Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Difference between Vo and Va? >

Difference between Vo and Va?

Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Difference between Vo and Va?

Old 03-14-2015, 11:12 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 317
Default

Originally Posted by paladin View Post
Here is a further quote from FAR.23 amendment 45: “Va should not be interpreted as a speed that would permit the pilot unrestricted flight control movement without exceeding airplane structural limits!” This is why ‘they’ had to create Vo.
This. You comply with maneuvering speed by having a speed equal to or less than Vs√n where n= load factor. Va did not satisfy this, but was being taught as though it did. Vo is maneuvering speed in the sense that full deflection will result in a stall before an airframe is bent or broken. I'd suggest reading Subpart C: Structure in Part 23.
shdw is offline  
Old 03-17-2015, 08:13 AM
  #12  
Administrator
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default

Only difference Snickers can see is a vowel.
vagabond is offline  
Old 03-17-2015, 01:52 PM
  #13  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Snickers gets a bone! Correct answer.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 08-19-2023, 07:33 AM
  #14  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Aug 2023
Posts: 1
Default

Student pilot here - has been thinking about this question for the past 2 days and found this forum, very helpful! I will try to describe my understanding below, correction welcomed!

Vs = stall speed (weight dependent)
n = design load factor limit (weight dependent)

Making up some variables for ease of substitution:

A = critical AoA
W = aircraft weight (variable)
L = design wing loading limit (weight independent, the actual aircraft would have margins over it). L = W * n
S = speed at which L is reached at A. S = Vs * sqrt(n)

So:

Va = design maneuvering speed, greater than or equal to S, which is used to design the control surfaces to withstand the load at full deflection at the speed.
Vo = operating maneuvering speed, Vo <= S. Under Vo, aircraft will stall before reaching L or any other structural limit
bigfoot2003 is offline  
Old 08-19-2023, 12:44 PM
  #15  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,089
Default

Someone's been reading Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators, haven't they?

The notion that the structure will stall before damage occurs is inherent in aircraft design: the gist is that there is a value at which structural damage won't occur under a given gust load or structural loading imposed by say, full control deflection, or a gust load imposed at a particular speed. That criterial is applied to many elements of design and certification. However, with respect to the end user, pilots, considering Va, or maneuvering speed, pilots were taught for many years that it was the speed below which a full control deflection would result in airflow separation (stall) before a damaging load could be imposed. The problem is that such an explanation is too simplistic, and it's wrong.

One can break an airplane below Va, because when we consider a fullly deflected control surface, for example, we consider the singular load imposed by that isolated event. Pull back on the control stick, raise the elevator, load the elevator surface and hinges, stab attach points and stab, and wing, wing spars, attach points, etc, and in theory...it won't break. But that's just one pull. In that loading, there's bending and flexing, torsion, compression, and tension, and when we apply a second load, say for example, to reverse the control input, we don't simply load in the opposite direction. We impose a series of unintended loads that are not explained by the purpose of Va...more than one control input, especially opposite or reverse inputs, can impose loads that do exceed the structural integrity of the aircraft, causing damage or failure.

The crash of American Airlines 587 in Jamaica Bay (New York) was an eye-opener to some, who believed the myth that the aircraft couldn't be damaged at low speeds. It can. Multiple control inputs, alternating inputs and rapid inputs alter the equation and the complexity of the load, and exceed or act outside the established limitation and the so-called protection of operating under that speed.
JohnBurke is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices