![]() |
Originally Posted by bonvoyage
(Post 3757423)
Legacy ticket price isn’t too much higher than the LCC’s. Sure what route and timing do factor in to pricing. But on average when you have to pay for a checked bag and buy onboard items, the pricing comes out near what it would have to be all inclusive on a legacy.
|
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3757348)
I have been a firm believer in the ulcc business model and I continue to be. The most surprising thing to me lately has been the financial success of the legacies the last 2 years. They just keep raking it in. But it can't last forever and when travel demand and people willing to pay $750 fur a round trip domestic ticket wane, they will be stuck with their super high cost structure. Also, for the younger, newer crowd; don't ever forget that this is a brutally hard industry. The history of airline bankrupbankruptcies, furloughs, pay cuts, etc is a long and rich one. Edit: I thought this thread was in the Frontier subsection. My bad. I thought I was writing to the Frontier pilot group. Sorry if this sounded weird The biggest issue with Spirit, according to their SEC filings, is the lack of demand. Q2: "However, demand for the peak summer travel period has been softer than expected, resulting in lower fare levels on the routes we serve. This summer we are comparing to a period of exceptionally strong domestic and near-field international demand in 2022, while at the same time seeing demand shift away from these regions towards long-haul international. Difficult weather and challenging Air Traffic Control initiatives are also creating a significant headwind to unit revenue. These trends continued throughout July and we are assuming they will continue into the fall. However, once the international summer travel season ends and kids go back to school, we anticipate that demand will shift back towards domestic. This should mean a more normal pricing and demand environment for the peak holiday travel periods in the fourth quarter." Q3: “Softer demand for our product and discounted fares in our markets led to a disappointing outcome for the third quarter 2023. We continue to see discounted fares for travel booked through the pre-Thanksgiving period. And, unfortunately, we have not seen the anticipated return to a normal demand and pricing environment for the peak holiday periods. Given these continued trends, we are evaluating our growth profile and our competitive position. We have already taken the first steps by modifying the cadence of our aircraft deliveries through the end of the decade and slowing our capacity growth in the near term. We continue to believe merging with JetBlue and creating a viable competitor to the Big Four US airlines is in the best interest of consumers, Team Members, and shareholders. We are prepared to make the necessary strategic shifts to enable Spirit to compete effectively in this new demand backdrop,” |
Originally Posted by bonvoyage
(Post 3757423)
Legacy ticket price isn’t too much higher than the LCC’s. Sure what route and timing do factor in to pricing. But on average when you have to pay for a checked bag and buy onboard items, the pricing comes out near what it would have to be all inclusive on a legacy.
To me the bigger problem is the psychology of the American ULCC experience right now. It feels like a gotcha on many of the fees. Instead it should start from the moment you purchase a ticket to feel like a game on how much you can save while still spending the money. “Want a seat?” ”No.” ”BAM you just SAVED $25 each way! If you change your mind later no problem but for now that seat is FREE!….Check that bag instead of carrying it on and SAVE another $5!” Flying for cheap should feel like winning a contest. |
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 3757483)
I think your point is part of the problem. People are trying to make it like a legacy traveling experience. It’s not and it’s not intended to be. I don’t care about the bag of pretzels and a coke. I don’t care about the inflight entertainment. I don’t care about the wifi. I don’t care about the seat back charging. I usually don’t care what seat I get. I can read and measure a bag size limit. So for me a ULCC pricing structure is much more preferred.
To me the bigger problem is the psychology of the American ULCC experience right now. It feels like a gotcha on many of the fees. Instead it should start from the moment you purchase a ticket to feel like a game on how much you can save while still spending the money. “Want a seat?” ”No.” ”BAM you just SAVED $25 each way! If you change your mind later no problem but for now that seat is FREE!….Check that bag instead of carrying it on and SAVE another $5!” Flying for cheap should feel like winning a contest. |
Originally Posted by bluespoon
(Post 3757517)
At the end of the day ULCC is a business model that’s based on filling as many seats as possible. Without fees, it has to be full. Why pay spirit fees when you can go to the big 4 for similar prices. In order to survive, they’re going to have to restructure their costs and they might have to rebrand. The spirit name is synonymous with passenger brawls and a cheap greyhound experience.
|
Originally Posted by bluespoon
(Post 3757517)
At the end of the day ULCC is a business model that’s based on filling as many seats as possible. Without fees, it has to be full. Why pay spirit fees when you can go to the big 4 for similar prices. In order to survive, they’re going to have to restructure their costs and they might have to rebrand. The spirit name is synonymous with passenger brawls and a cheap greyhound experience.
They also have to have high utilization per day. Having an asset in revenue service for 18 hours a day is 50% more than having one in service for 12 hours a day. Few years ago Spirit “bought” their D0 numbers by lowering utilization and not driving turn and burn so hard. Before that they were maxing fleet utilization by selling unrealistic schedules and just taking the tardy’s. It is sort of unproven if Spirt can maintain a respectable D0, and have the utilization to maintain a profit. The tacked on legs that Southwest has and that forces mostly AM or PM trips is what helps their utilization and profitability so much. The big 3 can add a hub bank, or delete one and stretch the sits to cover the larger footprints of an available “travel day” and help poach the early/late travelers that are suppose to be utilization gravy profit. |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3757348)
S
I don't think Spirit is going out of business though. They have a lot of cash on hand right now. |
Originally Posted by StoneQOLdCrazy
(Post 3757645)
They do? then why the aircraft sale/leaseback announcement the other day?
|
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3757649)
I believe they have roughly 1 B in cash on hand
I dont think we are getting away from the alacarte, ancilliary rev model. We may offer different bundles and add more BFS in order to offere diffrent bundles. We have a strong presence in Florida and Vegas, which are two attractive markets and have grown a nationwide base structure to support it. I can see a doubling down on ultra low fares, ultra basic economy to vactation desitinations while also offereing compelling bundles, like a no-worries ticket - gets a big seat and checked bag or two carry ons, a tiered system like all the other airlines have..Wanna-get-away etc, etc. I have no idea how they spin this PR-wise but it will require some advertising dollars and I am hoping the can leverage the current news buzz or the next large stock change to also capture positive PR, but I think that will help compete just as much as low fares will. A positive image helps more than people imagine. |
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 3757483)
Flying for cheap should feel like winning a contest. Top 10 submissions get a free bag check on a future Spirit flight!* *void if you were added to the federal no-fly or banned from the airport list as a result of the brawl. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:05 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands