Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Winglets

Old 04-04-2008 | 02:34 PM
  #1  
mmaviator's Avatar
Thread Starter
pants on the ground
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
From: back seat
Default Winglets

Just Wondering If Military Jets Have Winglets. Also, Could Fighters Use Winglets And Would It Be Feasible? Whether Or Not Fuel Is A Problem In The Military?
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 03:34 PM
  #2  
CessnaCitationX's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: my desk, studying
Default

C-17 http://www.airliners.net/photo/USA--...ter/1254896/M/

Their's are 9 feet tall.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 04:02 PM
  #3  
dannolars's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: C-17 bunk/in the kiddie pool
Default

Yup, CCX beat me to the punch, 9' winglets on the C-17.

Fuel is definitely a problem in the military. I have seen a 180 in regards to fuel planning for a typical mission. They are much more concerned (as they should be) at saving fuel. Before prices went high, you could pretty much get away with anything, with only the weakest of excuses. Lately they have been holding our feet to the fire more and more on landing with excess gas.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 05:31 PM
  #4  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default Whitcomb Winglets & Fighters

Mmaviator:

They could be used---but there is no reason to.

Winglets are used on civil jets because they give part of the benefit of a longer wingspan and therefore higher aspect-ratio. Think "High-aspect" like a high performance sailplane. Longer wings mean less energy loss to wingtip vortices.

However, long wings mean a longer lever trying to break the wing off at the wingroot. That means you have to build your wing stronger--and therefore, heavier.

Winglets give some of the increase in apparent "span," but with less bending-moment.

Fighters:

Since the wings of fighters are generally built for strength anyway (most modern fighters allow up to 9 g, which means they are built to a 13-g ultimate strength), the small gain in efficiency in level-flight is offset by the increase in weight. Weight is a performance-killer in a dog-fight.

Plus, the drag of external weapons, whether they are missiles, bombs, or self-defense jammers, is a far greater variable than the meager savings by using winglets.

Winglets would also make a bigger radar signature, which means easier detection by the enemy.

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 04-05-2008 at 01:50 PM.
Reply
Old 04-05-2008 | 03:07 PM
  #5  
blastoff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by dannolars
Yup, CCX beat me to the punch, 9' winglets on the C-17.

Fuel is definitely a problem in the military. I have seen a 180 in regards to fuel planning for a typical mission. They are much more concerned (as they should be) at saving fuel. Before prices went high, you could pretty much get away with anything, with only the weakest of excuses. Lately they have been holding our feet to the fire more and more on landing with excess gas.
"Birds Fly for Free, AMC Doesn't"
Reply
Old 04-05-2008 | 07:08 PM
  #6  
dannolars's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: C-17 bunk/in the kiddie pool
Default

Originally Posted by blastoff
"Birds Fly for Free, AMC Doesn't"
I actually had that tatooed on my a**.

Last edited by dannolars; 04-05-2008 at 07:09 PM. Reason: words
Reply
Old 04-07-2008 | 08:36 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
From: Pilot
Default

Speaking of winglets, how tall are the winglets on the 737 and 757? Just curious because they are pretty big.
Reply
Old 04-08-2008 | 12:08 PM
  #8  
SmoothOnTop's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

from the flight deck of the 1900, everything looks big..

In heavy summer rainstorms, I tuck the beech under the tails of the big tin ahead on the taxiways so that I can open the storm window without getting drenched.






Just kidding...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ve764
Major
37
01-15-2008 11:16 AM
RockBottom
Major
1
09-18-2005 02:19 PM
4th Level
Major
1
03-13-2005 05:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices