Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 2635763)
These 175s are not due until 2019. IF the company gets scope relief then they are good if they don’t then the order will be re evaluated. I’m sure there is a no scope relief contingency in the contract.
|
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 2635726)
Drama queen much?
Prior to Kirby UAL was shrinking and considering dehubbing IAD, DEN and/or LAX. We're playing with house money. We just need to say no on scope relief because everything else Kirby is doing bodes well for United and pilots. orders but we are in a slow growth mode. This isn’t the order that’s been speculated between the A330 NEO or the 787 to replace the 767’s. In May there were news reports that stated Airbus was out of the running on the A330 NEO, and United was going to buy 787’s to replace 767’s like AA, but recently there was a flight Global article stating we are in negotiations with Airbus and Boeing for 767 replacements and possibly A321 NEO’s for 757 replacements. My guess Kirby’s playing hard ball playing Boeing and Airbus off each other. This article came out last week. https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...cifics-450083/ |
Originally Posted by DashTrash
(Post 2635757)
Then why not order the EMB-170? That's a 70 seat airplane.
https://www.airfleets.net/listing/e170-11.htm |
Originally Posted by DashTrash
(Post 2635757)
Then why not order the EMB-170? That's a 70 seat airplane.
E-175 “SC” http://m.aviationweek.com/crossover-...les-flowing-us |
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 2635784)
|
Originally Posted by DashTrash
(Post 2635792)
We will see. I personally do not trust Kirby until these airplanes show up. A 70 seat EMB-175 makes no financial sense, from a CASM standpoint. Like I said, it barely makes sense at 76 seats. The sweet spot for the 175 is between 80-90 seats. 70 seats in a 175 will be a very roomy cabin.
|
Originally Posted by Grumble
(Post 2635793)
See link I posted above
|
So we buy them and they fly routes per United's directive. Express gets priority on those jets. Ok
|
Originally Posted by DashTrash
(Post 2635799)
Thank you for posting the link, but I cannot read the full article unless I pay for a subscription.
Search the article title in Google. You'll find a link to the full article. |
Originally Posted by DashTrash
(Post 2635792)
We will see. I personally do not trust Kirby until these airplanes show up. A 70 seat EMB-175 makes no financial sense, from a CASM standpoint. Like I said, it barely makes sense at 76 seats. The sweet spot for the 175 is between 80-90 seats. 70 seats in a 175 will be a very roomy cabin.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:54 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands