![]() |
Originally Posted by Ewfflyer
(Post 1318662)
Exactly, even at a tower controlled airport. There's always the chance of someone coming in and not being on freq. My home airport gets crappy and late handoffs from approach to tower. I've had to ask many times after I'm already insides the FAF, just one example.
I would highly suggest just a quick wings level to clear final. You can manage it in a jet, and keep it within a reasonable downwind. |
Originally Posted by TheFly
(Post 1318625)
Do you fly turbine aircraft or instruct in pistons?
|
Originally Posted by ToastAir
(Post 1318760)
Mostly piston singles. I have some turbine time, not much. I know the post was more about larger turbine aircraft. I just felt it important to make the point because every year we lose a few to low altitude stall/spin in the turn to final.
|
...this is from a large TurboProp driver's perspective. In a Cessna 172 or similar, I'd square it every time.
|
I've flown and taught civie square patterns as well as military racetrack circuits, and can tell you that the constant AOB xwind and base turns are superior. Better in terms of traffic flow (by a long shot), and easier to teach glidepath control/energy management.
GA has a lot of advantages over military flying, the landing pattern ain't one of them. -You can check final approach in a turn. -Nobody on this forum invented either the square or racetrack landing pattern. All of us have adopted the techniques we learned as a student as if we did. Try both and learn the pluses and minuses of each one. You'll be a better pilot for doing so. |
Originally Posted by TheFly
(Post 1319046)
...this is from a large TurboProp driver's perspective. In a Cessna 172 or similar, I'd square it every time.
|
Thanks guys!! Great feedback!
|
It all depends on the circumstance. Sometimes you make straight for the numbers or a straight in approach. Other times you may be making wide, square patterns. Other times they may be closer and tighter.
I've done constant turns in small and large aircraft, and in I've done squared patterns in both. When doing a constant turn to final, I like to roll the wings level briefly to clear traffic in the turn. Don't confuse cross controlled stalls with tightening the turn a little. Don't get in the habit of thinking that crossing the controls is going to cause a disaster, either. That's usually the thinking of someone who heard it from someone else, ad infinitum, in the training pipeline. I do a lot of tight patterns and non-standard patterns, overhead and midfield entries, direct entries to base, straight in, and so on...they've all got their place depending on the circumstances...and in other cases they shouldn't be used due to traffic, terrain, ATC requirements, local airport policies, etc. It's best to have a variety of techniques and practices that you can safely and comfortably use. In all cases, including continuous turns, you're not breaking any rules by taking time for safety, leveling or raising a wing briefly, or widening out a little to allow a shallower bank and more time. On stalls, remember that you control whether the airplane stalls. |
Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
(Post 1318641)
I'm personally a big advocate for wings level for at least a second while on base so that you can clear final.
Originally Posted by N9373M
(Post 1318660)
Ding Ding Ding - winner! One last check for traffic on final.
Originally Posted by Ewfflyer
(Post 1318662)
There's always the chance of someone coming in and not being on freq.
The thing is, you don't have to be turning to final to have it happen either. I've seen guys fly straight into base while I'm on downwind getting ready to turn base (instead of entering on the 45 to downwind) without making any radio call, and I've also been on a left base-to-final only to see someone else on a right base-to-final, coming straight at me. It's amazing, but some people still fly without radios, much less not being on freq. If it's uncontrolled, my head is on a swivel no matter where in the pattern I'm located, and I follow entry and pattern procedures to the letter. It's why they were established in the first place. .02 |
I agree that it depends but from my experience, flying at three carriers, most guys fly a fairly standard pattern.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands