Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   1806v (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/110886-1806v.html)

Ni hao 02-01-2018 06:02 AM

I personally do not see them dragging it out. UA pilots on a day to day basis are pretty motivated. If RJ Kirby upsets the apple cart things will not go well. Oscar does not want this.

Record earnings in every sector across the USA. A massive tax cut that UA now has billions to play with. RJ Kirby can want all he wants, just like he wanted at AA. Put UA pilots in 76 seat jets. Grow the airline. Fix a bunch of other things and everyone is happy.

Grumble 02-01-2018 10:02 AM


Originally Posted by Ni hao (Post 2516969)
I personally do not see them dragging it out. UA pilots on a day to day basis are pretty motivated. If RJ Kirby upsets the apple cart things will not go well. Oscar does not want this.

Record earnings in every sector across the USA. A massive tax cut that UA now has billions to play with. RJ Kirby can want all he wants, just like he wanted at AA. Put UA pilots in 76 seat jets. Grow the airline. Fix a bunch of other things and everyone is happy.

UA has gotten no benefit from the tax cut. They’re still taking carry forward tax losses from the lost decade. When those run out UA will actually have to pay taxes.

cadetdrivr 02-01-2018 10:13 AM


Originally Posted by Grumble (Post 2517209)
UA has gotten no benefit from the tax cut. They’re still taking carry forward tax losses from the lost decade. When those run out UA will actually have to pay taxes.

Yup. And now the carry forwards will last even longer.

Taxes: On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into federal law, which, among other changes, reduces the federal corporate tax rate to 21%. The tax rate change will reduce the Company’s federal income tax liability in future years beginning with 2018. The Company expects a tax rate of approximately 22% to 24% for the full year of 2018. The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards are expected to offset taxable income and no material cash taxes are expected to be paid in 2018.

Larry in TN 02-01-2018 10:24 AM


Originally Posted by Ni hao (Post 2516969)
Put UA pilots in 76 seat jets. Grow the airline. Fix a bunch of other things and everyone is happy.

I don't know if that will ever happen but, if it did, they wouldn't be 76 seaters anymore.

The only reason the E-175 has 76 seats is that it is SCOPE-limited to 76 seats. They put 12 first class seats in it because of the extra room. If configured for mainline, there would be no limit so they'd likely trade six FC seats for as many as 12 E+/E seats. That would put it up to about 82 seats. That would help a little bit with the economics.

MasterOfPuppets 02-01-2018 10:33 AM


Originally Posted by Larry in TN (Post 2517233)
I don't know if that will ever happen but, if it did, they wouldn't be 76 seaters anymore.

The only reason the E-175 has 76 seats is that it is SCOPE-limited to 76 seats. They put 12 first class seats in it because of the extra room. If configured for mainline, there would be no limit so they'd likely trade six FC seats for as many as 12 E+/E seats. That would put it up to about 82 seats. That would help a little bit with the economics.

You are most most likely correct and with the fuel efficiency of those 175-E2's it could be a CASM machine.

Larry in TN 02-01-2018 11:28 AM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2517241)
You are most most likely correct and with the fuel efficiency of those 175-E2's it could be a CASM machine.

I'm not convinced that they'd operate the 175-sized airplane at mainline. It wouldn't cost that much more to do the 195/CS100-sized airplane and that would have lower CASM.

svergin 02-01-2018 11:39 AM


Originally Posted by Larry in TN (Post 2517284)
I'm not convinced that they'd operate the 175-sized airplane at mainline. It wouldn't cost that much more to do the 195/CS100-sized airplane and that would have lower CASM.

The problem is our management is looking to solve a "today" problem, but we are going to have these jets for 30 years possibly. There is no reason not to just buy a 100 seat jet, and fly it to markets where they might only fill 76 seats now, but they will grow into 100 seat markets in the future, or shift to markets where it makes sense.

The smallest plane we fly right now is the 737-700 which has between 118-126 seats depending on configuration. We have a big hole in our plane capacity from 76-118, which is a lot of small and medium cities. A 90-100 seat jet would go a long way to filling that hole. Its a strategy thats working for Delta right now.

Our management is SO short-sighted it is amazing.

FlyingSlowly 02-03-2018 12:16 PM


Originally Posted by Boeing Aviator (Post 2515479)
I’m going to make a bold prediction that on our new contract we are going to be the first Legacy to fly 70/76 seater. I also believe we will buy 100 seaters.

My sources tell me both the company and union are motivated to get a deal completed this year. I don’t see the union agreeing to scope concessions. The company wants and needs to grow and wants more 76 seaters. Sure they could order SNB but that would take beyond 2020 to take delivery and grow more 70/76 seaters allowed by Scope choke. They wouldn’t be able to make the recently reported growth targets. The only way to do this is by having mainline fly 70/76 seaters and a mix of new SNB.

Dear United-Continental Pilots,

Please don't give up the SCOPE! The future of pilot careers in the industry depends on you guys holding the line.

You already have my gratitude for keeping the scope limited better than your peers at AAL and DAL.

Signed,
An FO who flies 76-seat RJs for an "airline" owned by an airline

UAL T38 Phlyer 02-03-2018 01:13 PM


Originally Posted by FlyingSlowly (Post 2519036)
Dear United-Continental Pilots,

Please don't give up the SCOPE! The future of pilot careers in the industry depends on you guys holding the line.

You already have my gratitude for keeping the scope limited better than your peers at AAL and DAL.

Signed,
An FO who flies 76-seat RJs for an "airline" owned by an airline

If that isn’t a rallying-cry, charter, and creed, I don’t know what is.

Ex ore infantium.

Shifty 02-03-2018 02:48 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Amen we will hold the line. Attachment 3566

APC225 02-03-2018 06:22 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Hold the line. If Uncle Leo can, we can.

Shifty 02-04-2018 10:07 AM

Haha! Awesome. Unfortunately a lot of kids don’t know who Uncle Leo is. I guess we are getting to that age.

Slop 02-04-2018 01:50 PM

What’s with the 19 DEN Guppy FO awards?? 19??

PA Slammer 02-04-2018 03:14 PM

Making room for all those who might get hired at the FTC.

pilotgolfer 02-04-2018 04:57 PM


Originally Posted by PA Slammer (Post 2520047)
Making room for all those who might get hired at the FTC.

I dont think thats how it works.

PA Slammer 02-04-2018 05:21 PM


Originally Posted by pilotgolfer (Post 2520092)
I dont think thats how it works.

Dunno... funny how it coincides with a large increase in PI hiring...

Floyd 02-04-2018 05:23 PM

The term "Paper Bid" comes to mind.

HuggyU2 02-04-2018 09:25 PM


Originally Posted by Shifty (Post 2519838)
Haha! Awesome. Unfortunately a lot of kids don’t know who Uncle Leo is. I guess we are getting to that age.

I'm probably much older than you, and I have no clue who Uncle Leo is.

liveupthere 02-04-2018 09:35 PM

You guys didn’t watch enough Seinfeld.

Winston 02-04-2018 10:21 PM


Originally Posted by pilotgolfer (Post 2520092)
I dont think thats how it works.

Check out the Crew Resource Update dated 1/26/18, paragraph 1, bullet point 2.

PC states that’s specifically what it’s for.

PA Slammer 02-05-2018 05:05 AM


Originally Posted by Winston (Post 2520259)
Check out the Crew Resource Update dated 1/26/18, paragraph 1, bullet point 2.

PC states that’s specifically what it’s for.

Eh, what do I know...

Arthur Vandelay 02-05-2018 05:05 AM


Originally Posted by liveupthere (Post 2520245)
You guys didn’t watch enough Seinfeld.

Oh! Sorry! I guess I was to busy perusing my dreams... becoming an architect.

APC225 02-05-2018 05:43 AM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by [B
Arthur Vandelay[/B];2520322]Oh! Sorry! I guess I was to busy perusing my dreams... becoming an architect.

Well played.

And you thought you could be an architect.

JoePatroni 02-05-2018 06:10 AM


Originally Posted by Arthur Vandelay (Post 2520322)
Oh! Sorry! I guess I was to busy perusing my dreams... becoming an architect.

Why stop there? Why not a city planner?

pilotgolfer 02-05-2018 06:12 AM


Originally Posted by Winston (Post 2520259)
Check out the Crew Resource Update dated 1/26/18, paragraph 1, bullet point 2.

PC states that’s specifically what it’s for.

“Sets room aside for the hiring of PIs”. I guess I don’t understand why there is a need for that. The PIs are listed as SUP and they don’t take a spot on the domicile roster (count toward the min/max)..they are just extras.

I’m sure they know what they are doing. 🙈🙉🙊🤡🤡🤡

PA Slammer 02-05-2018 06:14 AM

Yeah, but they aren't hired yet. You take 10, 20 or even 30 guys out, and it really leaves a hole for the summer flying.

APC225 02-05-2018 06:37 AM


Originally Posted by JoePatroni (Post 2520359)
Why stop there? Why not a city planner?

Or maybe an engineer.

BoJet 02-05-2018 07:40 AM


Originally Posted by pilotgolfer (Post 2520361)
“Sets room aside for the hiring of PIs”. I guess I don’t understand why there is a need for that. The PIs are listed as SUP and they don’t take a spot on the domicile roster (count toward the min/max)..they are just extras.

I’m sure they know what they are doing. 🙈🙉🙊🤡🤡🤡

It’s based on an assumption that most of the Pilots that will be selected as PIs are already based in DEN. They will need to be replaced.

SUX4U 02-05-2018 08:29 AM


Originally Posted by BoJet (Post 2520419)
It’s based on an assumption that most of the Pilots that will be selected as PIs are already based in DEN. They will need to be replaced.

How many times has man power screwed the pooch with assuming what pilots are going to do? Especially with the previous widebody displacements.

BoJet 02-05-2018 09:43 AM


Originally Posted by SUX4U (Post 2520452)
How many times has man power screwed the pooch with assuming what pilots are going to do? Especially with the previous widebody displacements.

I didn't say they were right! Just noted which assumption it was based upon. If applications have started coming in, they may have a gotten a hint about where these pilots are coming from. Or, it could be a straight up guess.

Larry in TN 02-05-2018 09:47 AM


Originally Posted by APC225 (Post 2520343)
And you thought you could be an architect.

"You knew that I always wanted to pretend to be an architect!"

SUX4U 02-05-2018 11:42 AM


Originally Posted by BoJet (Post 2520504)
I didn't say they were right! Just noted which assumption it was based upon. If applications have started coming in, they may have a gotten a hint about where these pilots are coming from. Or, it could be a straight up guess.

Sorry, wasn’t challenging you, more making an observation about their history of failure when assuming what pilots will do when it comes to bids and bumps.

MasterOfPuppets 02-05-2018 12:38 PM


Originally Posted by SUX4U (Post 2520617)
Sorry, wasn’t challenging you, more making an observation about their history of failure when assuming what pilots will do when it comes to bids and bumps.

True but in this case they had all the applications in hand and they know how many pilots are coming out of DEN and into TK.

SUX4U 02-05-2018 12:56 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2520683)
True but in this case they had all the applications in hand and they know how many pilots are coming out of DEN and into TK.

Fair enough! That might be the most organized I’ve seen them in the past 3 years if that’s the case.

BoJet 02-06-2018 09:43 AM


Originally Posted by SUX4U (Post 2520712)
Fair enough! That might be the most organized I’ve seen them in the past 3 years if that’s the case.

I completely agree with you SUX4U! They COULD have had all that info, and SHOULD have but, you know...
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice... apply for a job in planning.
In all seriousness, the recent shuffles especially the 787 IAH thing instills ZERO confidence that this is actually well thought out and planned.

davessn763 02-07-2018 06:51 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2515462)
United is:

#800's from a 5 year CA
#1000's from a 4 year CA
#1200's from a 3 year CA

And those numbers INCLUDE 200+ furloughs still with recall rights.

DL has hired more pilots every single year than UA 2012-present. My 2018 bold prediction is that UA will succeed in growing at 6-8% through 2020 and that by 2021 we will have a fleet roughly the size as DL (including 100 seaters) and UA will have a quicker upgrade than DL. And with our industry leading WB fleet UA will be the place people will want to work over DL and AA.

Can you show the math on any of that other than Delta hiring more than united which is true for pretty much the entire last decade.

Yup and I’m mostly a pessimist when it comes to United and they rarely miss the mark. I tried to be an optimist this week. I was looking forward to flying MUC again in March as previously advertised, but the company did not disappoint my normal self and pushed it back to April. I only moved back 1% in base on this latest bid so I got that going for me.

Please tell me what Tony Robbins books you are reading because I could really use some help seeing the awesomeness at United.

Triumph 02-08-2018 04:58 AM


Originally Posted by davessn763 (Post 2522848)
Can you show the math on any of that other than Delta hiring more than united which is true for pretty much the entire last decade.



Yup and I’m mostly a pessimist when it comes to United and they rarely miss the mark. I tried to be an optimist this week. I was looking forward to flying MUC again in March as previously advertised, but the company did not disappoint my normal self and pushed it back to April. I only moved back 1% in base on this latest bid so I got that going for me.



Please tell me what Tony Robbins books you are reading because I could really use some help seeing the awesomeness at United.



You commute to work don’t you?

davessn763 02-08-2018 05:14 AM


Originally Posted by Triumph (Post 2523017)
You commute to work don’t you?

Nope live 25 minutes from the airport in a hot humid stagnant base where for some reason all the senior people are moving to.

MasterOfPuppets 02-08-2018 07:21 AM


Originally Posted by davessn763 (Post 2522848)
Can you show the math on any of that other than Delta hiring more than united which is true for pretty much the entire last decade.

Yup and I’m mostly a pessimist when it comes to United and they rarely miss the mark. I tried to be an optimist this week. I was looking forward to flying MUC again in March as previously advertised, but the company did not disappoint my normal self and pushed it back to April. I only moved back 1% in base on this latest bid so I got that going for me.

Please tell me what Tony Robbins books you are reading because I could really use some help seeing the awesomeness at United.

Sure

Delta, according to air fleets.net, has 860 jets. They are parking all of their MD-80/90 fleet by 2020 which is 166 aircraft plus an unknown amount of old 757s and A320s. They have 200 or so aircraft on order so their fleet will remain mostly flat.

United by comparison has 100 or so jets due by the end of 2020 and we are not retiring anything. after 2020 we have 100 more 737 due.

So by 2020 if we from by 6-8% every year and don't park any jets we will be roughly the same size as DL. Which means our upgrade should be pretty close to inline with theirs.

The most Junior DL CA today is on the MD-80 so unless that pilot gets someone junior to them on a bid before they start displacing off the MD-80 they will have to displace into an FO seat.

The next junior CA aircraft is the 717, a 100 seater, I do believe that UA will have a 100 seat aircraft order on the books by early next year or sooner. If that happens UAs upgrade will drop to a year just due to the pay rates.

DL has 2014 hires as CAs on the airbus and 737 as I said above we are only 1000 numbers away from this here at United. My guess is by spring of next year there will be a 2013-2014 CA on the 737/320 at United.

DL has hired over 1000 a year for the last 4 years while United has hired 600 on average. That means that there are 400 more pilots to get through every year at DL to make CA. So by 2020 I think United will have more junior CAs than DL.

I know there are a ton of assumptions in there but going off of todays info and a successful growth plan United will be on the same playing field as DL by 2020. Thats my math.

bigfatdaddy 02-08-2018 07:54 AM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 2523152)
Sure

Delta, according to air fleets.net, has 860 jets. They are parking all of their MD-80/90 fleet by 2020 which is 166 aircraft plus an unknown amount of old 757s and A320s. They have 200 or so aircraft on order so their fleet will remain mostly flat.

United by comparison has 100 or so jets due by the end of 2020 and we are not retiring anything. after 2020 we have 100 more 737 due.

So by 2020 if we from by 6-8% every year and don't park any jets we will be roughly the same size as DL. Which means our upgrade should be pretty close to inline with theirs.

The most Junior DL CA today is on the MD-80 so unless that pilot gets someone junior to them on a bid before they start displacing off the MD-80 they will have to displace into an FO seat.

The next junior CA aircraft is the 717, a 100 seater, I do believe that UA will have a 100 seat aircraft order on the books by early next year or sooner. If that happens UAs upgrade will drop to a year just due to the pay rates.

DL has 2014 hires as CAs on the airbus and 737 as I said above we are only 1000 numbers away from this here at United. My guess is by spring of next year there will be a 2013-2014 CA on the 737/320 at United.

DL has hired over 1000 a year for the last 4 years while United has hired 600 on average. That means that there are 400 more pilots to get through every year at DL to make CA. So by 2020 I think United will have more junior CAs than DL.

I know there are a ton of assumptions in there but going off of todays info and a successful growth plan United will be on the same playing field as DL by 2020. Thats my math.

I like where you are going with this.....my concern/question is “How much of the 6-8% growth assumption is based on increased utilization rates of existing personnel and equipment, rather than growth thru additional personnel and equipment”? Been watching a disturbing pattern of deferring delivery’s for awhile now.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands