![]() |
Looks like United is about to ask for paycuts
Let’s get this straight right now. This is virus situation is bad. No amount of paycuts will save anything. Those of us that have been around or been furloughed know that paycuts will never do anything but get you paid less. They won’t save jobs and they won’t save the company. When I was furloughed paycuts were voted for and the furloughs happened anyway. SnapBack language was in place to get the money back and violated forever. The pay never comes back and the paycuts don’t help anything.
|
Yeah I’d rather come back to full pay after my furlough then a crappy pay rate. I’ll just drive door dash in the mean time. Business is booming.
|
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2999593)
Let’s get this straight right now. This is virus situation is bad. No amount of paycuts will save anything. Those of us that have been around or been furloughed know that paycuts will never do anything but get you paid less. They won’t save jobs and they won’t save the company. When I was furloughed paycuts were voted for and the furloughs happened anyway. SnapBack language was in place to get the money back and violated forever. The pay never comes back and the paycuts don’t help anything.
On a side note, I was reading in dismay section 23 of the contract: “The Company will be excused from compliance with the pro-visions of Section 23.A.3 and Section 23.G in the event that a circumstance over which the Company does not have control causes the furlough” So basically the company can furlough without honoring the 30-day notice and no furlough PAY! A freaking email can be sent out saying “don’t come to work tomorrow” and that would be it. Please tell me I’m reading it wrong. |
There could be many furlough mitigation strategies if or when it comes to that but we shouldn’t discuss them here. Paycuts are never the answer. It’s a convenient time to come for pay and when it’s convenient for us they stall and don’t pay. There is no way to know what the next few months will hold but it’s way to early for any airline to come for pay. Layoffs yes put paycuts way too early. It will test our nerve for sure. I find United’s timing impeccably convenient.
When I got furloughed I came back at lower pay and never reached my pre furlough payrate at that company. The paycuts accomplished nothing. |
I have a hard time even considering IF we get to pay cuts when I still see the ridiculous amount of waste on the line each day. Pilots taking a cut to help subsidize the running of the #1 engine when it takes a gate agent 10 minutes to show.
How about that plot of land in FLL goes up for sale? |
Originally Posted by Omniscient
(Post 2999665)
I have a hard time even considering IF we get to pay cuts when I still see the ridiculous amount of waste on the line each day. Pilots taking a cut to help subsidize the running of the #1 engine when it takes a gate agent 10 minutes to show.
How about that plot of land in FLL goes up for sale? |
Originally Posted by Omniscient
(Post 2999665)
I have a hard time even considering IF we get to pay cuts when I still see the ridiculous amount of waste on the line each day. Pilots taking a cut to help subsidize the running of the #1 engine when it takes a gate agent 10 minutes to show.
How about that plot of land in FLL goes up for sale? |
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 2999692)
And who would buy it with the economy collapsing?
China......duhhhhhhhhhh haha |
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 2999610)
Yeah I’d rather come back to full pay after my furlough then a crappy pay rate. I’ll just drive door dash in the mean time. Business is booming.
|
Originally Posted by Jay1122
(Post 2999711)
That would be assuming that you have an airline to come back to.
|
Originally Posted by Jay1122
(Post 2999711)
That would be assuming that you have an airline to come back to.
^^^^ This. You guys are talking furloughs, I’m much more concerned we won’t have an airline. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 2999736)
^^^^ This. You guys are talking furloughs, I’m much more concerned we won’t have an airline.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
When Ted and Bendo come forward and offer to cut their salary 50% and no bonuses, then we can discuss salary concessions.
|
Where's my quid??? 😬
|
Originally Posted by RemoveB4flght
(Post 3000074)
When Ted and Bendo come forward and offer to cut their salary 50% and no bonuses, then we can discuss salary concessions.
|
I would be willing to reduce our profit sharing though.
|
Originally Posted by NKSpilot
(Post 3000300)
I would be willing to reduce our profit sharing though.
definitely. As team players and company people we should agree to reduce our profit sharing percentage... it's the right thing to do |
Now we're getting somewhere here.
Plane Coffee |
I love this group
|
Btw creative solutions starting to happen at other airlines besides United that don’t include paycuts.
further United hasn’t formally asked for them yet but it appeared they were interested. for all we know Spirit needs nothing but I wanted to get in front of the fear wave about paycuts. every airline flushed tons on money in corporate welfare from the 2018 tax law into stock buy backs when it could’ve been kept for a rainy day. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 3000339)
Btw creative solutions starting to happen at other airlines besides United that don’t include paycuts.
further United hasn’t formally asked for them yet but it appeared they were interested. for all we know Spirit needs nothing but I wanted to get in front of the fear wave about paycuts. every airline flushed tons on money in corporate welfare from the 2018 tax law into stock buy backs when it could’ve been kept for a rainy day. I agree that the stock buy back money should have been put aside for a bigger emergency fund, but no one knew what that meant until now. I suspect the new gold standard for airline health will be the ability to shutter the doors for 4-6 weeks and still be viable at the end of the year. |
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 3000414)
I suspect the new gold standard for airline health will be the ability to shutter the doors for 4-6 weeks and still be viable at the end of the year.
|
Originally Posted by flyboyike
(Post 3002351)
Not to defend any particular airline's fiscal practices, but how many businesses of ANY kind can do that?
Traditional thinking was that idle cash was useless, why give up equity if you’re not going to use the cash? I think this will change things, as I’m sure there will be strings attached to the forthcoming govt money. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2999593)
Let’s get this straight right now. This is virus situation is bad. No amount of paycuts will save anything. Those of us that have been around or been furloughed know that paycuts will never do anything but get you paid less. They won’t save jobs and they won’t save the company. When I was furloughed paycuts were voted for and the furloughs happened anyway. SnapBack language was in place to get the money back and violated forever. The pay never comes back and the paycuts don’t help anything.
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 3000339)
Btw creative solutions starting to happen at other airlines besides United that don’t include paycuts.
further United hasn’t formally asked for them yet but it appeared they were interested. I'm hoping you tell us that your source is one of idiots who post on APC or perhaps the JBLU FA who started the 'United is buying JBLU' rumor a couple of years ago that didn't really die until coronavirus. I have, to date, seen zero from either UALALPA or UAL management hinting at paycuts. Not much overall news, except that we can expect to be offered more leaves of absence (0 hrs pay) and surplus reduction lines (50 hrs pay). If one views those as paycuts, OK - but not a pay rate cut. It's safe to say that there are some pretty intense discussions going on right now at all airlines and I'm sure there's a whole gamut of options on the table at every airline. All we can do is prepare for the worst and hope for the best. We're all in the airline business so we're all screwed. Take care of each other and watch out for fellow workers who get deeply depressed - there have already been a couple of suicides out there. . In closing, this calls for a little bit of Ozzy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9yYJ6ZAYns All the best to everyone. |
Originally Posted by flyboyike
(Post 3002351)
Not to defend any particular airline's fiscal practices, but how many businesses of ANY kind can do that?
This is may be the new one. And maybe not so hard to achieve if things like stock buybacks are stopped or at least delayed until that level of liquidity is attained by the respective organization. Honestly, that kind of emergency fund is recommended for our personal lives. It’s not so far fetched for it to be valid in the business sector. There may be s legislative benchmark set going forward as a strong attached to any government assistance, or as part of some blowback to the stock buy backs. |
So if a person gets his paychecks and spends money to buy things, had a 6 month emergency fund, and decides to spend some of his extra cash on a vacation, new surround sound system and a boat...and then an economic collapse happens, so we say “you shouldn’t have spent money on luxury items like boats, you should have had 2 years savings!” So that person shouldn’t be eligible for financial assistance?
You can’t use hindsight for the airlines and say “they should not have done stock buybacks, they should have had unprecedented levels of liquidity, in case of a global pandemic that nobody had forecasting models for or if Godzilla himself walked in from the ocean and destroyed all cities in his wake. Just as the banks learned that more liquidity is needed for what was once unforeseen events, the same will be needed for airlines and should be tied to any government backed loan. I don’t remember anyone ever saying the airlines needed more liquidity in the bank for a mass event like this. I do remember everyone asking for more profit sharing and higher wages from that idle cash. Hey, don’t blame anyone for that, but let’s not act like the pilots on this forum were screaming for more cash in the bank. We didn’t like that the cash was going to buy backs and not the pilots. revisionist history perhaps.... |
To add to that, popular opinion up to this point was that extra liquidity would lead to a company being a merger target.
|
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3002389)
What is your source for this information? I have been monitoring multiple sources and have not seen anything of the sort (United looking for paycuts) as of now.
I'm hoping you tell us that your source is one of idiots who post on APC or perhaps the JBLU FA who started the 'United is buying JBLU' rumor a couple of years ago that didn't really die until coronavirus. I have, to date, seen zero from either UALALPA or UAL management hinting at paycuts. Not much overall news, except that we can expect to be offered more leaves of absence (0 hrs pay) and surplus reduction lines (50 hrs pay). If one views those as paycuts, OK - but not a pay rate cut. It's safe to say that there are some pretty intense discussions going on right now at all airlines and I'm sure there's a whole gamut of options on the table at every airline. All we can do is prepare for the worst and hope for the best. We're all in the airline business so we're all screwed. Take care of each other and watch out for fellow workers who get deeply depressed - there have already been a couple of suicides out there. . In closing, this calls for a little bit of Ozzy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9yYJ6ZAYns All the best to everyone. Outside of Oscar and Kirbys letter there hasn’t been anything. |
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 3002450)
To add to that, popular opinion up to this point was that extra liquidity would lead to a company being a merger target.
|
Originally Posted by CAirBear
(Post 3002489)
It has been determined that the OP over on the United thread that started that, had interestingly enough, created that username in March of 2020. Seems to be a troll account.
Outside of Oscar and Kirbys letter there hasn’t been anything. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3002577)
That's where poison pill strategies MUST be employed by all airlines. We're tremendous targets for greenmailers and robber barons because the business is so capital intensive.
|
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3002389)
What is your source for this information? I have been monitoring multiple sources and have not seen anything of the sort (United looking for paycuts) as of now.
I'm hoping you tell us that your source is one of idiots who post on APC or perhaps the JBLU FA who started the 'United is buying JBLU' rumor a couple of years ago that didn't really die until coronavirus. I have, to date, seen zero from either UALALPA or UAL management hinting at paycuts. Not much overall news, except that we can expect to be offered more leaves of absence (0 hrs pay) and surplus reduction lines (50 hrs pay). If one views those as paycuts, OK - but not a pay rate cut. It's safe to say that there are some pretty intense discussions going on right now at all airlines and I'm sure there's a whole gamut of options on the table at every airline. All we can do is prepare for the worst and hope for the best. We're all in the airline business so we're all screwed. Take care of each other and watch out for fellow workers who get deeply depressed - there have already been a couple of suicides out there. . In closing, this calls for a little bit of Ozzy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9yYJ6ZAYns All the best to everyone. I’m Not close to retirement but I’ve been at this long enough to know that airline managements will absolutely use a major short term crisis to lock in long term concessions. Even if they have snap back provisions, they will be violated and the pay never returns. I’m also aware of the major cascading training costs involved at carriers with multiple types when it comes to furloughs. Management always tries what’s easy. This is not new. again they haven’t asked so far but United management was the first to release the “we need to control payroll” message and I’ve seen this movie before. I think Alpa national knows this is huge but also short term and hopefully are working with each airline’s MECs to work on big solutions but that have us all that want to be back working as quickly as possible and at full pay. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 3002722)
I posted this the night of that Oscar sent the email to employees. A family member forwarded it to me. He spoke of executives taking paycuts and needing to control payroll costs. When a CEO and other executives take a paycut it’s to set an example. The money is inconsequential to the health of a company to burns billions but it’s hard to ask for one without taking one yourself. So to me that says appears to be “looking” for paycuts. That was also before APA released their voluntary leave packages. It looks like and are are two different things.
I’m Not close to retirement but I’ve been at this long enough to know that airline managements will absolutely use a major short term crisis to lock in long term concessions. Even if they have snap back provisions, they will be violated and the pay never returns. I’m also aware of the major cascading training costs involved at carriers with multiple types when it comes to furloughs. Management always tries what’s easy. This is not new. again they haven’t asked so far but United management was the first to release the “we need to control payroll” message and I’ve seen this movie before. I think Alpa national knows this is huge but also short term and hopefully are working with each airline’s MECs to work on big solutions but that have us all that want to be back working as quickly as possible and at full pay. We're still waiting to rebid next month, although I suspect it will pretty much be 50 hour surplus reduction lines for everyone … perhaps even a lower number than 50 hours? I don't know and am just waiting for information from leadership. Will there be paycuts? Us keyboard warriors are hardcore on no paycuts, but we all know that resolve can fade rapidly when faced even more undesirable choices. So I have learned to not comment with 'full pay til the last day' because that never seems to happen. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3002577)
That's where poison pill strategies MUST be employed by all airlines. We're tremendous targets for greenmailers and robber barons because the business is so capital intensive.
so how concerned should we be with $1,000,000,000.00 in the bank (rapidly diminishing) and a market cap of $600,000,000.00 and falling |
Also getting emails from big retailers that say they are now closing but will continue to pay employees salaries and benefits. It’s going to get less palatable for big businesses to screw over employees this time around
|
Btw we all have an ALPA call to action in your email about prioritizing pilots in any assistance package to the airlines.
63,000 ALPA members and there is zero reason 63,000 of these shouldn’t go out today. two clicks and it sends. You don’t have to do anything |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 3003020)
Btw we all have an ALPA call to action in your email about prioritizing pilots in any assistance package to the airlines.
63,000 ALPA members and there is zero reason 63,000 of these shouldn’t go out today. two clicks and it sends. You don’t have to do anything |
Fulllpay to the last day.
Everytime the furlough mitigation strategies kick in, the only thing ensured is that those management have slated for furlough go out to the street lighter in the pocket book and those left are making a good bit less than the CBA stipulates . Unfortunately, union leadership never seems able to grasp this axiom . Carrier after carrier, union after union. |
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 3002922)
so how concerned should we be with $1,000,000,000.00 in the bank (rapidly diminishing) and a market cap of $600,000,000.00 and falling
|
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 3002922)
so how concerned should we be with $1,000,000,000.00 in the bank (rapidly diminishing) and a market cap of $600,000,000.00 and falling
It's not a concern at the moment because no one's going to loan him a bunch of money on airline assets. But if the industry starts recovering, it will be something to be concerned about. And this applies to all airlines, both big and small. Smaller is easier, but big is also possible. But this is not the 5 meter target; we have other things to worry about in this industry right now. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:07 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands