JetBlue purchase of Spirt
With the news of JB agreeing to buy Spirit , how will that play out with working at spirit as a “new” junior pilot for anyone coming on board in the near future ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Captjack009
(Post 3468385)
With the news of JB agreeing to buy Spirit , how will that play out with working at spirit as a “new” junior pilot for anyone coming on board in the near future ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk today would likely be the “snapshot” date. likely any new hire at either company after today will be integrated with DOH at the bottom of the combined list. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3468390)
today would likely be the “snapshot” date.
likely any new hire at either company after today will be integrated with DOH at the bottom of the combined list. |
Originally Posted by Proflight
(Post 3468412)
I understand seniority will be future DOH for the new hire, but any disadvantages for a new hire starting soon? Wonder if it's still a smart move to jump a ship from a regional.
|
Is this contingent on a shareholder vote? I’m assuming it is like the Frontier deal….if so when is the date?
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3468414)
It's proportionally all the same. You were joining one company at the bottom. You are now joining a future bigger company at the bottom, but both companies are hiring aggressively in parallel, and your date of hire will put you above all new hires from BOTH companies that are hired after you. No real change, other than you will eventually have a bigger stronger airline with more bases and a better future contract.
|
Originally Posted by Bocaflyer
(Post 3468425)
What he said! At the bottom there is no real difference in overall company percentile like we will see at the top and middle. There's no harm at all joining now at Spirit or jetBlue for that matter.
|
Originally Posted by nuball5
(Post 3468421)
Is this contingent on a shareholder vote? I’m assuming it is like the Frontier deal….if so when is the date?
|
Originally Posted by nuball5
(Post 3468421)
Is this contingent on a shareholder vote? I’m assuming it is like the Frontier deal….if so when is the date?
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3468573)
Yes, although that’s likely a done deal. DIJ approval is another issue but I doubt this is something DOJ really wants to get in a political fight about. JB is reasonably well connected politically. I imagine a few token concessions will be required.
|
Originally Posted by Cockpit997
(Post 3468580)
The DOJ doesn’t really have a leg to stand on as they created the big 3. Who are they to deny a smaller carrier getting larger to compete with what they made.
|
JetGREEN new motto, ‘“You are worth half a mint.”
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3468573)
Yes, although that’s likely a done deal. DIJ approval is another issue but I doubt this is something DOJ really wants to get in a political fight about. JB is reasonably well connected politically. I imagine a few token concessions will be required.
https://stocks.apple.com/AylJJfaDAQY-gLWgHRaUvOw |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3469259)
Spirit Airlines gets double downgrade to underweight after JetBlue deal announced
https://stocks.apple.com/AylJJfaDAQY-gLWgHRaUvOw |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3469263)
They got downgraded to underweight because we lost Barry Biffle yesterday. But don’t worry, we will be overweight again as soon as Robin is the CEO of the new company.
|
Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
(Post 3468606)
EXACTLY. Or like when they say "oh prices will go up!" Okay so the big 4 just get to have a monopoly on air travel forever then? It makes no sense.
I mean, the pricing difference between JB and a flight on a legacy is negligible. Heck sometimes when I want to buy a ticket between cities, DL is less than JB on the same date within an hour of each other. Then there's Spirit. Flies the same aircraft as JB and DL on the same route, just later at night. A fraction of the price. Eliminating the Spirit option is certainly a loss for the customer on a budget. In which the regulators may have beef with. I dunno though. I'm just a pilot. Honestly just speculating on this stuff. |
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 3470004)
I mean, the pricing difference between JB and a flight on a legacy is negligible. Heck sometimes when I want to buy a ticket between cities, DL is less than JB on the same date within an hour of each other. Then there's Spirit. Flies the same aircraft as JB and DL on the same route, just later at night. A fraction of the price.
Eliminating the Spirit option is certainly a loss for the customer on a budget. In which the regulators may have beef with. I dunno though. I'm just a pilot. Honestly just speculating on this stuff. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3468390)
today would likely be the “snapshot” date.
likely any new hire at either company after today will be integrated with DOH at the bottom of the combined list. Also remember that all that matters are 3 things with ALPA. Status and Category Widebody - 777/787 Narrowbody - 737 Airbus 319-321 Small Narrowbody E-190, A220, etc Longevity Career Expectations (this only applies to fences to protect widebody flying). It is to prevent an airline with a bunch of WB from acquiring a small airline, and then those pilots immediately being able to fly the WB planes they would have not had an expectation to fly. The “payrate” integration argument has never worked. Even CAL argued their 767-400 should be integrated as a 747 because of the payrates, but it was rejected per the policy. Payrates are not mentioned in policy anywhere. This merger should be pretty straightforward since the fleets are relatively the same except the small narrowbody planes at B6. Everyone should be within a couple percent depending on longevity. |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3470009)
ALPA merger policy is “Merger Announcement Date”. Its not relevant when it closes or is approved. All that matters is when the merger is announced. Anyone at either airline will be placed below all the pilots at the other airline.
Also remember that all that matters are 3 things with ALPA. Status and Category Widebody - 777/787 Narrowbody - 737 Airbus 319-321 Small Narrowbody E-190, A220, etc Longevity Career Expectations (this only applies to fences to protect widebody flying). It is to prevent an airline with a bunch of WB from acquiring a small airline, and then those pilots immediately being able to fly the WB planes they would have not had an expectation to fly. The “payrate” integration argument has never worked. Even CAL argued their 767-400 should be integrated as a 747 because of the payrates, but it was rejected per the policy. Payrates are not mentioned in policy anywhere. This merger should be pretty straightforward since the fleets are relatively the same except the small narrowbody planes at B6. Everyone should be within a couple percent depending on longevity. this is gonna be fun |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3470026)
small narrowbody?
this is gonna be fun |
Originally Posted by BunkerF16
(Post 3470027)
Lol...right? Already in the corners piS$ing trying to mark territories. 190s will be gone by the time we merge and the 220 will not be discounted, but I guess if I was on the NK MnA committee, I'd try that line of thinking too.
I wish we could just skip ahead to the arbitrator ruling now. |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3470030)
I would too, and expect the SPA MEC to fight as hard as possible. Maybe our MEC will seek to fence off our heavy narrowbody flying!
I wish we could just skip ahead to the arbitrator ruling now. Looking forward to the Spirit bubbas coming on board. Oh, and no fences. Daddy needs to drive to work in DTW! 😂 |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3470026)
small narrowbody?
this is gonna be fun |
Originally Posted by BunkerF16
(Post 3470031)
100% agree. And I'm not mad at any NK who tries to make an argument that helps their position. It's not personal, it's business. I may disagree with their point of view but I'd probably have the same one if I was them. Bottom line is there's a handful of pilots on both sides with that committee that have any influence. Ultimately it will be determined by an arbiter no doubt. My hope is we can move on from that and galvanize to come together and get a top shelf JCBA because that's where we'll all make our $ and QOL.
Looking forward to the Spirit bubbas coming on board. Oh, and no fences. Daddy needs to drive to work in DTW! 😂 |
Originally Posted by BunkerF16
(Post 3470031)
100% agree. And I'm not mad at any NK who tries to make an argument that helps their position. It's not personal, it's business. I may disagree with their point of view but I'd probably have the same one if I was them. Bottom line is there's a handful of pilots on both sides with that committee that have any influence. Ultimately it will be determined by an arbiter no doubt. My hope is we can move on from that and galvanize to come together and get a top shelf JCBA because that's where we'll all make our $ and QOL.
Looking forward to the Spirit bubbas coming on board. Oh, and no fences. Daddy needs to drive to work in DTW! 😂 |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3470037)
You can have DTW 🤣👍
|
Originally Posted by BunkerF16
(Post 3470039)
Don't tease me. No fences, no bumps and no flushes and we good. Deal?
|
Originally Posted by fumeevented
(Post 3470041)
airline merger newb here. what's the purpose of a fence? If there is a vacancy and you can hold it then why wouldn't you get it?
|
Originally Posted by fumeevented
(Post 3470041)
airline merger newb here. what's the purpose of a fence? If there is a vacancy and you can hold it then why wouldn't you get it?
|
Originally Posted by Bgood
(Post 3470046)
it's to temporarily prevent someone from bidding into another position brought on by the other company due to career expectations, usually used for WB type flying. These guys are just messing around.
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3470030)
I would too, and expect the SPA MEC to fight as hard as possible. Maybe our MEC will seek to fence off our heavy narrowbody flying!
I wish we could just skip ahead to the arbitrator ruling now. |
Originally Posted by BunkerF16
(Post 3470049)
Who's messing around? I hope there are no fences but you can be territorial with bases just as you can with categories of aircraft. I sincerely hope there are no fences and people's position are protected with a no bump/flush policy. Would be the best outcome.
|
Originally Posted by Bgood
(Post 3470056)
Yeah I know there can be but I'm just saying what it's usually used for. I'm not expecting there will be any fences. Like what the hell would we (B6) or NK would need to fence off?
|
Originally Posted by BunkerF16
(Post 3470049)
Who's messing around? I hope there are no fences but you can be territorial with bases just as you can with categories of aircraft. I sincerely hope there are no fences and people's position are protected with a no bump/flush policy. Would be the best outcome.
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3470051)
😂, same. I am 20% and not looking forward to moving down, but I know you didn't pick this either.
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3470086)
I was hired Spring of 2011 and am 40% 😭 We'll probably be slotted next to each other on the final list 🍻
|
Originally Posted by BunkerF16
(Post 3470031)
100% agree. And I'm not mad at any NK who tries to make an argument that helps their position. It's not personal, it's business. I may disagree with their point of view but I'd probably have the same one if I was them. Bottom line is there's a handful of pilots on both sides with that committee that have any influence. Ultimately it will be determined by an arbiter no doubt. My hope is we can move on from that and galvanize to come together and get a top shelf JCBA because that's where we'll all make our $ and QOL.
Looking forward to the Spirit bubbas coming on board. Oh, and no fences. Daddy needs to drive to work in DTW! 😂 |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3470033)
What do you expect? If we bring up relative seniority over DOH you get mad. Alpa arbitration does not take future orders/reductions, relative seniority, or pay rates into account (based on AA/VA merger). Merger is now on, and you do have 60 SNB on property. Face it, you and I both just want what is best for #1. Until we are merged I support my MEC in fighting for me, and I expect the same of you. As far as the JCBA goes, we are the same group fighting management.
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3470120)
The first 6 (or so) of those 60 are already parked and the rest are being parked over the next two years. Those aircraft are dead men walking and won't even be considered in an SLI.
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3470120)
The first 6 (or so) of those 60 are already parked and the rest are being parked over the next two years. Those aircraft are dead men walking and won't even be considered in an SLI.
|
Originally Posted by nkbux
(Post 3470118)
glad to have you brother! I’m biased but it’s an awesome base… provided your junior to me 😁
And we have 100 220s on order so far. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:43 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands