![]() |
Originally Posted by 319wisperer
(Post 2535970)
So do you share that same rational for the loss of transition? Are you ****ed that the guys who regularly bid transition conflicts ruined that for everyone? You do know that you can tell the company that we’re not giving up reserve rules or any other QOL provisions for substandard pay by voting no.
I laughed out loud the first time I heard/read about the old transition conflict rules when I was job searching prior to coming to Spirit. Seemed funny as heck that something like that could sneak into a contract. Trading it away for an updated payscale was inevitable, so nobody "ruined transition". It was doomed the day the company realized what they'd signed. |
Originally Posted by flensr
(Post 2536136)
"Everyone knows" that transition conflicts made it into the 2010 contract by mistake and wouldn't last into the next one. It was a gross error by the company and everyone knew that, except for the handful that used it so much that they began to rely on it and consider it to be a natural born right.
I laughed out loud the first time I heard/read about the old transition conflict rules when I was job searching prior to coming to Spirit. Seemed funny as heck that something like that could sneak into a contract. Trading it away for an updated payscale was inevitable, so nobody "ruined transition". It was doomed the day the company realized what they'd signed. Either both transition and reserve drops are gone (if this TA passes) as both were taken advantage of at a big expense to the company or both are going away to put us in line with the industry standard (if the NC is to be believed). But people like Tool can’t just slam the peeps that made strategic reserve drops without mentioning people who made strategic transition conflicts or peeps that prob called in sick one too many times on account of a sick parent, etc. |
If you turn pilots against pilots, they win.
|
Originally Posted by 319wisperer
(Post 2536168)
I was merely making the point that it’s disingenuous calling the guys who work the reserve system to their advantage “turds”, yet not having the same dismay for the guys that work transition conflicts.
Either both transition and reserve drops are gone (if this TA passes) as both were taken advantage of at a big expense to the company or both are going away to put us in line with the industry standard (if the NC is to be believed). But people like Tool can’t just slam the peeps that made strategic reserve drops without mentioning people who made strategic transition conflicts or peeps that prob called in sick one too many times on account of a sick parent, etc. |
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
(Post 2536255)
Outside looking in.... Why is it always described as taking advantage or abusing the contract when you use the contract to maximize your pay/QOL? The company is going to try everything to skirt the contract and abuse the pilots.
|
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
(Post 2536255)
Outside looking in.... Why is it always described as taking advantage or abusing the contract when you use the contract to maximize your pay/QOL? The company is going to try everything to skirt the contract and abuse the pilots.
Yes it was simply "using" the contract as written, but there are an awful lot of perfectly legal things that are destructive enough to just not be done. And if they ARE done, it's used against the pilot group. I dunno how other people feel but I'm big-picture enough to resist the urge to do that sort of thing that gets me basically a month paid vacation at the expense of crapping on everyone when the next contract is negotiated. |
Originally Posted by NKSpilot
(Post 2536245)
If you turn pilots against pilots, they win.
Sure, checkerboarding is poetic justice considering the schenanigans the company has pulled with getting a new contract done. But it really is destructive. Anyone who thought that there would be no consequences for doing that just because the contract permitted it was pretty short-sighted IMHO. |
Originally Posted by flensr
(Post 2536421)
Because in addition to people just working the contract to our advantage, spirit's reserve rules permitted things like a strange technique of checkerboarding reserve assignments by swapping half your schedule with another reserve pilot, basically sitting reserve every other day of the month. That effectively takes both pilots off the schedule completely for the whole month, with pay. That sort of thing doesn't help anyone and it was used by the company during mediation to justify eliminating nearly ALL reserve scheduling flexibility in the new contract, showing that it actually hurt the pilot group as a whole.
Yes it was simply "using" the contract as written, but there are an awful lot of perfectly legal things that are destructive enough to just not be done. And if they ARE done, it's used against the pilot group. I dunno how other people feel but I'm big-picture enough to resist the urge to do that sort of thing that gets me basically a month paid vacation at the expense of crapping on everyone when the next contract is negotiated. |
Originally Posted by BKbigfish
(Post 2536458)
The way that you phrased this is suspect to say the least. We do not have to “swap” with another pilot to “checkerboard.” Flensr is not one of us... and if he is he’s a total moron. Your pilot faking game is weak bro... try again.
|
Originally Posted by 319wisperer
(Post 2536464)
Exactly. He would know that reserves swapping between each other was an impossibility because of the inability of reserves to pick up or trade over GDOs. This only changed via arbitration that was won less than 2 weeks ago.
|
Originally Posted by flensr
(Post 2536422)
Some pilots do selfish things that hurt everyone else, and then get all self-righteous when they're called out on it. The company doesn't have to do anything to make that happen, when a select group of people cause contract concessions through anti-social behavior.
Sure, checkerboarding is poetic justice considering the schenanigans the company has pulled with getting a new contract done. But it really is destructive. Anyone who thought that there would be no consequences for doing that just because the contract permitted it was pretty short-sighted IMHO. |
Originally Posted by BKbigfish
(Post 2536472)
This idiot’s (Flensr’s) first post was less than a year ago and he exclusively comments on the NK forums. You paid management *****s are so easy to spot it’s pathetic.
|
Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
(Post 2536479)
Are you saying everyone is supposed to comment on other airline boards that they don’t work for in order not be labeled “paid management”?
|
Originally Posted by BKbigfish
(Post 2536488)
LOL... make sure to jump in and defend yourself with your other screen name. It isn’t obvious at all...
|
Originally Posted by BKbigfish
(Post 2536473)
You suck at your job. I seriously can’t believe anybody pays you to do this.
|
Originally Posted by flensr
(Post 2536494)
You're pretty paranoid bro. 3 posts trying to call me out? Here, have a cream soda.
|
Originally Posted by BKbigfish
(Post 2536502)
Hahaha... ok. You and Lincoln just happen to be perusing the NK forums at midnight on a Saturday desperately defending against management troll accusations. Here’s a tip for your next job... try to not be so obvious. Just treat this as a learning experience and try and do better on your next union busting contract gig. I wish you “both” the best of luck in your future endeavors.
|
Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
(Post 2536505)
So because we are posting on the forums at midnight on a Saturday night (which you are also doing) we are management trolls?
|
Originally Posted by BKbigfish
(Post 2536509)
I figured this would be your response although I wasn’t sure which one of your screen names you would use. It’s the fact that you “both” happen to be on the NK forums, vehemently denying being management paid trolls at the exact same time at an odd hour of the day. I am doing this out of love ❤️. I really just want you to excel at your career as a union buster and make your mom proud.
|
Originally Posted by BKbigfish
(Post 2536509)
I figured this would be your response although I wasn’t sure which one of your screen names you would use. It’s the fact that you “both” happen to be on the NK forums, vehemently denying being management paid trolls at the exact same time at an odd hour of the day. I am doing this out of love ❤️. I really just want you to excel at your career as a union buster and make your mom proud.
Since you're already mad, go ahead and read one of my other company management shade posts, highlighting my defense of the company over the last year. https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/s...uspicious.html Or you can keep crying in your cheerios since it seems clear you're one of those guys who's upset they're being called out for making things worse instead of better. Don't forget to vote, don't want your rage to keep you from making a few clicks before the deadline. |
Originally Posted by flensr
(Post 2536710)
Both paranoid and delusional. Maybe you're just mad that the truth hurts?
Since you're already mad, go ahead and read one of my other company management shade posts, highlighting my defense of the company over the last year. https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/s...uspicious.html Or you can keep crying in your cheerios since it seems clear you're one of those guys who's upset they're being called out for making things worse instead of better. Don't forget to vote, don't want your rage to keep you from making a few clicks before the deadline. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:37 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands