Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Climb Performance Terps Vs Far25 >

Climb Performance Terps Vs Far25

Search

Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Climb Performance Terps Vs Far25

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2009 | 07:24 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
New Hire
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default Climb Performance Terps Vs Far25

Terps requires 3.3% climb gradient or as published and far 25 requires 2.4% in the 2nd segment and 1.2% in the final segment (2 engine aircraft). Assume a 500/500/500 take off and no published climb gradient. At what altitude should you clean up and accelerate to enroute climb speed MVA/MSA/MEA or a training profile altitude 400/1500 AGL? Assume no airport analysis and AFM shows greater than 3.3% to a safe altitude.

Seems to me that your 2nd segment configuration will give the least horizontal flight path to a safe altitude since far 25 doesn't consider terrain environment.

Thanks for your responses.
Reply
Old 01-21-2009 | 10:57 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Do whatever the captain tell me
Default test

deleted for personal reason
Reply
Old 02-05-2009 | 10:04 PM
  #3  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,196
Likes: 51
From: Legacy FO
Default

You are confusing what TERPS says an aircraft must climb to takeoff and avoid obstacles (if no obstables are listed) and what Part 25 says an aircraft must be able to achieve as designed.
Reply
Old 02-06-2009 | 07:58 AM
  #4  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 697
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
You are confusing what TERPS says an aircraft must climb to takeoff and avoid obstacles (if no obstables are listed) and what Part 25 says an aircraft must be able to achieve as designed.
FAR 25 is for transport category aircraft, so you would THINK those standards would be set with IFR operations in mind...but maybe not.

My guess is that all transport category aircraft can easily exceed that 2.4% climb gradient...it's just a design minimum.
Reply
Old 03-16-2009 | 06:06 AM
  #5  
New Hire
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Former ALPA TERPs rep, presently NBAA RNP rep
Default

Originally Posted by terpster
Terps requires 3.3% climb gradient or as published and far 25 requires 2.4% in the 2nd segment and 1.2% in the final segment (2 engine aircraft). Assume a 500/500/500 take off and no published climb gradient. At what altitude should you clean up and accelerate to enroute climb speed MVA/MSA/MEA or a training profile altitude 400/1500 AGL? Assume no airport analysis and AFM shows greater than 3.3% to a safe altitude.

Seems to me that your 2nd segment configuration will give the least horizontal flight path to a safe altitude since far 25 doesn't consider terrain environment.

Thanks for your responses.
Apples and oranges. TERPs is for normal ops. One engine inoperative (OEI) is covered by FAR 121.189, which in turn, refers to the Part 25 takeoff flight path.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cheyenne Driver
Fractional
29
11-03-2023 07:59 AM
Tanker-driver
Technical
19
10-29-2008 08:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices