Requested Award prevents solution completion
Can someone tell me exactly what that means? I get these often. I have a vague idea but I'm guessing this has something to do with global solution..
|
Originally Posted by Airway
(Post 2449541)
Can someone tell me exactly what that means? I get these often. I have a vague idea but I'm guessing this has something to do with global solution..
|
Originally Posted by osuav8r
(Post 2449543)
Yup, the "solution" is the global solution. IE. You can hold a line with the constraints you put in the bid group, but if the system gives it to you, it will prevent it from building complete lines down to the G line. It's throwing you under the bus to be able to build the number of lines the company has required the system to build.
|
Hence why the whole G line needs to go away.
|
Originally Posted by Airway
(Post 2449552)
Ok, that's what I kind of thought. Thanks.
|
Originally Posted by webecheck
(Post 2449598)
In essence, the solution is more important than your seniority. We've all been burned by it.
|
It's not just producing a legal line for each line-bidder at, or above, the g-line. That is one constraint that the solver must meet but there are others. The solver must also meet other requirements such as the amount of unassigned flying and daily reserve coverage.
With traditional line-bidding there are similar constraints but they are applied to the lines prior to the bidding process. In that process you don't get to ask for things that aren't already built into the lines. You have to hope that a line that you can hold already has what you want. With PBS you get to ask, and you can often get, attributes that would never have been built into hard lines without PBS. The way to avoid this is to have more Bid Groups which systematically relax your constraints so that you can get as much of what you want as your seniority will allow. |
Originally Posted by Larry in TN
(Post 2449676)
It's not just producing a legal line for each line-bidder at, or above, the g-line. That is one constraint that the solver must meet but there are others. The solver must also meet other requirements such as the amount of unassigned flying and daily reserve coverage.
With traditional line-bidding there are similar constraints but they are applied to the lines prior to the bidding process. In that process you don't get to ask for things that aren't already built into the lines. You have to hope that a line that you can hold already has what you want. With PBS you get to ask, and you can often get, attributes that would never have been built into hard lines without PBS. The way to avoid this is to have more Bid Groups which systematically relax your constraints so that you can get as much of what you want as your seniority will allow. |
Originally Posted by UAL seasoned
(Post 2449696)
Yep, did that for November. Built 11 bid groups, and was awarded number 10! Oh well, what do you expect bidding at 93% of the G-line...and holding any line is better than commuting to reserve!
|
Can’t stand this bidding system. It is astonishingly terrible.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands