![]() |
Maybe it was the VP or the network guy, I thought it was two new bases this year. Maybe when the next TH comes up they will take that question, or not. Was it the VP in a TH who said PHL was going to be announced, and then covid happened?
With AB saying they can't deliver on time and getting criticized by the leasing companies for late deliveries, see what network planning comes up with now that all 33 planned new deliveries for this year likely won't happen. |
Originally Posted by skytrekker
(Post 3574136)
What airline wants to deal with the headache that is CA. by opening an LAX base?
https://news.justia.com/california-f...aska-airlines/ |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3574139)
Um, nearly every US airline. And JB already has an LAX base, so the combined airline will have one anyway.
|
Originally Posted by skytrekker
(Post 3574147)
Correct, but those are existing, some for decades. We are talking about a ULCC with no current footprint in CA. Just let JB deal with it post-merger and continue to expand LAS?
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3574149)
I can’t imagine any new base will be done without Robin giving his blessing over it. So a LAX base seems like a likely base
|
Originally Posted by skytrekker
(Post 3574164)
I'm all for more bases out west, RNO, SLC, SEA, PHX, etc. From an economic value, is growing LAS not the ULCC path and avoiding the high costs that direct employees bring by opening a base, beyond the contract employees?
|
Originally Posted by skytrekker
(Post 3574164)
I'm all for more bases out west, RNO, SLC, SEA, PHX, etc. From an economic value, is growing LAS not the ULCC path and avoiding the high costs that direct employees bring by opening a base, beyond the contract employees?
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3574225)
At a quarter million people, RNO isn’t exactly huge. SLC might make sense with their new terminal but they aren’t a huge population service area either (~225k) . SEA is big enough but AK and DL are kind of monopolizing the terminal space. PDX (service area population ~2 million) has recently expanded their gates, PHX has a service area of ~4million (and growing) so certainly a possibility.
Indeed, realistically I imagine the only possible new base west of Denver itself, is LAX. DEN, LAS, and LAX could cover all west of the Rockies. |
Originally Posted by skytrekker
(Post 3574233)
Indeed, realistically I imagine the only possible new base west of Denver itself, is LAX. DEN, LAS, and LAX could cover all west of the Rockies.
|
Originally Posted by skytrekker
(Post 3574233)
Indeed, realistically I imagine the only possible new base west of Denver itself, is LAX. DEN, LAS, and LAX could cover all west of the Rockies.
PHX would have substantial Mexico/Central or South America traffic. Could you cover it out of LAX or LAS? Sure, but it might be more cost effective to have a base there. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:01 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands