Search

Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Twr giving winds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2009 | 09:25 AM
  #11  
Phantom Flyer's Avatar
Snakes & Nape
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
From: B-767 Captain
Thumbs up Right on the Money

Originally Posted by georgetg
MFD displayed winds = Nice to Know

Tower Wind = Legal

Lots of different wind limits/restrictions for most airlines...

and to some degree there's always "How will it sound in court..."

Cheers
George
Absolutely correct George. Good Post.

The tower issued winds are the winds at the surface, i.e., across the runway. They are legally required for take-off and landing in most commercial operations.

Depending on the MFD/FMC system, one may not even get a "wind read out" until airborne and I wouldn't trust it until I had at least a few thousand feet of altitude.

Just my two cents...devalued to $ .001120094 on Friday's close.

G'Day Mates
Reply
Old 04-30-2009 | 11:25 AM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Delta
Default

Originally Posted by CessnaCitationX
Why do towers give the winds to aircraft when they can get wind spd/dir from their MFD?

MFD!? What is this magic you speak of???
Reply
Old 04-30-2009 | 11:45 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: 737 Right
Default

Originally Posted by hawkesaurus
MFD!? What is this magic you speak of???
I always figured it was something they invented to help out us RJ wonder kids. You real pilots don't need 'em!
Reply
Old 04-30-2009 | 12:52 PM
  #14  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by waflyboy
I always figured it was something they invented to help out us RJ wonder kids. You real pilots don't need 'em!
I find that, at least in the pattern, that the smoke/dust blowing off the fields (at least in the central valley of CA) are more accurate than my derived winds in the aircraft. I suppose using the wind sock, the trees and the waving fields of agriculture work well too

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 04-30-2009 | 03:55 PM
  #15  
Pilotpip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

The winds on a 3 mile final might also be very different than the winds at the touchdown zone.
Reply
Old 05-02-2009 | 01:26 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Default

Aren't MFD winds derived from nav data anyway, i.e., the glass performing many E6B type calculation per second? In other words it's based on the GPS/VOR/etc data and air speed, ground speed, etc...Based on the past, not what's on the runway in front of you.
Reply
Old 05-02-2009 | 04:15 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default PFD winds

On our older cockpits (1980s vintage), the winds are averaged over 30 second time blocks, and may not represent what's in front of you. For our older gear, without any predictive capability, it is essentially the wind you just flew through. Tower winds are always legal winds.
Reply
Old 05-07-2009 | 12:51 PM
  #18  
Clue32's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Army
15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 946
Likes: 14
From: 747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by CessnaCitationX
Why do towers give the winds to aircraft when they can get wind spd/dir from their MFD?
All aircraft have wind limitations. The tower can provide the pilot with the most up to the minute wind reading. For my aircraft, which can't take off with any tail wind, it is very important to be able to verify that we have zero tail wind component.

That cleared for take-off call will be reviewed if any metal gets bent and if you exceeded your tail wind or cross wind limitation on take-off then it is only the PC's fault for trying to take that aircraft into the air.
Reply
Old 06-04-2009 | 06:57 AM
  #19  
New Hire
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: G550/450/IV
Default

Fellow aviators,

If the aircraft taking off is military the winds report is required. If there is no ATIS, the winds report is required. If you tell Ground/Tower you "have the numbers", or provide them with the correct ATIS code, and there is no significant change the winds, report is not required.

Personally, I take all information as nice to know and react to what the aircraft is doing during landing/take-off. I have seen many instances of incorrect technique being used because of the anticipated winds!

Hope this helps.

Reply
Old 06-04-2009 | 07:06 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
I find that, at least in the pattern, that the smoke/dust blowing off the fields (at least in the central valley of CA) are more accurate than my derived winds in the aircraft. I suppose using the wind sock, the trees and the waving fields of agriculture work well too

USMCFLYR
None of these things you mention have buttons or batteries and are therefore considered midevil concepts by the children of the magenta line
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mdt301
Leaving the Career
24
03-21-2014 10:07 PM
skiermws
Flight Schools and Training
11
08-26-2011 07:49 PM
Atwoo155
Regional
18
12-05-2008 08:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices