Search

Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

PT6 failures?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2012 | 04:14 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
patience
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default PT6 failures?

Has anyone ever experienced a PT6A engine failure?

If so, what section or component failed, what was the time/cycles on the engine, type of pt6, type aircraft, etc.?
Reply
Old 03-05-2012 | 05:49 PM
  #2  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

A few minutes with google yielded:


The PC-12 is a state-of-the-art single engine turboprop aircraft. Since the first date of
manufacture, all single engine turboprop aircraft combined have compiled over
8,000,000 (eight million) flight hours with no (that’s zero) fatalities due to engine
failure.

http://www.westair.com/images/pdfs/P...%20Article.pdf

The PT6 has earned a reputation for excellent reliability. ATC position paper,2 entitled Commercial Passenger Service-Night/Instrument Meteorological Conditions in Single-Engined Aeroplanes, refers to an optimistic engine failure rate for the Pratt & Whitney PT6 engine of 1/200000hr. The source of this data is not cited.

Feature - Transport Canada


Blade failure:

African Bush Pilot: Caravan Engine failure... severe PT6 (turbo prop engine) malfunction revisited
African Bush Pilot: Bush Pilot highs and lows

Hot section failure:

http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/...507077_002.pdf


When I last flew the Caravan in 2000, there had been no documented engine failures, but there had been a few times when the emergency power lever was used (pneumatic issues).
Reply
Old 03-05-2012 | 06:14 PM
  #3  
withthatsaid182's Avatar
Drinkin' coffee...
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
From: P-p-piiilatusss
Default

I know there have been a few Ng rollbacks in the Pilatus. None of which were recovered with the MOR. They make pretty good gliders with the prop feathered or so I have heard.
Reply
Old 03-05-2012 | 07:04 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default

I have not been impressed with the -66. I don't know if it is because of the pusher design, but I know of many failures.

The one I had was a gearbox failure.
Reply
Old 03-06-2012 | 06:46 PM
  #5  
Planespotta's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
From: Dream within a dream
Default

No failures, a few chip detect lights in the -65B.
That stat from Google says "no (that’s zero) fatalities due to engine failure," not zero engine failures. Wonder if any Platypus drivers out there have lost their big fan...
Reply
Old 03-07-2012 | 06:51 AM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: CRJ900 Fao
Default

-44 power turbine failure (8k+ hours since new)
-20 #3 bearing failure (10k+ hours since new)
-34 FCU failure (15 hrs SOH)
-28 Compressor turbine failure (6k+ since new)
-20 gearbox failure. ( who knows how much)

All were on king airs
Reply
Old 03-07-2012 | 08:39 AM
  #7  
Earl81's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: goin somewhere....
Default

I knew of a caravan with a pratt who lost its oil pump, had to shut down. Pretty rare occurrence losing a pratt but anythings possible
Reply
Old 05-12-2012 | 01:11 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
patience
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by thomasw
-44 power turbine failure (8k+ hours since new)
-20 #3 bearing failure (10k+ hours since new)
-34 FCU failure (15 hrs SOH)
-28 Compressor turbine failure (6k+ since new)
-20 gearbox failure. ( who knows how much)

All were on king airs
That's quite a bit of experience right there.

Were those engines all overhauled at the factory?
Reply
Old 05-15-2012 | 08:35 PM
  #9  
jungle's Avatar
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

I have had one inflight failure due to gearbox self-destruct, chiplight, shutdown and divert in Saudi Arabia. I have witnessed two other failures, one shed most of the turbine through the exhaust leaving some nice dents in those beautiful hand welded parts and another that made it back to base with half of the turbine melted away.

Overall they have proved incredibly reliable though, but like any machine they can and will fail. You can also be struck by lightning. The odds are that neither will happen, but the longer your timeline the more likely a failure.
Reply
Old 05-15-2012 | 08:36 PM
  #10  
jungle's Avatar
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

Originally Posted by thomasw
-44 power turbine failure (8k+ hours since new)
-20 #3 bearing failure (10k+ hours since new)
-34 FCU failure (15 hrs SOH)
-28 Compressor turbine failure (6k+ since new)
-20 gearbox failure. ( who knows how much)

All were on king airs
Snakebit much?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rcfd13
Career Questions
29
09-25-2011 09:24 AM
flygirl579
Regional
121
06-13-2011 06:58 AM
Squawk_5543
Hangar Talk
0
04-05-2007 06:44 AM
Kieran
Technical
30
03-26-2007 08:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices