Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   and so I asked Oscar a question... (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/117291-so-i-asked-oscar-question.html)

Airhoss 10-23-2018 06:20 AM

Just exactly like when I conduct an MV or other validation event the purpose of a retrain is not punitive. It is an opportunity to repair a deficiency. A probationary report should be the same.

Now if we’ve hired a guy who is a complete dud. And it happens, then the probationary report process might well lead to a needed dismissal. It should never be based on one bad report and there is a process that takes place before a probey pilot is let go.

Just like at the training center. One bad ride does not equal a firing. It takes a Herculean effort at being bad on the pilots part before they are ever shown the door.

awax 10-23-2018 09:08 AM


Originally Posted by Floyd (Post 2695887)
Nothing prevents a Captain from making a quick call to Professional Standards before firing off an unsat probationary report on a pilot with little if any protection. He or she now has the benefit of input from Professional Standards.

Are you saying that probationary pilots now have formal representation in all CPO offices in the system via ProStan?

awax 10-23-2018 09:31 AM


Originally Posted by Airhoss (Post 2696290)

Just like at the training center. One bad ride does not equal a firing. It takes a Herculean effort at being bad on the pilots part before they are ever shown the door.

That’s been my understanding too, although I may have dated info. I’ve never thought that one negative report would torpedo a career, but several may show a trend that deserves a second look.

As a group why wouldn’t we want to let the probationary year work? I’m thinking about the guy shown the door last year with multiple felony convictions. His probationary year was a doozy, but represent at all cost gave every United pilot a black eye in the end.

Hilltopper89 10-23-2018 02:30 PM


Originally Posted by Airhoss (Post 2696290)
Just exactly like when I conduct an MV or other validation event the purpose of a retrain is not punitive. It is an opportunity to repair a deficiency. A probationary report should be the same.

Now if we’ve hired a guy who is a complete dud. And it happens, then the probationary report process might well lead to a needed dismissal. It should never be based on one bad report and there is a process that takes place before a probey pilot is let go.

Just like at the training center. One bad ride does not equal a firing. It takes a Herculean effort at being bad on the pilots part before they are ever shown the door.

Agreed. What’s the purpose of the probationary evaluation by the captain if it’s like an Air Force OPR....all glowing? That said over the course of a trip I’d expect a captain to address issues and not simply write it on the form at the end.

Rawhide51 10-23-2018 02:48 PM

If the Captain was always right, we would not waste union time and money on Pro Standards. Are you telling me every captain out there is within standards on every item? I'd be happy to increase my profit sharing check by no longer requiring MV or LOE's for another captain from the line.

If they aren't all perfect, that probationary pilot report has to be taken with a grain of salt. I'd be happy to just fly a whole trip with one captain that doesn't have his own version of the sop.

I've flown with nervous and paranoid new captains that didn't trust a thing I did. I've also flown with new captains that built a solid crew and made CRM easy.

Start with Pro-standards first. The wrong report in the wrong flight office can ruin a life. If they made it past TK and the LCA's, it could be an example of a bad day with a captain who starts the preflight brief with "I do everything SOP except..."

You can't hold someone to a testing standard when the truth changes daily. The P/I's and LCA's are a bit more standardized than the average captain in our junior bases, who is still ****ed off that they changed the call-outs from what they were before the merger.

sonnycrockett 10-23-2018 04:22 PM

Pro-Standards always your FIRST call! :D

Call early and call often!

climb 10-24-2018 01:40 PM


Originally Posted by sonnycrockett (Post 2696598)
Pro-Standards always your FIRST call! :D

Call early and call often!


Yes, call them so you can hear such gems as:

"next time.. you know.. unless your about to get hurt... maybe it would be better to...um... pilot: shut up and color? yea!""=

"SO the cap said you flew a good jet, were professional, and standard, but (blabla playground bull**** blabla)"

Totally eff up what the legal concept of captains authority is. "capts authority totally applies to (something having nothing to do with an airplane)"

Hold different seat positions to different standards of professionalism.



Its not a magic wand of an organization, they have the best intentions but have a fairly strong agenda. They are not your REPS, they shouldn't represent you with the company.

Often they don't have a good frame of reference and only have the ability to try and shame someone into compliance.

They are not integrated with Hims/EAP/training/safety/newhire committee other than passing the ball and I am not aware of any and see no sign of professional conflict management, data driven decisions, human factors or mediation training.

That being said, my sample size is small and collected from ~10ish instances. (I work with new hires, not all me ;) )

I would say call them, just... be prepared to be disappointed.

awax 10-24-2018 05:00 PM


Originally Posted by Rawhide51 (Post 2696558)
If the Captain was always right, we would not waste union time and money on Pro Standards. Are you telling me every captain out there is within standards on every item? I'd be happy to increase my profit sharing check by no longer requiring MV or LOE's for another captain from the line.

If they aren't all perfect, that probationary pilot report has to be taken with a grain of salt. I'd be happy to just fly a whole trip with one captain that doesn't have his own version of the sop.

I've flown with nervous and paranoid new captains that didn't trust a thing I did. I've also flown with new captains that built a solid crew and made CRM easy.

Start with Pro-standards first. The wrong report in the wrong flight office can ruin a life. If they made it past TK and the LCA's, it could be an example of a bad day with a captain who starts the preflight brief with "I do everything SOP except..."

You can't hold someone to a testing standard when the truth changes daily. The P/I's and LCA's are a bit more standardized than the average captain in our junior bases, who is still ****ed off that they changed the call-outs from what they were before the merger.


This is exactly why we need probationary pilot reports. If a guy shows up this incoherent in the cockpit it needs to be documented. I mean seriously, everyone knows the Captain is always right.

Punkpilot48 10-25-2018 12:28 AM


Originally Posted by awax (Post 2697195)
This is exactly why we need probationary pilot reports. If a guy shows up this incoherent in the cockpit it needs to be documented. I mean seriously, everyone knows the Captain is always right.

Probably only drunk posting cause he’s dealing with one of “those guys”

baseball 10-25-2018 04:00 AM


Originally Posted by sonnycrockett (Post 2696598)
Pro-Standards always your FIRST call! :D

Call early and call often!

Just a procedural question....Are probationary pilots considered "members in good standing?" The answer to that question may depend on weather they can use union services. I may be wrong, but I think only dues paying members can have access to committee resources. Any input on that is appreciated.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:30 PM.


Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands