Search

Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Why Not

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2009 | 11:09 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default Why Not

This may be a dumb question but I'm going to ask it anyways. I'm a student pilot, very close to getting my ticket. I've been doing some research on parasitic drag and what the aircraft manufacturers are doing to try to reduce drag and increase fuel efficiency. Adding winglets is a very effective way to reduce this drag, increase fuel efficiency and also adding lift without increasing the size of the wing. As an engine mechanic in the AF I've worked on several types of planes that have been modified over and over to increase their capability and life to an already old airframe. These planes have been flown long past the manufacturers estimated lifespan due to these modifications. Ok, here's my question. Why don't the airlines modify their older aircraft, which still have alot of life, with winglets in an attempt to reduce fuel costs? It seems to me that it would be a simple modification that would have great financial benefits in the long run.
Reply
Old 11-07-2009 | 11:47 AM
  #2  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,167
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

It looks simple, but in typical aviation fashion is very expensive. I think it is around one million (or more) per airplane. You also take the airplane out of service for probably weeks, all while still making lease/mortgage payments and incurring calendar-based Mx expenses.

You might not save enough to recover the investment on older airplanes, which may only have a few years left in service.
Reply
Old 11-07-2009 | 01:25 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

That makes sense. I forgot that in the civilian world every minute a plane is down for mx it's lost revenue for the company. I'm sure that to some extent modifications are done, TCTO's (time compliance techincal orders) or AD's, as long as it doesn't add too much to the mx time frame.

Thank you rickair7777
Reply
Old 11-07-2009 | 01:45 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Default

yeah, it's a combination of time down for maintenance, and return on investment. The airlines don't want to or can't afford to pay for any modification that won't pay for itself within a year or two.
Reply
Old 11-07-2009 | 05:12 PM
  #5  
Twin Wasp's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,741
Likes: 1
From: Sr. VP of button pushing
Default

The winglets also add weight. Japan airlines has 747-400s without the winglets because on their short legs they wouldn't pay off and they'd take a payload hit. I've heard the wing on the -400 is so twisted when the plane is heavy they actually make drag the first couple hours but as the weight drops they pay off.
Reply
Old 11-07-2009 | 05:19 PM
  #6  
ryan1234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: USAF
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp
The winglets also add weight. Japan airlines has 747-400s without the winglets because on their short legs they wouldn't pay off and they'd take a payload hit. I've heard the wing on the -400 is so twisted when the plane is heavy they actually make drag the first couple hours but as the weight drops they pay off.
Exactly... it was my understanding that not all aircraft even benefit from the winglets they were designed with. Just depends I guess.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices