Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Do job fairs really make a difference? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/104614-do-job-fairs-really-make-difference.html)

Grumble 08-13-2017 01:00 PM


Originally Posted by Zenofzin (Post 2409941)
I was only commenting on his post regarding American, guess I didn't know about the numbers of guys struggling in training and being fired on probation like apparently you do. :D. Only know what I see on line and new guys coming from 121 backgrounds and higher time guys are really great to fly with when they are brand new on the equipment. A number of guys I've flown with from fighter backgrounds have really low time and experience like 1200-1400 total time over a 20 year career, and it sometimes shows, especially with weather, MEL and operational issues, but they are all sharp guys and catch on, just a bigger learning curve for some. IMHO. I felt like CAL did a really great job of every class being a mix of 121/military/charter/corporate/regional backgrounds. Seems like each class was a few of each.

Agree on all...

So if you're in favor of the even mix of new hire classes and the end results why would you then hamstring guys based on background in your other post?

Btw Anyone that finishes a 20 year fighter career with <2000 hours didn't try very hard, especially with the OPTEMPO of the last 15 years.

Airhoss 08-13-2017 01:28 PM


Originally Posted by Grumble (Post 2409927)
Interesting... seeing as how the KC-135/C-130 guys in my new hire class struggled the most, the regional guys have the highest rate of being let go from training/probation and the fighter guys seem to work the hardest (with the heavy guys).

I'd need to see some actual data on that one. Having been in the training arena off and on for some time now. I can say with absolute certainty that background is almost never an indicator of how a pilot is going to do in training.

I've seen really good ones and really bad ones from every background.

That Guy 74 08-13-2017 01:35 PM


Originally Posted by gringo (Post 2409570)
Same boat. Same situation. Second day, afternoon session. "Best of the best" they said, interview practically guaranteed.

Still waiting for a call.

It's all a crap shoot.

Won't hurt to attend a job fair. Whether it helps is largely a coin toss.

Brother, I'm in the same boat you are.

Just keeping my nose to the grindstone and hoping for some Hogan assessment to pop into my email when hiring resumes.

Keep the faith.

That Guy 74 08-13-2017 01:40 PM


Originally Posted by Zenofzin (Post 2409778)
Having been in the airline business for quite a while if I was in charge of hiring it would be 1. Regional Guys 2. Military large transport c130 c5 tanker guys etc. 3. Corporate /charter. 4. Fighter pilots. Sorry but guys flying fighters don't have much total time at all, and come from a much different experience base and a lot of times it shows.

I work for a large 135 operator on a closed charter, membership-based contract.

I have to wonder if anyone with a purely military/airline background understands what is involved in working for some of the upper tier 135 gigs (NOT the 134.95 operators), ESPECIALLY if you are a standards/instructor, line check airman, supervisor, etc.

I have to think not...

Rook 08-13-2017 03:24 PM


Originally Posted by embskillz (Post 2407864)

rack him!!!!!!

Learflyer 08-13-2017 05:20 PM


Originally Posted by BAe3100FO (Post 2409777)
I cringe when I hear the words "best of the best" or "guaranteed"...

It is cringeworthy for whom they think is "best of the best" nowadays. Being the president of the local chapter of WIA isn't best of the best. Experience used to mean "best of the best."

Grumble 08-13-2017 05:28 PM


Originally Posted by Airhoss (Post 2409967)
I'd need to see some actual data on that one. Having been in the training arena off and on for some time now. I can say with absolute certainty that background is almost never an indicator of how a pilot is going to do in training.

I've seen really good ones and really bad ones from every background.

Purely observation that was in direct contravention to his assertions.

Now, everyone over to the new B6 thread.

Airhoss 08-13-2017 08:51 PM


Originally Posted by Grumble (Post 2410083)
Purely observation that was in direct contravention to his assertions.

Now, everyone over to the new B6 thread.

Onward Christian Soldiers!!

Airway 08-15-2017 08:20 AM


Originally Posted by Grumble (Post 2409927)
I
the regional guys have the highest rate of being let go from training/probation and the fighter guys seem to work the hardest (with the heavy guys).

Haven't heard of a single pilot being let go. But hey, I don't hear everything.

Airhoss 08-15-2017 08:48 AM


Originally Posted by Airway (Post 2410942)
Haven't heard of a single pilot being let go. But hey, I don't hear everything.

Several years ago there was a smart phone abusing Skywester who got let go during initial training. Which would, in fact back up Grumbles claim of "more" regional guys being let go. :rolleyes:


And as you mentioned a new hire being fired is extrodanairly rare. I have not worked with any "bad" new hire students. Fighter guys and C-17 guys can't make a decent cross wind landing. Everybody has issues with the FMC at first. Some people over think/ over study, some show up for their 4 AM briefing smelling like cheap perfume and still have stripper glitter in their hair. Back ground simply isn't a factor. The absoloutley the most challenging student I had when I was on the the 756 was a new hire A-10 guy. He did not know how to do a challenge and response check list and the FMC completely scrambled his brain.

With a little extra time he did just fine. Unless a person has a serious attitude problem they are going to make it through initial training. The Skywest guy who was let go had an attitude problem.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands