![]() |
JCBA during a recession.
With all indicators pointing to a impending recession, does anybody want to guess what contract negotiations with the new Spirit and Frontier pilot group will look like during a recession?
Will management try to use that as an excuse to low ball our pay rates while they still boast how we are “recession proof”? Or will they recognize that they need pilots here and try to keep wages and benefits competitive. |
I wouldn't jump to conclusions on f9 just yet...something tells me B6 isn't done playing hardball...either way I think attrition and demand will still be "strong". It will however be a great tool for whoever is managing whatever airline to drag feet and pretend there's no problems
Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk |
B6 is done. They can keep trying but he board clearly spoke. And if they somehow accomplish a hostile bid the government will squash it. F9 is our dancing partner, And I’m very thankful for that. Negotiations will be a fight but they always are. Being the Nations 5th largest airline and attrition being what it is, we can, and should score nothing less than a great contract.
|
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3418977)
With all indicators pointing to a impending recession, does anybody want to guess what contract negotiations with the new Spirit and Frontier pilot group will look like during a recession?
Will management try to use that as an excuse to low ball our pay rates while they still boast how we are “recession proof”? Or will they recognize that they need pilots here and try to keep wages and benefits competitive. |
Originally Posted by Trylabyte
(Post 3418992)
Imagine this guy outta nowhere knowing everything and wanting to work did a company that hangs up a sign made of crayon. Just how useless are you in real life?
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3418986)
B6 is done. They can keep trying but he board clearly spoke. And if they somehow accomplish a hostile bid the government will squash it. F9 is our dancing partner, And I’m very thankful for that. Negotiations will be a fight but they always are. Being the Nations 5th largest airline and attrition being what it is, we can, and should score nothing less than a great contract.
Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by nkbux
(Post 3418999)
Whatever you say brother.. can't wait to face an interrogation from the chief pilots office because we block out late...and than again the next week for calling in sick...be careful what you wish for...it's out of our hands at this point and and I want what's best for the guys that fly the yellow planes. But I'm certainly not "thankful" that our "dance" is chaperoned by Bill Franke
Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk Exactly! Filler… |
I don’t call out sick unless I’m sick. So not worried about that. Know what I’m worried about ? After gate divestitures, and SLI, getting absolutely slaughtered seniority wise. Highly unlikely my QOL would even be in the same stratosphere as it is now with a B6 hookup. I think, as many do , the F9 marriage will be much more seamless and more advantageous long term. I’d suggest You be careful what you wish for. Getting absorbed by B6 could be a huge mess. I’d rather grow organically but I’m thrilled that F9 Is the choice of the 2. And if the merger is such a bad idea then why does B6 wanna kill it so bad.
|
Over 400 spirit pilots went on strike during the deepest recession since the 30s for a contract against indigo. Hopefully the combined pilot group will have the balls to do the same if necessary.
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3419027)
I don’t call out sick unless I’m sick. So not worried about that. Know what I’m worried about ? After gate divestitures, and SLI, getting absolutely slaughtered seniority wise. Highly unlikely my QOL would even be in the same stratosphere as it is now with a B6 hookup. I think, as many do , the F9 marriage will be much more seamless and more advantageous long term. I’d suggest You be careful what you wish for. Getting absorbed by B6 could be a huge mess. I’d rather grow organically but I’m thrilled that F9 Is the choice of the 2. And if the merger is such a bad idea then why does B6 wanna kill it so bad.
Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3419027)
I don’t call out sick unless I’m sick. So not worried about that. Know what I’m worried about ? After gate divestitures, and SLI, getting absolutely slaughtered seniority wise. Highly unlikely my QOL would even be in the same stratosphere as it is now with a B6 hookup. I think, as many do , the F9 marriage will be much more seamless and more advantageous long term. I’d suggest You be careful what you wish for. Getting absorbed by B6 could be a huge mess. I’d rather grow organically but I’m thrilled that F9 Is the choice of the 2. And if the merger is such a bad idea then why does B6 wanna kill it so bad.
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by nkbux
(Post 3419043)
So ALPA merger language only applies to F9 not B6...got it...if I were a better I'd guess you weren't here in 2010...God help us all
Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk now throw in divestitures and route overlap mainly on the east coast the DOJ would surely axe and then what happens to relative seniority ? F9 doesn’t have a ton of folks on the east coast and with the addition of PHX, TPA I can’t see a ton of folks from either airline chomping at the bit to run to each other’s bases, keeping many peoples seat, seniority, relatively intact. and In addition to the bloodbath a B6 digestion could be, I’ll firmly stand by my belief that the smart business move for long term growth potential is with an F9 marriage. Im happy the Board voted 9-0 against. |
Originally Posted by nkbux
(Post 3418985)
I wouldn't jump to conclusions on f9 just yet...something tells me B6 isn't done playing hardball...either way I think attrition and demand will still be "strong". It will however be a great tool for whoever is managing whatever airline to drag feet and pretend there's no problems
Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 3419046)
B6 doesn't want to kill our merger, B6 wants our planes and pilots to try and be a competitive airline in America. It has more to do with them succeeding and less to do with f9/nk failing
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk Not sure why more people can’t see this. |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3419058)
ha great argument. The shear size and level seniority B6 has at MCO and FLL would not bode well for us. I’m 35% in base. Merger policy would no doubt TRY and be fair but there is zero chance many of us would keep the same QOL. The plug at JetBlue in FLL is what 11 years on property or so? 9 years here and top 35%. MCO is similarly senior for them.
now throw in divestitures and route overlap mainly on the east coast the DOJ would surely axe and then what happens to relative seniority ? F9 doesn’t have a ton of folks on the east coast and with the addition of PHX, TPA I can’t see a ton of folks from either airline chomping at the bit to run to each other’s bases, keeping many peoples seat, seniority, relatively intact. and In addition to the bloodbath a B6 digestion could be, I’ll firmly stand by my belief that the smart business move for long term growth potential is with an F9 marriage. Im happy the Board voted 9-0 against. |
[QUOTE=dualinput;3419147]Complete speculation. Nothing more[/QU
Where it’ll remain speculative because it ain’t happening. Thankfully! |
[QUOTE=FlyGuy2002;3419151]
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3419147)
Complete speculation. Nothing more[/QU
Where it’ll remain speculative because it ain’t happening. Thankfully! |
[QUOTE=dualinput;3419157]
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3419151)
This isn’t over. My employee opinion withheld, as a share holder I want my $33. I’m sure many others feel the same nah . It’s over. And I dont want my $33. Ill make way more in 10 years with twice the shares of ULCC and keep in mind many investors will lose out at $33.. |
Ted said on the earnings call that even if they went with JB, it would likely be at least two years before anyone even got their $33/share
|
Originally Posted by turbojet28
(Post 3419167)
Ted said on the earnings call that even if they went with JB, it would likely be at least two years before anyone even got their $33/share
|
[QUOTE=FlyGuy2002;3419165]
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3419157)
isn’t over? Now that’s some good speculation right there . nah . It’s over. And I dont want my $33. Ill make way more in 10 years with twice the shares of ULCC and keep in mind many investors will lose out at $33.. |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3418977)
With all indicators pointing to a impending recession, does anybody want to guess what contract negotiations with the new Spirit and Frontier pilot group will look like during a recession?
Will management try to use that as an excuse to low ball our pay rates while they still boast how we are “recession proof”? Or will they recognize that they need pilots here and try to keep wages and benefits competitive. expect to continue to be the lowest paid a320 operator. Truly see Allegiant surpassing f9/nk jcba pay rates. Mark this post. |
Originally Posted by DrDHD
(Post 3419210)
Mark this post.
This post have been successfully marked! but yeah even those new start up's are paying more than NK! Kinda sad for us. |
Walked out on Franke once before. Will gladly do it again if needed.
|
Originally Posted by IWalkJun12
(Post 3419257)
Walked out on Franke once before. Will gladly do it again if needed.
Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk |
[QUOTE=FlyGuy2002;3419165]
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3419157)
isn’t over? Now that’s some good speculation right there . nah . It’s over. And I dont want my $33. Ill make way more in 10 years with twice the shares of ULCC and keep in mind many investors will lose out at $33.. |
Originally Posted by IWalkJun12
(Post 3419257)
Walked out on Franke once before. Will gladly do it again if needed.
|
Originally Posted by IWalkJun12
(Post 3419257)
Walked out on Franke once before. Will gladly do it again if needed.
|
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3419222)
This post have been successfully marked!
but yeah even those new start up's are paying more than NK! Kinda sad for us. |
Originally Posted by HanYolo
(Post 3419362)
Which start up is making more than NK?
……. |
Originally Posted by HanYolo
(Post 3419362)
Which start up is making more than NK?
|
Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
(Post 3419394)
Avelo. First year only, but we all know it's about the drama.
Oh but wait we're totally gonna upgrade 24 a month, or 48, or whatever other made up number. We're literally upgrading 10 a month because of attrition and our CEO has the audacity to say there's no shortage and no issue with our pay/CBA. The cognitive dissonance is palpable. Sorry Ted, time to go. |
Originally Posted by HanYolo
(Post 3419362)
Which start up is making more than NK?
|
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 3419399)
We're literally upgrading 10 a month because of attrition and our CEO has the audacity to say there's no shortage and no issue with our pay/CBA.
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3419058)
ha great argument. The shear size and level seniority B6 has at MCO and FLL would not bode well for us. I’m 35% in base. Merger policy would no doubt TRY and be fair but there is zero chance many of us would keep the same QOL. The plug at JetBlue in FLL is what 11 years on property or so? 9 years here and top 35%. MCO is similarly senior for them.
now throw in divestitures and route overlap mainly on the east coast the DOJ would surely axe and then what happens to relative seniority ? F9 doesn’t have a ton of folks on the east coast and with the addition of PHX, TPA I can’t see a ton of folks from either airline chomping at the bit to run to each other’s bases, keeping many peoples seat, seniority, relatively intact. and In addition to the bloodbath a B6 digestion could be, I’ll firmly stand by my belief that the smart business move for long term growth potential is with an F9 marriage. Im happy the Board voted 9-0 against. In regard to route overlap, why is it always assumed that the flying would be reduced? If the separate airlines are selling the seats before merger seems the combined airline would be able to sell the same number combined, maybe more. |
Originally Posted by DEM1933
(Post 3420010)
In regard to route overlap, why is it always assumed that the flying would be reduced?
If the separate airlines are selling the seats before merger seems the combined airline would be able to sell the same number combined, maybe more. |
Reviving this thread speculating a possible recession in the near future. With the big 3 locking in their contracts for the next 4 years the pilot group is insured barring a furlough. American is buckling down and paying off their debts. United is expanding rapidly and Delta is the usual with their balanced approach.
What will happen to our JCBA if recession hits? B6 will feel the hurt if there is a drop in demand and cash flow during the integration. B6 has already spent a significant portion of their assets and taken in liabilities in acquiring NK. Future proofing is next to impossible since no one has a crystal ball, however one can weigh the risk of staying with NK/B6 and staying for the merger or jumping ship to a big 3 who have locked in their contracts. Thanks for your input. |
Originally Posted by dualratedchoppa
(Post 3682589)
Reviving this thread speculating a possible recession in the near future. With the big 3 locking in their contracts for the next 4 years the pilot group is insured barring a furlough. American is buckling down and paying off their debts. United is expanding rapidly and Delta is the usual with their balanced approach.
What will happen to our JCBA if recession hits? B6 will feel the hurt if there is a drop in demand and cash flow during the integration. B6 has already spent a significant portion of their assets and taken in liabilities in acquiring NK. Future proofing is next to impossible since no one has a crystal ball, however one can weigh the risk of staying with NK/B6 and staying for the merger or jumping ship to a big 3 who have locked in their contracts. Thanks for your input. 2) If you think the "Big 3 locking in their contracts" means anything in a recession, you haven't been paying attention or were around in the years 2000-2012. Sorry but history has shown over and over that whoever is on top today, is the first to be sent to the bottom tomorrow, there is no "future proofing". Welcome to the airlines, it isnt all what some have seen the last 5 years, there is an ugly side to it. Not trying to be nasty to you, but there are way too many pilots who think the last 5 years is the "norm" and are not ready to see what the airlines really are outside of this swan even we have seen the last 5 years. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3682630)
1) Why is there a recession coming? Hasn't that been the chicken little call the last few years?
2) If you think the "Big 3 locking in their contracts" means anything in a recession, you haven't been paying attention or were around in the years 2000-2012. Sorry but history has shown over and over that whoever is on top today, is the first to be sent to the bottom tomorrow, there is no "future proofing". Welcome to the airlines, it isnt all what some have seen the last 5 years, there is an ugly side to it. Not trying to be nasty to you, but there are way too many pilots who think the last 5 years is the "norm" and are not ready to see what the airlines really are outside of this swan even we have seen the last 5 years. Ain’t that the truth. Even companies who were top dog for decades sometimes just disappear. https://i.ibb.co/bW0F7St/IMG-6360.jpg |
Originally Posted by dualratedchoppa
(Post 3682589)
Reviving this thread speculating a possible recession in the near future. With the big 3 locking in their contracts for the next 4 years the pilot group is insured barring a furlough. American is buckling down and paying off their debts. United is expanding rapidly and Delta is the usual with their balanced approach.
What will happen to our JCBA if recession hits? B6 will feel the hurt if there is a drop in demand and cash flow during the integration. B6 has already spent a significant portion of their assets and taken in liabilities in acquiring NK. Future proofing is next to impossible since no one has a crystal ball, however one can weigh the risk of staying with NK/B6 and staying for the merger or jumping ship to a big 3 who have locked in their contracts. Thanks for your input. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands