where the majority of your feed is flown by subcontractors for pathetic pay.
Reply
Old 11-12-2015 | 11:27 AM
  #4  
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,573
Likes: 282
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Default

Originally Posted by Sr. Barco
Paraphrased from TOF regarding Casey's letter:

Regarding the domestic scope/codeshare of which you speak...Correct me if I'm wrong but most regional airlines can barely staff themselves adequately today. How are they going to staff themselves with more flying via increased codeshare/relaxed scope at their mainline partners? This is a serious question. Just go the the Regional forum on airline pilot central and read for a few minutes. Even the best Regionals are critically short. They have no FO reserves and because of it Captains frequently fly trips together. This after only 3,000 retirements since 2012. There are 23,500 age 65 retirements scheduled in the next 10 years. Delta is cancelling lift with their regional feed and moving lots of flying in house as we speak.

What am I missing? I'm not suggesting we give away scope/codeshare protections. I'm just wondering if this is even an issue. How does the airline industry expect to find more pilots than they've ever had to and get them to fly for less pay at theoretically larger regional airlines?
Insert facepalm emoticon here X
Reply
Old 11-12-2015 | 12:17 PM
  #5  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 34
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Sr. Barco
Paraphrased from TOF regarding Casey's letter:

Regarding the domestic scope/codeshare of which you speak...Correct me if I'm wrong but most regional airlines can barely staff themselves adequately today. How are they going to staff themselves with more flying via increased codeshare/relaxed scope at their mainline partners? This is a serious question. Just go the the Regional forum on airline pilot central and read for a few minutes. Even the best Regionals are critically short. They have no FO reserves and because of it Captains frequently fly trips together. This after only 3,000 retirements since 2012. There are 23,500 age 65 retirements scheduled in the next 10 years. Delta is cancelling lift with their regional feed and moving lots of flying in house as we speak.

What am I missing? I'm not suggesting we give away scope/codeshare protections. I'm just wondering if this is even an issue. How does the airline industry expect to find more pilots than they've ever had to and get them to fly for less pay at theoretically larger regional airlines?
Someone looking to give away domestic codeshare?

JetBlue | Partner airlines

Your threat isn't just from outsourcing to regional fee-for-departure carriers, it is giving domestic codeshare to companies like us at JB, VX, NK, F9, HA, AS
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 02:41 AM
  #6  
HalinTexas's Avatar
Feeling blessed.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 564
Likes: 6
From: Happily coasting in the left seat until it ends.
Default

Never surrender scope. Ever.
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 02:53 AM
  #7  
gipple's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HalinTexas
Never surrender scope. Ever.
So many at SWA just can't grasp that simple concept.
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 05:29 AM
  #8  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default

Well, I'm certainly not going to vote it in with the HOPE that another carrier can't staff the work. What kind of crazy logic is that!?

I'm a firm believer that the "shortage" is a PR scheme created by the airline industry to try to scare regulators into not implementing more regulation (FAR 117). We certainly don't have a shortage of applicants, nor does any other major. There will always be some juniors salivating for the chance to jump into an ERJ for $20k/yr....
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 01:51 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by HalinTexas
Never surrender scope. Ever.
Originally Posted by gipple
So many at SWA just can't grasp that simple concept.
To be fair, the pilots at SWA grasp it better than any other US airline!
Reply
Old 11-17-2015 | 04:05 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 747
Likes: 4
From: Blue fifi flogger
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Someone looking to give away domestic codeshare?

JetBlue | Partner airlines

Your threat isn't just from outsourcing to regional fee-for-departure carriers, it is giving domestic codeshare to companies like us at JB, VX, NK, F9, HA, AS
This plus 1000. Not to mention that as your business model matures and you start thinking widebodies make sense, you can instead enjoy your company putting its code on 20 different foreign carriers instead of flying your own metal with your own pilots.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Doc1010
Technical
7
06-17-2014 03:58 PM
TANSTAAFL
Major
728
10-30-2013 01:18 PM
avi8tor4life
United
17
01-03-2013 09:52 PM
captjns
Major
178
11-14-2012 03:53 AM
calcapt
Hangar Talk
11
05-24-2006 11:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices