![]() |
Den756
With the company announcement of a DEN 756 base reopening, I would like to hear what the flying was like when the base existed before. I am probably a ways from holding it, really just curious. I've flown with guys that held it and they spoke of flying 3 Hawaii trips per month. Probably transcons as well I'm guessing.
|
Originally Posted by 130drvr
(Post 2377375)
With the company announcement of a DEN 756 base reopening, I would like to hear what the flying was like when the base existed before. I am probably a ways from holding it, really just curious. I've flown with guys that held it and they spoke of flying 3 Hawaii trips per month. Probably transcons as well I'm guessing.
|
There was probably some other trips like transcons thrown in. Just curious what the flying was like, good and bad(if any).
|
Originally Posted by 130drvr
(Post 2377388)
There was probably some other trips like transcons thrown in. Just curious what the flying was like, good and bad(if any).
|
Originally Posted by 130drvr
(Post 2377375)
With the company announcement of a DEN 756 base reopening, I would like to hear what the flying was like when the base existed before. I am probably a ways from holding it, really just curious. I've flown with guys that held it and they spoke of flying 3 Hawaii trips per month. Probably transcons as well I'm guessing.
|
When they shut us down, we were doing a lot of hub to hub, hub to MCO, LAS, BOS, and PS transcons. We had daily HNL (not summer), and Saturday LIH and KOA. I think today KOA is like 3 times a week. We also did OGG (not sure of frequency) and other HI trips from the LAX/SFO.
Sled |
Originally Posted by A320
(Post 2377403)
When was this announced
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 2377406)
When they shut us down, we were doing a lot of hub to hub, hub to MCO, LAS, BOS, and PS transcons. We had daily HNL (not summer), and Saturday LIH and KOA. I think today KOA is like 3 times a week. We also did OGG (not sure of frequency) and other HI trips from the LAX/SFO.
Sled |
Originally Posted by rp2pilot
(Post 2377401)
Short answer.. Very senior :)
|
Will the L-UAL guys have grandfather rights or super seniority...or is that something only the Cal guys think they are entitled to?
|
Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
(Post 2377430)
Will the L-UAL guys have grandfather rights or super seniority...or is that something only the Cal guys think they are entitled to? ������
|
Originally Posted by rp2pilot
(Post 2377439)
There used to be wording in that contract that granted grandfather rights IF the base reopened within a certain time frame. I can't find that in section 8; anyone know the answer?
|
8-C-6 (so called Grandfather Rights)
8-C-6 When a vacancy or vacancies occur in a Category from which a Pilot(s) has been displaced under the provisions of Section 8-E, the displaced Pilot(s) shall, for a period of 120 days beyond the effective date of his displacement, be offered in order of seniority the vacancy prior to awarding that position under the provisions of Section 8-C-5. This 120 day period is measured from the effective date of the displacement to the date on which the vacancy bulletin is published.
|
Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
(Post 2377430)
Will the L-UAL guys have grandfather rights or super seniority...or is that something only the Cal guys think they are entitled to? ������
|
Originally Posted by No Nonsense
(Post 2377507)
8-C-6 When a vacancy or vacancies occur in a Category from which a Pilot(s) has been displaced under the provisions of Section 8-E, the displaced Pilot(s) shall, for a period of 120 days beyond the effective date of his displacement, be offered in order of seniority the vacancy prior to awarding that position under the provisions of Section 8-C-5. This 120 day period is measured from the effective date of the displacement to the date on which the vacancy bulletin is published.
|
Originally Posted by 130drvr
(Post 2377375)
With the company announcement of a DEN 756 base reopening, I would like to hear what the flying was like when the base existed before. I am probably a ways from holding it, really just curious. I've flown with guys that held it and they spoke of flying 3 Hawaii trips per month. Probably transcons as well I'm guessing.
There was a short time when the 767 would fly a Hawaii W over five days. DEN HNL SFO HNL DEN. Two nights in HNL and one in SFO, but that was a very rare trip and I believe only one summer. |
Originally Posted by Regularguy
(Post 2377540)
. Many here have little clue that most of us lUAL pilots did not fly more than 78 hours a month. A big time month was 83 hours unlike today's line holders who regularly manage 90+ hours.
|
Originally Posted by rp2pilot
(Post 2377541)
If I remember correctly, wasn't line pay value capped at 85 hours with everything above that going into a bank to be payed out in the following months?
|
LGA-DEN..
Flown out of EWR base (75-3). 2 day, pays a little over 10hrs + crosstown pay. About 8ish flt hours. Another type of trip that can be flown out of the DEN 765 base. Saves 60 hotel rooms, 60 xtown pays, 30 limos. There's probably a bunch of turns they can do, along with 3 and 4 day trips that will pay M5D but not invoke Trig Rig. Opening any BES is a good thing. Means the company is trying to utilize the fleet/manpower efficiently. Up to us to make sure we have contractual protections to make it beneficial to us.. Either a higer MinPayPer Day, better Trip Rigs or better Profit Sharing. Wonder how big the base will be? Motch |
Originally Posted by horrido27
(Post 2377672)
LGA-DEN..
Flown out of EWR base (75-3). 2 day, pays a little over 10hrs + crosstown pay. About 8ish flt hours. Another type of trip that can be flown out of the DEN 765 base. Saves 60 hotel rooms, 60 xtown pays, 30 limos. There's probably a bunch of turns they can do, along with 3 and 4 day trips that will pay M5D but not invoke Trig Rig. Opening any BES is a good thing. Means the company is trying to utilize the fleet/manpower efficiently. Up to us to make sure we have contractual protections to make it beneficial to us.. Either a higer MinPayPer Day, better Trip Rigs or better Profit Sharing. Wonder how big the base will be? Motch |
Originally Posted by davessn763
(Post 2377707)
What base is going to shrink or close? The small bases are around 100 crews.
|
I flew the 10 and 727 out of there for a brief period. London and Hawaii on the 10, alot of different stuff on the 72.
The base shrank as the loss margins widened with the LCC's invasion and marketing realized ( and admitted), that Denver is a relatively small remote city with little O and D traffic. The reason Denver opened in the first place was that prior to jets, everyone needed a refueling stop between the coastal hubs. Denver will open, grow and shrink again when this current group of marketing gurus admit it's a loser for anything larger than 150 seats. Always has been. Finally to answer your question; the flying will be very inconsistent as marketing hunts and pecks for yield in a thin market. |
Originally Posted by BMEP100
(Post 2377791)
I flew the 10 and 727 out of there for a brief period. London and Hawaii on the 10, alot of different stuff on the 72.
The base shrank as the loss margins widened with the LCC's invasion and marketing realized ( and admitted), that Denver is a relatively small remote city with little O and D traffic. The reason Denver opened in the first place was that prior to jets, everyone needed a refueling stop between the coastal hubs. Denver will open, grow and shrink again when this current group of marketing gurus admit it's a loser for anything larger than 150 seats. Always has been. Finally to answer your question; the flying will be very inconsistent as marketing hunts and pecks for yield in a thin market. |
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 2377816)
I At our flight ops pow wows, management has consistently opined that "Denver is our most profitable hub".
Last I heard SFO had the number one spot. A quick check shows Denver ranked at number 18 by GDP in US metro areas, wedged firmly between Baltimore and San Diego, below other such megalopolises as Detroit, Minneapolis and Seattle. Confirms my belief about marketing Turks. edit; I just realized that we could take on Icelandair to Keflavik. Nevermind.. |
For BMEP (I underlined DEN's O&D ranking): https://www.flydenver.com/about/pres...senger_traffic
In 2016, DEN saw a record-setting 58.3 million passengers This ranks DEN as the third-fastest growing airport in the world, behind only Kuala Lumpur and Delhi DEN as the sixth busiest airport in the U.S. and 19th busiest in the world (according to 2015 numbers. 2016 figures have yet to be released) Approximately 65 percent of travelers at DEN are origination and destination (O&D) passengers, and 35 percent are connecting Approximately 35 million annual domestic passengers are O&D passengers, making DEN the fourth-largest domestic O&D hub in the U.S. International traffic at DEN accounts for approximately 2.2 million passengers annually – approximately 4 percent of the airport’s total passenger traffic |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 2377903)
For BMEP (I underlined DEN's O&D ranking): https://www.flydenver.com/about/pres...senger_traffic
In 2016, DEN saw a record-setting 58.3 million passengers This ranks DEN as the third-fastest growing airport in the world, behind only Kuala Lumpur and Delhi DEN as the sixth busiest airport in the U.S. and 19th busiest in the world (according to 2015 numbers. 2016 figures have yet to be released) Approximately 65 percent of travelers at DEN are origination and destination (O&D) passengers, and 35 percent are connecting Approximately 35 million annual domestic passengers are O&D passengers, making DEN the fourth-largest domestic O&D hub in the U.S. International traffic at DEN accounts for approximately 2.2 million passengers annually – approximately 4 percent of the airport’s total passenger traffic Were these figures compiled by Denver airport authority or their lobbyists, I wonder. Their source citation is "Denver Marketing". Curious they didn't use DoT data or link their reports. |
Originally Posted by BMEP100
(Post 2377945)
As someone pointed out. Southwest has done a remarkable job in Denver... of creating a market. It's just not our market.
Were these figures compiled by Denver airport authority or their lobbyists, I wonder. Their source citation is "Denver Marketing". Curious they didn't use DoT data or link their reports. I tried to sift through the DoT data before posting that link/quote. In spite of spending half an hour or so, I wasn't able to find where DoT hides those numbers. YMMV. If you can find a current list of top O&D cities in the US, please post it. I've seen other (older) posts on different websites where DEN was near the top of the list for O&D. Others at/near the top were NYC, LAX, LAS, MCO. Denver has a lot of regional headquarters for Federal agencies so I could see where it generates a lot of O&D traffic, not to mention O&D from all of the skiers in the winter. |
Here are the numbers for 2016 domestic origin/destination for all our hubs from the DOT:
Chicago (all airports) 2,360,000 Houston (all airports) 1,109,000 New York (all airports)= 3,391,000 Wash DC (all airports)= 2,116,000 Cle = 418,000 Denver = 1,563,000 LA (all airports)= 3,168,000 SFO (all airports)= 2,483,000 https://www.transtats.bts.gov/Oneway...d=&sort_order= |
Originally Posted by BMEP100
(Post 2377791)
I flew the 10 and 727 out of there for a brief period. London and Hawaii on the 10, alot of different stuff on the 72.
The base shrank as the loss margins widened with the LCC's invasion and marketing realized ( and admitted), that Denver is a relatively small remote city with little O and D traffic. The reason Denver opened in the first place was that prior to jets, everyone needed a refueling stop between the coastal hubs. Denver will open, grow and shrink again when this current group of marketing gurus admit it's a loser for anything larger than 150 seats. Always has been. Finally to answer your question; the flying will be very inconsistent as marketing hunts and pecks for yield in a thin market. The decisions made now won't be validated for 2-5 years. I hope it works, but I just turn the wheel, and pull the gear handle. But I do pay attention, and have skin in the game. If the company is going to continue to make monumental staffing changes every 2-5 years, maybe a monumental change to our commuter policy might be an important bullet to start our next negotiations. But, I agree with BMEP. |
The 757 departures are already here. A base will just save a sheet ton of cash in crew hotels according to Howard. In any case, apparently it's gonna happen, and it's a boon for us Denver dwellers. Bring it on baby! Wheeeew. :cool:
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 2378061)
The 757 departures are already here. A base will just save a sheet ton of cash in crew hotels according to Howard. In any case, apparently it's gonna happen, and it's a boon for us Denver dwellers. Bring it on baby! Wheeeew. :cool:
FL D_ / DEN-14JUN/ / / 757/ 767/ FL# Dpt Dest 691 -0808 :00 EWR 3120 :00 :50 1758 -1145 :00 KOA 3109 :00 :50 1736 -1150 :00 OGG 3135 :00 :50 1209 -1400 :00 EWR 3139 :00 :50 |
Originally Posted by GoCats67
(Post 2378065)
Right now there are 4 departures a day during the week. I would have to assume that number is planned to increase with a base opening.
FL D_ / DEN-14JUN/ / / 757/ 767/ FL# Dpt Dest 691 -0808 :00 EWR 3120 :00 :50 1758 -1145 :00 KOA 3109 :00 :50 1736 -1150 :00 OGG 3135 :00 :50 1209 -1400 :00 EWR 3139 :00 :50 |
HNL was a 777 year round at least this past year and as of now the timetable shows it staying on the 777.
|
Originally Posted by Eagle06
(Post 2378072)
HNL was a 777 year round at least this past year and as of now the timetable shows it staying on the 777.
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 2378061)
The 757 departures are already here. A base will just save a sheet ton of cash in crew hotels according to Howard. In any case, apparently it's gonna happen, and it's a boon for us Denver dwellers. Bring it on baby! Wheeeew. :cool:
I think they have more 757 cycles in an hour than DEN does in a day. Okay, maybe 2 hours. |
Originally Posted by BMEP100
(Post 2377945)
As someone pointed out. Southwest has done a remarkable job in Denver... of creating a market. It's just not our market.
Were these figures compiled by Denver airport authority or their lobbyists, I wonder. Their source citation is "Denver Marketing". Curious they didn't use DoT data or link their reports. |
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
(Post 2377587)
Continental had that. You could bank up to twenty five hours and draw from it in a light month or you could get it all paid out in a vacation month.
I don't totally recall the particulars because I was on perpetual reserve and never did exceed to cap even when a line holder. |
Originally Posted by svergin
(Post 2377760)
I heard once they staffed DEN 756 fully with 150 crews, they would start to reduce IAH 756 by the same number.
How many departures a day are there in DEN now? Looking at all the bid packs for may there are only a few overnights at DEN compared to EWR, SFO, and ORD. seems like plussing up ORD would make more sense if they are looking to reduce expensive overnights. |
Originally Posted by davessn763
(Post 2378272)
Is DEN 756 going to fly the current South America and MUC trips as a W or are those flights going to be cancelled? IAH does very few DEN overnights now, and most domestic overnights are EWR and ORD. I think EWR LAX and SFO do most of the DEN fyling now.
How many departures a day are there in DEN now? Looking at all the bid packs for may there are only a few overnights at DEN compared to EWR, SFO, and ORD. seems like plussing up ORD would make more sense if they are looking to reduce expensive overnights. As far as central/south America, some of that flying could be from LA, SFO, ORD, IAD, EWR. All of those cities have a large Hispanic population. I used to fly LAX-SAL quite a bit pre-911; the flight was always full. In order to fly that route on UA metal, one must now connect through IAH. I wouldn't bother overthinking this. |
Originally Posted by Black Coffee
(Post 2378160)
Denver has been one of our most successful cities in the history of Southwest Airlines, if not the most according to Gary Kelly. I think we hit 217 flights a day this month, and we have 820 pilots based in Denver. We add about 20 pilots a month on the vacancy awards. We are adding more gates on the east side of the C concourse and we would grow more if they could hire ground ops faster. We just passed over 1000 rampers and I think they need to hire 350 more. Denver is now a maintenance base for us and I wouldn't be surprised if Southwest doesn't buy or build a hanger. Denver flight ops says the base will be a mega station. Probably over 1000 pilots some time next year. We are flying full in and out of Denver constantly, AM's or PM's it doesn't matter.
That's awesome. Somebody must of forgot to tell Mr. Kelly that Denver is a remote city with little O & D traffic. :D Denver is growing like a weed...pun intended. ;) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:34 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands