Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Power question on B737 and others >

Power question on B737 and others

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Power question on B737 and others

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2008, 08:38 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 735
Default Power question on B737 and others

Greetings all...

Right behind my head on the 737NG is a pair of electrical outlets. One is 115VAC at 400Hz. There is also one in the galley that our FAs use to charge the credit card processing machine they keep on the cart.

Does anyone know the specs and/or where to get something that will "step down" the 400Hz to 50/60Hz?

I checked at my local radio shack and found no help there.

Thanks!
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 08-26-2008, 08:56 PM
  #2  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Frequency vs. Voltage

Matt:

You can't "step down" frequency--only voltage.

If you want to run a device from this socket, most items would probably be ok.

For example, if you want to plug in your cell-phone charger: the charger does step-down the voltage to something between 3 and 12 volts, depending on model. There will be diodes in the charger to change the AC to DC, and a filter--composed of capacitors, resistors, and sometimes coils, to smooth-out the peaks and valleys of the former AC current.

This capacitor-resistor-coil circuit is optimized for 60 HZ. However, the slightly "wavey" DC that would result from such a power supply with 400HZ should be OK for most phones and/or laptops, as the phone or laptop has additional Cap-res-coil circuits, and the charging of batteries doesn't really depend upon a stable frequency.

Of note: AC motors don't work with incorrect frequencies. Electric razors, and vacuum cleaners, margarita blenders (probably aren't taking these on your trips) should NOT be used with 400 HZ current!

Bottom line for common electronics: plug it in. If it works fine, use it. If it acts strange, then don't--but it shouldn't damage it.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 08-26-2008, 09:13 PM
  #3  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

T38 is correct. I have never had a problem with non-motorized devices such as cell phone and laptop power supplies, but the potential exists. I have heard anecdotes of FAs burning out their chargers, but they use the outlet far more often then pilots on the CRJ because it's in the galley, not the cockpit.

Those vacuum cleaners that the cleaning people use do have 400hz motors. A 60hz motor would probably work...seven times too fast, for a brief period of time

You could step the frequency down using motor-generator arrangement, but that would be ridiculously complicated for the application.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-26-2008, 09:28 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 735
Default

Thanks for the replies, guys. I'll try a test the next time I am out.
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 08-27-2008, 06:18 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 804
Post

It would seem like an easy way to convert any form of AC power to any other form of AC power would be to put it through a transformer rectifier to convert AC to DC, and then a static inverter to convert the DC to AC.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 08-27-2008, 07:11 AM
  #6  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Relative Complexity

Joe:

Transformer-Rectifiers can be relatively small, especially if the power (Watts) is small.

Static inverters used to be electro-mechanical. Cumbersome, and prone to failure. New solid-state types are more reliable, but require very heavy-duty components to handle the amperage. That makes them expensive.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 08-27-2008, 06:30 PM
  #7  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Default

Just a quick thought...

Have you ever wondered WHY the power used aboard Boeing airplanes IS at 400hz?

'leave you with it!

Cheers...E...
EWSP is offline  
Old 08-28-2008, 04:58 PM
  #8  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Industry Standard

EWSP:

Well, its not just Boeing...it is aircraft industry standard.

Why 400Hz? That, I am not sure of.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 08-29-2008, 03:38 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 204
Default

EWSP,

Not too sure if the reason still holds today, but one of the reasons for 400 hz systems being used originally was for weight. 400 hz generators weigh less (& are smaller) than 60 hz generators. Unfortunately the 400 hz generators suffer from voltage drops more than the 60 hz brothers (lower frequency reduces loss over long distances).

& now back to other useless trivia!
SGRogue is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices