Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Spirit (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/spirit/)
-   -   BUR-LAS Scenic Route. WTF??? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/spirit/136815-bur-las-scenic-route-wtf.html)

Pilot4000 03-02-2022 01:30 AM


Originally Posted by flydiamond (Post 3381207)
It doesn’t matter what it any inspections are required. What matters is that a plane may not be dispatched unless it is going to be below the max landing weight at the point of landing. You cannot simply land above that weight for convenience and write it up upon arrival. Mechanical or medical diversion would be a different story.


Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo (Post 3381212)
Haha. What FlyDiamond said; you really think the company can dispatch a plane with a known landing weight thousands of pounds overweight, because it’s just a sign off?

Jyri, is that you?


Originally Posted by bruhaha (Post 3381215)
mechanics did the overweight landing inspection last night in 15 minutes, All they did was pull a load 15 report and found that lateral and vertical acceleration at the moment of landing was within limits…. Then they signed it off….

brakes however, took 2 hours to cool to the point where we could taxi again at a station that had no brake fans

OK, guess that was a stupid question.


Originally Posted by Excargodog (Post 3381313)

Well, in my defense they landed in LAS......

minnymum 03-02-2022 03:05 AM


Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo (Post 3381180)
Yeah, that has MX swap written all over it, to a plane with too much fuel.

Would make sense if it was LAS-BUR, but this is BUR-LAS.

Minepza 03-02-2022 03:42 AM

Why would they be flying at FL380 to burn off fuel?

CincoDeMayo 03-02-2022 04:25 AM


Originally Posted by minnymum (Post 3381370)
Would make sense if it was LAS-BUR, but this is BUR-LAS.

Ouch, good point. Didn’t see that.

How about…fueler in Burbank was so busy on the “Gram” that he fueled the plane to 40,000 pounds instead of 10,000 pounds.

That “gram” be distracting people

turbojet28 03-02-2022 07:26 AM

Maybe there was a sigmet for severe turbulence on the more direct route and they didn’t want to risk it.

Halon1211 03-02-2022 09:20 AM

I heard that their was an reports aliens and UFO’s along the route and they didn’t want to risk it.

Halon1211 03-24-2022 07:23 AM

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CbXmc...dium=copy_link

Anyone know if this is recent?

sioux8ships 03-24-2022 07:29 AM


Originally Posted by Halon1211 (Post 3394067)

Ground crew said it happened last week.

FNGFO 03-24-2022 07:38 AM


Originally Posted by sioux8ships (Post 3394071)
Ground crew said it happened last week.

Yeah. About a week ago. Love three rampers right under it doing nothing to stop it.

CincoDeMayo 03-24-2022 08:36 AM


Originally Posted by FNGFO (Post 3394075)
Yeah. About a week ago. Love three rampers right under it doing nothing to stop it.

These are the same type of rampers who stand directly in front of a cart in the safety zone and don’t understand why we won’t taxi in


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:26 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands