Originally Posted by horrido27
(Post 2452909)
Not sure your point...
The point is that the formal opportunity for pilots to provide feedback to negotiators has concluded. Pilots were invited by the NC to rank priorities in preparation for the section 6, and the results have been tallied, analyzed, and presented. After thousands of data points from PDRs, contract surveys, and council resolutions, the NC is inasmuch broadcasting "we hear you". The process is underway, so yes, it's entertaining to watch everyone in this thread chase their tails and draw lines in the sand. In about a year from now, members in good standing will get a vote. |
Originally Posted by awax
(Post 2452929)
Figures.
The point is that the formal opportunity for pilots to provide feedback to negotiators has concluded. Pilots were invited by the NC to rank priorities in preparation for the section 6, and the results have been tallied, analyzed, and presented. After thousands of data points from PDRs, contract surveys, and council resolutions, the NC is inasmuch broadcasting "we hear you". The process is underway, so yes, it's entertaining to watch everyone in this thread chase their tails and draw lines in the sand. In about a year from now, members in good standing will get a vote. |
Originally Posted by Boeing Aviator
(Post 2452935)
Non Consessionary Scope - but I have faith our MEC would never let this see a membership vote
Over the next 13 months we'll see posts full of anger, greed, fear, unity, hope, and unbridled avarice. You know, the full spectrum. Done right (absent leaks) the line pilots will feel like mushrooms, which nobody likes, and is intolerable to some. Many will be offended by the opener, which is largely a wish list, but still we'll see a segment of the membership get spun into the ceiling anyway. I think the RLA section 6 process is ill-suited for internet speed and information junkies will be miserable. The big picture is that we have a strong MEC that's in tune with the pilot group and we're favorable negotiating climate for pilot labor. I have a vote that I hope to cast sometime next year, and beyond that, I'm keeping the powder dry and getting ready to enjoy the holidays. |
Originally Posted by EwrRocks
(Post 2451665)
They want more 175 RJs and are capped currently. Kirby has spoken about Delta killing us in these 175 type cities and that is where we need to close gap. Of course carrot of it being tied to mainline growth is also always through out there.
|
Originally Posted by fadec
(Post 2453000)
As a result their junior captain has a seniority number equal to the size of our entire list.
BTW, are we calling the CS100/300 an Airbus yet? |
DAL is also getting around scope by configuring 175’s with fewer seats.
|
Originally Posted by crflyer
(Post 2453071)
DAL is also getting around scope by configuring 175’s with fewer seats.
If United wants a new 175 with 70 seats they can have it but they will have to park 1 other 70 seater. 1:1 that’s their only option. |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 2453159)
At United there is a limit to 70 seaters once a certain level of 76 seaters is reached, and we are at that level. No more 70 seaters OR 76 seaters can be added unless we introduce a New Short Narowbody. That’s why Skywest CRJ-700s have been getting removed from United service.
If United wants a new 175 with 70 seats they can have it but they will have to park 1 other 70 seater. 1:1 that’s their only option. However, did I read somewhere that United is getting it's "regional partners" to dust off a bunch of 50 seaters? I don't want UAL to try to compete with Delta with RJ's. I want UAL to compete with big boy and big girl jets. |
I fly......they manage
|
Originally Posted by libertyrisk
(Post 2452620)
Re-read sections 3-C-1-b-(1)-(a) and (b). If you haven’t been getting your additional one hour MPG for unused FSBs after two unused SCs or FSB assignments, you’ve been getting screwed.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:51 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands