Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Bumps (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/100858-bumps.html)

Probe 04-03-2017 08:18 PM


Originally Posted by svergin (Post 2335479)
This. Since we are talking 50 now and the rest in 6 months, plus the 5 months it will take to train everyone, this shouldn't affect much.

Now if they close IAH 787 then THAT will cause secondary and tertiary displacements in IAH.

Yep. The only thing is I think the vast majority are going to bid the 777 and 787. I don't think either fleet has the training capacity to train all those pilots in a timely manner. I wouldn't be surprised if 50-100 pilots sit around for 6-12 months waiting for training. Or take bump rights again.

ugleeual 04-04-2017 09:30 AM


Originally Posted by Probe (Post 2335936)
Yep. The only thing is I think the vast majority are going to bid the 777 and 787. I don't think either fleet has the training capacity to train all those pilots in a timely manner. I wouldn't be surprised if 50-100 pilots sit around for 6-12 months waiting for training. Or take bump rights again.

all depends... if they previously qual'd on the 777/787 the pipeline is much shorter. I don't think this is going to be as big a backlog as people are thinking.

blockplus 04-04-2017 12:49 PM

there are no secondary bump rights... just beach pay

DashTrash 04-04-2017 02:05 PM

Now HA says there are going to be bumps out of GUM in both seats. Better A/C utilization.

UALinIAH 04-04-2017 02:56 PM


Originally Posted by DashTrash (Post 2336396)
Now HA says there are going to be bumps out of GUM in both seats. Better A/C utilization.

Pretty crappy deal. 7 CA 5 FO? You can't manage to have 12 extra pilots at a domicile?

pilotgolfer 04-04-2017 03:05 PM


Originally Posted by UALinIAH (Post 2336416)
Pretty crappy deal. 7 CA 5 FO? You can't manage to have 12 extra pilots at a domicile?

The senior guys wanted to keep the line values above 115. Reducing headcount was the only option.

bigfatdaddy 04-04-2017 03:14 PM


Originally Posted by pilotgolfer (Post 2336422)
The senior guys wanted to keep the line values above 115. Reducing headcount was the only option.

One word......greed

krudawg 04-04-2017 03:26 PM


Originally Posted by bigfatdaddy (Post 2336424)
One word......greed

I guess only the "other guy" is greedy. Greed is nothing more than economic self-interest. You probably worked hard to live in a nice home - that's economic self interest. When you save your extra money you make to send your kids to college or work an extra day to buy your wife a nice gift for her birthday - that's economic self interest. Some may call you greedy but you are working for economic self interest to make a better life for you and your family.

jsled 04-04-2017 03:56 PM

The April LPA in GUM shows 77 for Captains, 73.5 for FOs. They are fat city now, and after the bumps and the loss of NRT-ICN, they'll still be fat.

pilotgolfer 04-04-2017 04:25 PM


Originally Posted by jsled (Post 2336454)
The April LPA in GUM shows 77 for Captains, 73.5 for FOs. They are fat city now, and after the bumps and the loss of NRT-ICN, they'll still be fat.

I said 115 in jest... I assumed it was a fairly obvious exaggeration for effect. Poking fun at the EWR 777 guy that said it was an unfair pay cut now that the union pulled the waiver for PBS line construction.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands