Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Gulfstreams?

Old 08-17-2011 | 03:50 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Watching the professionals do it
Default Gulfstreams?

Hello as a frequent follower of this forum but first time poster I would love it if someone could explain to me how Gulfstream has managed to avoid using any leading edge lift devices through their principal large aircraft line up (excluding the IAI G100/50/G200/50/80). It seems that they still achieve impressive field performance without them while all other business jet manufacturers minus the Hawker 800/900...etc all use them.

Thanks!
Reply
Old 08-17-2011 | 09:35 AM
  #2  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

More wing area, less sweep angle than a GLEX, to begin with. They also are about 5,000 pounds less gross weight for any specific trip. But, they do operate at higher speeds, especially the G450.

GF
Reply
Old 08-17-2011 | 04:00 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: 320 F.O.
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
More wing area, less sweep angle than a GLEX, to begin with. They also are about 5,000 pounds less gross weight for any specific trip. But, they do operate at higher speeds, especially the G450.

GF
Well said. The 5/550 has an amazing wing but it is so big that it actual prohibits it from Santa Monica as well as certain taxiways at various airports.
Reply
Old 08-17-2011 | 05:36 PM
  #4  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

More trivia, as opposed to the Gulfstream's main competitor, the GLEX:

Vmcg (GLEX) is 80 KAS v. 107 KIAS (GLF). Vmcg defines lowest take-off speeds.

Vmca (GLEX) is 86 KIAS v. 112 KAS (GLF). Vmca defines minimum engine-out speeds airborne.

The GLF has about 100 square feet more wing area and weighs, as I said, about 5,000 pounds less for similar missions. Field lengths for a GLEX are abou 500' greater, but sometimes the GLEX needs all that help to fly the same mission.

GF
Reply
Old 08-17-2011 | 07:07 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 398
Likes: 1
Default

Interesting about the vmcg/vmca... those probably aren't bullet points most customers see

For the original poster, the Lear 60 doesn't have any leading edge devices as well.... but it is absolutely covered with every type of boundary layer energizer you can imagine and our ref speeds are pretty high! (128-139 kts)
Reply
Old 08-17-2011 | 10:29 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Watching the professionals do it
Default

Thanks for the quick reply's and yes I did forget about the lear series of aircraft.
Reply
Old 10-07-2011 | 12:44 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

The new G280 wing looks good, as do the performance numbers.
Reply
Old 10-12-2011 | 03:27 PM
  #8  
ce650's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: EVIL PRIVATE JET
Default

Originally Posted by Astra SPx
The new G280 wing looks good, as do the performance numbers.

Got a tour of it at NBAA this week. It looks real good!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AirbusA320
Corporate
120
10-08-2010 03:40 PM
Cubdriver
Corporate
5
04-09-2010 09:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices