Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Union Talk
TSA Gives Green Light for Next Phase of ALPA >

TSA Gives Green Light for Next Phase of ALPA

Search
Notices
Union Talk For macro-level discussion: legislation, national unions, organizing pilot groups, etc.
For airline-specific discussion, use relevant forum above.

TSA Gives Green Light for Next Phase of ALPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2009, 02:53 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default TSA Gives Green Light for Next Phase of ALPA

ALPA president Capt. John Prater and National Security Committee chairman Capt. Robb Powers (Alaska) this week met with Transportation Security Administration Acting Administrator Gale Rossides to discuss CrewPASS and other security issues.


Rossides reported that TSA has approved the next phase of the CrewPASS project. The pre-operational phase of this demonstration is to begin by May 1, and the CrewPASS contractor, ARINC, will replace the ALPA-loaned laptops with new Internet-capable devices that will provide both employment status confirmation and identity verification via fingerprint biometrics. TSA has approved the deployment of this equipment at all three current CrewPASS locations (BWI, PIT, and CAE) and will add one additional terminal at BWI for a total of four lanes.


ARINC will begin enrolling pilots in the CrewPASS system in the near future, and ALPA will help the company advertise the biometric enrollment venue and date information. Flight crews will still be able to use all four lanes without biometrics for an extended period of time.


Next steps for CrewPASS include the publication of program standards by TSA, which would include nationwide implementation, inclusion of flight attendants, and other measures.


Prater and Powers also spoke to Rossides about ALPA’s views regarding needed improvements to the Federal Flight Deck Officer (FFDO) program, all-cargo operations security, the development of standards for secondary barriers, and the need for approving international jumpseating via the Cockpit Access Security System (CASS).
Nevets is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 02:58 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Default

Am I the only one who is incredibly frustrated with the fact that there are so many pilot groups fending for themselves in negotiations, but ALPA's main concern is getting me through security 5 minutes quicker?

I think my airline's MEC is doing a great job, but sometimes I wonder what ALPA national's priorities are.
250 or point 65 is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 03:05 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bryris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Hotel
Posts: 714
Default

Originally Posted by 250 or point 65 View Post
Am I the only one who is incredibly frustrated with the fact that there are so many pilot groups fending for themselves in negotiations, but ALPA's main concern is getting me through security 5 minutes quicker?

I think my airline's MEC is doing a great job, but sometimes I wonder what ALPA national's priorities are.
Just because you might have a few battles pending doesn't mean you've got to tie your wrists and do nothing else. If ALPA was continuously dropping the ball, then I'd get it.
bryris is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 03:14 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Default

I don't know, if I were making 95% of my salary while on furlough like the UAW, I may be a little more interested the Capt Prater commercial.
250 or point 65 is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 05:43 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyerfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: A320 Right
Posts: 219
Default

I would have rather you said thanks to all the ALPA companies' pilots who pay dues for the organization to drive programs like this.

Don't worry I'm sure non ALPA carriers will hate hate not having to go through security anymore when CREWPASS goes nation wide.

Your welcome!
flyerfly is offline  
Old 04-26-2009, 02:01 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Default

You can thank me as well, I paid those dues too.
250 or point 65 is offline  
Old 04-26-2009, 06:55 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
John Pennekamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Posts: 876
Default

As someone else said, I'd rather ALPA at least captures the small stuff than does nothing at all.

And YES, going through security while working a flight is an asinine dog and pony show that needs to be stopped. I'm glad ALPA is doing something about it.
John Pennekamp is offline  
Old 04-26-2009, 09:21 AM
  #8  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by 250 or point 65 View Post
I don't know, if I were making 95% of my salary while on furlough like the UAW, I may be a little more interested the Capt Prater commercial.
I don't think that is going to last. If they want more govt help it will have to go, and if they don't then they will have to file BK and then it will most certainly be gone.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 04-26-2009, 02:48 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bryris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Hotel
Posts: 714
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
I don't think that is going to last. If they want more govt help it will have to go, and if they don't then they will have to file BK and then it will most certainly be gone.
Yep. GM, especially, is basically a health care insurer that happens to make vehicles on the side. I haven't reviewed their financials myself, but I've heard from reliable sources that for every vehicle they make, they lose money. IOW, at this point, its not a matter of producing more vehicles to reduce the fixed cost per unit to eventually create a profit - the numbers just don't work. Every single vehicle that gets emitted at the end of the production line represents a loss to the company.

These costs will have to be shed for there to be a future for the company.

Honestly, the airlines are in a similar boat. The trend (see WN) is to not provide a pension anymore. Some legacies might potentially force themselves into bankruptcy to then be granted some relief from the existing (already cut down) pensions.

The new guys getting on board - fuggetaboutit. Better be conservative with your money going forth.
bryris is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
elcid79
Union Talk
17
06-01-2011 06:58 AM
Boogie Nights
Union Talk
22
04-14-2009 09:10 PM
APM145
Union Talk
0
02-15-2009 04:23 PM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM
WAVIT Inbound
Regional
1
09-18-2008 10:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices